The ENNIES, for those unaware, are one of the most well-renowned, fan-voted tabletop RPG awards around. Hosted at Gen Con (a tabletop convention founded in 1968 by none other than D&D's co-creator Gary Gygax), the ENNIES seek to elevate and celebrate the hard work and innovation of artists and designers of the best tabletop RPGs world-round. Categories include, but are not limited to, Best Cover Art, Best Writing, Best Rules, Best Cartography, and Best Adventure.
Recently, controversies arose over the ENNIES submission policies, which allowed submissions to use generative AI in their project, provided that which was generated had nothing to do with the category to which it was submitted. So submissions using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate a narrative were not allowed to submit to the Best Writing category, but could still make a play for Best Cartography.
Comments on an r/RPG Reddit post detailing the policy revision indicate a collective sigh of relief.
User OnlyOnHBO notes that this is a "Good change," but says its "Pathetic that they had to be yelled at to make it happen. Still don't trust 'em to be a good source of product recommendations as a result."
"With more awareness of companies trying to cut out creatives with algorithmic generated content, I agree that any company that does that shouldn't be eligible for awards meant to celebrate creators" says user rzelln.
Another commenter, Mr_Venom, chimes in with "Brilliant. Now creators won't disclose what tools they've used. What a masterstroke."
While there is still a lot of discussion around whether this is a wise decision, or whether it will make a difference at all, the consensus in the community is that this is at least a step toward avoiding a minefield of stolen artwork.
For more recommendations, why not check out the best tabletop RPGs or maybe something on solo RPGs.
