Why you can trust GamesRadar+ Our experts review games, movies and tech over countless hours, so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about our reviews policy.

Go to page:

Page 2

For a game that places so much value on the visual, on seeing unusual stuff and photographing and filming stuff, but which never goes as far as letting us interact directly with the subjects in question, it’s inevitable that Afrika is not entirely satisfactory. It’s easy to compile montages that make Afrika appear more technically awesome than it actually is.

Seen up-close and from infinite different perspectives – in motion, and in perfect stillness while waiting for something to happen – it becomes apparent that the graphics engine powering this experience is 50 percent incredible and 50 percent hideous. The incredible parts include the lifelike animation and hi-res textures of every last creature, the changing sky, and the draw distance. The hideous bits include the cheap-trick stretched horizon images, the PS2-level terrain textures, the invisible walls and the framerate, which is shakier than the hands of a debutant plastic surgeon. The overall effect is such that while Afrika looks great in the key places, you can tell it’s just an elaborate hoax.

There are other shortcuts taken which again show that Afrika isn’t truly committed to realism. For example, the screen flashes red for danger when you get too close to an animal that has aggressive/defensive instincts, but even if you stand your ground or move closer, the only real danger is that you’ll trigger a cutscene of the animal stampeding against a black background, out of context, and then find yourself dazed but waking back in your tent. There’s no Game Over screen in Afrika.