In December, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of 10 gamers who claimed they "would be adversely affected by reduced competition" as a result of Microsoft's planned buyout of Activision Blizzard, and now those random gamers are looking to get Nintendo and PlayStation's biggest bosses to testify.
This is the "gamer's lawsuit" that you might have heard about at the tail end of 2022, and is completely distinct from the serious FTC lawsuit that was also filed in December. Whether the gamer's lawsuit has any serious merit will, of course, be decided in court, but Microsoft certainly doesn't seem to think so, as the company's lawyers filed a motion for the suit to be dismissed entirely.
I am not a lawyer, and if you want a more detailed breakdown of what's going on here, you should take a look at the FOSS Patents blog run by Florian Mueller, who was formerly an advisor to companies ranging from (appropriately enough) Microsoft to Blizzard. Mueller says that he believes the "lawyers made a totally overreaching demand by requesting an April trial as well as immediate and unfettered discovery, and I doubt that Judge Corley will consider their positions reasonable."
This is not a class-action lawsuit - there are only ten plaintiffs, after all - but in previous writing about this case, Mueller has noted that similar types of suits in the "class-action business" have had pretty frivolous objectives. "You just spend your time, and you can hope that even if your case is going nowhere, a megacorp defendant may at some point be willing to pay you off to go away, even if only because of the 'nuisance value' (the cost of a proper defense) of your lawsuit."
One key European trade union is in support of Microsoft's Activision-Blizzard acquisition.
