• SpadesSlick - July 1, 2014 3:50 p.m.

    The Tyranny of The Fruity King lives on. #SaveUsY2J
  • Swedish_Chef - July 1, 2014 11:39 a.m.

    Wait where is he on the cover? I can't see him. I can't wait to see what a glorious trainwreck this game will eventually turn out to be, like the past two games. (For the record 2K14 is miles better than '13 but it's still pretty damn broken).
  • Frieza - July 1, 2014 12:53 p.m.

    I-I didn't think 2K13 was that bad...
  • Frieza - June 17, 2014 6:07 a.m.

    I hope all the old wrestlers won't be cut from the game. I didn't get the last one, and 2K14 had some of my favorite wrestlers in it. Either way, I'm probably going to play Dean Ambrose most of the time anyway.
  • aimbotmaster - June 17, 2014 4:29 a.m.

    *God Save Our Queen* 'Ello everyone, I'm afraid I got a bit of bad news for you. THQ's system will probably still be in place for this game, they'll NEVER go back to the more arcadey feel that was in Here Comes The Pain or Day Of Reckoning. In fact since this is 2K this game will probably try to be more of a simulation wrestling game. And I can guarantee you'll be hearing commentary reminding you to download the WWE app, as well constant reminders to sign up for the WWE Network every five minutes. Plus you better save up your pennies if you want everyone, because they'll probably keep all of your favorite wrestler legends behind a pay-wall as DLC. And I hope you don't want a mode where you get to play as C.M Punk as he goes on to be the longest-reigning WWE Champion of the modern era, like the Undertakers beat the streak mode last year, because C.M Punk won't be in the game at all. He's too busy watching the Chicago Black-Hawks loose. But don't worry I'm sure Hornswoggle and El Torito will be in. Have a great night. #Bad New Botmaster
  • shawksta - June 16, 2014 6:15 p.m.

    Im still mad that Brock was the one to beat the streak, it shouldve been Roman Reigns, who would then just flat out become the next Undertaker.
  • TurkeyOnRye - June 17, 2014 5:46 a.m.

    That's a terrible idea... at least the Roman Reigns becoming the new Undertaker part. I do agree though that letting Brock end the streak just to give Paul Heyman some new oral bits is a complete waste. They should have let someone who is an relatively new and they plan on putting the shoulders of the company on (Reigns, Bryan, Cesaro, Rollins) beat Taker. But no, there doesn't need to be another Undertaker.
  • shawksta - June 17, 2014 2:55 p.m.

    I only said it because he resembles him, otherwise yeah he doesnt have to be the next Undertaker.

Showing 1-8 of 8 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000