Sofia Coppola’s new drama Somewhere has been awarded the top prize at the Venice Film Festival.
The drama, which features a stellar turn from Stephen Dorff as the layabout father of Elle Fanning, surprised attendees as it was declared the best of the fest, trampling competition from favourites like Black Swan.
Not only that, but the festival jury - who were led by geek titan Quentin Tarantino - were unanimous in their decision to give Coppola’s film the much coveted shiny.
Other flicks that won big were Alex de la Iglesia’s A Sad Trumpet Ballad, which bagged the Silver Lion (or Best Director) gong, Vincent Gallo’s Essential Killing (which took home the Special Jury Prize and Best Actor award) and Attenburg, which earned Ariane Labed a Best Actress trophy.
Black Swan didn’t go home empty handed, though – Mila Kunis grabbed the Best Young Actor prize.
A full run-down of the awards...
Golden Lion For Best Film:
Somewhere (Sofia Coppola)
Silver Lion For Best Director:
Alex de la Iglesia (Balada triste de trompeta)
Special Jury Prize:
Essential Killing (Jerzy Skolimowsky)
Coppa Volpi For Best Actor:
Vincent Gallo (Essential Killing)
Coppa Volpi For Best Actress:
Ariane Labed (Attenberg)
Osella For Best Screenplay:
Alex de la Iglesia (Balada triste de trompeta)
Marcello Mastroianni Award For Best Young Actor Or Actress:
Mila Kunis (Black Swan)
Osella For Best Cinematography:
Mikhail Krichman (Silent Souls)
Special Lion For An Overall Work:
European Cinema Award:
The Clink Of The Ice
Leoncino d’Oro Prize:
Queer Lion For Best Gay Film:
In the Future
The 67th Venice Film Festival is winding down but the Golden Lion is still up for grabs.
Tomorrow night, Quentin Tarantino will announce which of the 24 films in competition will walk away with the coveted top prize.
Despite hurricane-like storms battering the Lido over the week and the ever-growing shadow of the Toronto Film Festival looming over the Atlantic, it’s still been a strong line-up.
It means the jury members have a tough decision on their hands when it comes to dividing the prizes, for there seems no one obvious candidate, unlike last year, when Samuel Maoz’s tank-set drama
took the honours.
This time, there are several contenders. The critic’s favourite is clearly the 75-minute Tarkovsky-inspired
, by Russian director Aleksei Fedorchenko, who – if he won – would follow fellow countryman Andrei Zvyagintsev, who claimed the Golden Lion in 2003 for
Tran Anh Hung’s
his beautiful adaptation of the 1987 Haruki Murakami novel of the same name, must also be up there – though the fact the Vietnamese director won in 1995 for
may count against him.
Of the American films, Kelly Reichardt’s western
stands a chance – though I’m tempted to believe its filmmaker may claim a Silver Lion for Best Director or its cinematographer Chris Blauvelt may be awarded a prize for artistic achievement.
Still, with Tarantino as the head of the jury, don’t bet against his old friend Takashi Miike taking the prize for his Samurai epic
It wouldn’t be fair, but then festival juries are never known for being fair, right?
Absorbing, rich and blessed with a wonderfully dry sense of humour,
is a sophisticated treat.
Adapted from the prize-winning novel by Canadian author Mordecai Richler, it’s the sort of bleak comedy that Hollywood rarely has the guts to make anymore.
At its core is yet another titanic turn from Paul Giamatti, with a character that ranks alongside Harvey Pekar in
and Miles in
He plays Barney Panofsky, a foul-mouthed US television producer who runs his own company Totally Unnecessary Productions, known for producing long-running soap ‘O’Malley of the North.’
While there are some in-jokes – David Cronenberg plays a director who snoozes on set, Denys Arcand cameos as Maître d’ – Barney’s Version is no insider look at showbiz.
In truth, Barney’s profession is secondary to his love life. Married three times, what we see is Barney’s version of events as he reflects on the mistakes he made.
Though nominally set in the present, with Barney now 65 years old, much of the film is seen in flashback as his the three relationships that defined his life unfold.
His first wife, the free-spirited, unfaithful Clara (Rachelle Lefevre) is not with us for long. Meeting her in Rome in 1974, after their baby is still born, she commits suicide.
The second spouse, known as Mrs. P (Minnie Driver, in excellent comic form), is a Jewish Princess who just doesn’t stop talking.
But it’s at their lavish wedding that he meets the love of his life, Miriam (Rosamund Pike), a New York DJ for a jazz station who Barney falls instantly in love with – so much so, he ducks out of his reception to pursue her.
As he says, much later on, “Have I ever given up when it comes to you?” And for all his bitterness and bad behaviour, Barney is also an incurable romantic, something that makes him fascinating to watch.
Giamatti doesn’t put a foot wrong here, convincing us with ease that Barney is a likeable fellow (without ever trying to ingratiate himself with the audience).
There’s also a glorious turn from Dustin Hoffman, who plays Barney’s father, a retired cop who seems as politically inappropriate as his son.
Directed by Richard J. Lewis, this is a major achievement for a director best known for his involvement in landmark television show,
And don’t be surprised if Giamatti walks away with the Best Actor prize here over the weekend.
Mystifying in the extreme, veteran director Monte Hellman’s
Road To Nowhere
is a baffling
set in the world of moviemaking.
While Hellman may be best known for his cult road movie,
Two Lane Blacktop
, this latest effort treads a more oblique path – from the Smoky Mountains of North Carolina via, Rome, Verona and London.
If you were being cruel, you might say that it’s an apt title for a story that goes nowhere too – though there’s enough here to warrant a second (and hopefully more enlightening) viewing.
Admittedly, the prologue is spectacular – as star Shannyn Sossamon contemplates a lake view from her car, only to see a small plane crash into the water. So unexpected is it, the audience in the screening I saw burst into spontaneous applause.
Fake credits follow for a film-within-a-film, entitled ‘Road To Nowhere’. Bearing the legend, ‘A Mitchell Haven Picture’, it stars ‘Cary Stewart’ in a tale based on a true-life crime story about politics, corruption and suicide.
With Stewart (Cliff De Young) cast as leading man Rafe Tachen, the cocksure Haven (Tygh Runyan) is now looking to find his female protagonist, the wonderfully named Velma Duran.
Enter Lauren Graham (Sossamon), an actress with just one vampire flick to her name. Despite having the likes of Scarlett Johansson interested in the role, Haven wants her. “You are Velma Duran,” he says.
From the casting couch, they swiftly move to the bedroom – but from here on, the confusion really starts, with Hellman cutting between off-camera moments and scenes from Haven’s picture.
What’s real and what’s not become increasingly difficult to define – with the film reminding you of David Lynch’s
, with its cocktail of sex and celluloid.
As you might expect for a film about filmmaking, there are some in-jokes. With the script written by Steven Gaydos, an executive editor at
, his colleague Peter Bart features as himself, interviewing Haven on camera.
Hellman also posts some blatant movie reference points – everything from Nicholas Ray’s classic
In a Lonely Place
to Preston Sturges’
The Lady Eve
and Ingmar Begman’s
The Seventh Seal
If the story can be maddening for much of the time, it’s pleasing to see a strong lead for the oft-overlooked Sossamon, whose dark hair and beguiling brown eyes make her the perfect
Likewise, it’s also nice to see Dominique Swain (she of Adrian Lyne’s
fame) on screen again – in a role that sees her play a blogger who becomes embroiled with the filmmakers.
Road To Nowhere
doesn’t come close to Hellman’s early classics, it’s such a strange viewing experience, it seems pre-ordained to gain a cult following – even if it will probably pass out of Venice unnoticed.
The highly prolific Japanese auteur Takashi Miike may well be the hardest working man in showbiz, with over 70 feature credits to his name in a twenty-year career.
is an ultra-violent samurai film, a remake of Eichi Kudo’s 1963 black-and-white movie,
Jusan-Nin No Shikaku
Set in feudal Japan, it begins with the rise to power of the sadistic Lord Naritsugu (Goro Inagaki), who rapes and kills with disturbing abandon.
Privately, the highly courageous and respected samurai Shinzaemon Shimada (Koji Yakusho) is called upon to defeat him.
To do so, he assembles a crack team of 13 assassins with the intention of ambushing Naritsugu and his massive entourage – in what can only be regarded as a certain suicide mission.
This band of blindly courageous warriors – a dirty baker’s dozen, you might say – do get some help, in the shape Koyota (Yusuke Iseya), a feral creature with a healthy disdain for all samurai.
What follows, as you might expect when Takashi Miike gets a samurai sword in his hand, is carnage on a massive scale. Or “total massacre” as they call it.
Some of the sequences are downright jaw dropping – in particular when several bulls are set on fire and used as flaming battering rams (don’t worry, animal lovers, it was all CGI).
Once the stabbing, slicing and chopping gets underway, there isn’t much below the surface of
, though Takashi’s approach is so relentless, you just get swept up in it.
By the time it ends, corpses littering the landscape as far as the eye can see, you can practically smell the stench of rotting flesh in the air.
It won’t win him any converts but fans of his uncompromising style will love it.
Arguably the biggest Hollywood film of the festival arrived today – Ben Affleck’s second film as director, bank robbery drama
Certainly there was a buzz in the press conference, as Affleck and British über-producer Graham King led the actors on stage.
Alongside Rebecca Hall and Jeremy Renner, the biggest round of applause was reserved for Jon Hamm, presumably due to his current popularity as the louche ad man Don Draper from Mad Men.
Affleck, back in Venice after winning Best Actor here for his turn as George Reeves in 2006’s
, led the charge in explaining just why his second effort as director after
Gone Baby Gone
was again set in Boston.
“I was a little bit hesitant to do this because I didn’t want to get pigeon-holed as the Boston-director guy,” said Affleck. “But I liked the part. I wanted to play the part. And I believed the story was good.”
Adapted from the novel
Prince of Thieves
by Chuck Hogan, this story is a solid, if a little unremarkable tale of professional bank robbers from the city’s Charlestown suburb.
Affleck, directing himself for the first time, plays Doug MacRay, the self-styled leader of the gang, which also features
The Hurt Locker
star Renner as loose-cannon Jem.
Hall is Claire, the manager of the bank that the gang robs at the outset who unwittingly becomes romantically embroiled with Doug, while Hamm is the FBI agent trying to track them down.
There’s also a nice turn from
’s Blake Lively as MacRay’s former white trash girlfriend, now an alcohol and drug dependant single mother.
While it unfolds at a decent clip, the film that immediately leaps to mind is Michael Mann’s
never comes close to that.
Of the three robberies that act as the film’s beginning, middle and end, it’s the middle-sequence – with the team dressed, bizarrely, as nuns – that injects some fierce adrenaline into proceedings.
Affleck does a better job as director than he does as actor though – proving just how smart he was to cast younger brother Casey in
Gone Baby Gone
Hamm, at least until he gets his scene with Blake Lively, is largely wasted, while Renner doesn’t quite fire on all cylinders.
Slick and glossy, there’s nothing wrong with
as a pure example of Hollywood entertainment. But it doesn’t live long in the memory.
Nine years on from winning the Oscar for Best Foreign Film for
No Man’s Land
, Danis Tanović returns to its Bosnian setting with his new film
Playing in the Venice Days strand of the festival, it’s set two years before
No Man’s Land
, in 1991, in the weeks running up to the war that tore the region apart.
Based on the novel by Ivica Đikić, it tells the story of Divko Buntic (Emir Kusturica regular Miki Manojlović), who returns to his home town after a 20 year absence.
With a sexy new girlfriend Azra (Jelena Stupljanin) in tow, he arrives to evict his estranged wife Lucija (Mira Furlan) and their 20 year-old son Martin (Boris Ler) from the family home.
Despite this, Divko makes an attempt to reach out to the son he barely knows, infuriating Lucija in the process, while his increasingly erratic behaviour starts to drive Azra away.
Amid all these squabbles – not least Divko losing his beloved cat Bonny – the clouds of war gather in the background, as the Serbs start to bomb Dubrovnik and the townsfolk are forced to take sides.
No Man’s Land
was a parable, dealing with two enemy soldiers trapped with each other,
is more of a domestic drama that alleviates the darkness with some finely judged moment of humour.
Tanović’s script, co-written with Đikić, builds up gradually, blending the personal and the political with a natural rhythm that never feels contrived.
By the finale, as Divko finds it in his heart for an act of generosity that’s somewhat out of character, you’re left with a tremendously moving piece that quietly reflects the madness of war.
The girl with the dragon tattoo is back – and her scars are clearly still there.
Swedish star Noomi Rapace, best known for her portrayal of Lisbeth Salander in the ‘Millennium’ trilogy, has been on the Lido promoting
, a bleak tale of domestic abuse and alcoholism.
The sort of film that should come with a prescription for anti-depressants, it marks the directorial debut of Pernilla August (known to millions as Anakin Skywalker’s mother in
The Phantom Menace
Rapace plays Leena, a mother-of-two with a devoted husband, Johan (played by Rapace’s real-life husband, Ola).
When she receives a call from the hospital one morning just before Christmas, informing her that her mother is dying, it triggers a series of memories she’s long since buried.
Flashing back to her childhood, we learn that she and her younger brother Flisan grew up with a Finnish father, Kimmo (Ville Virtanen), who frequently took his alcohol-fuelled rages out on their mother Aili (Aki Kaurismäki regular Outi Mäenpää).
Cutting between the past and present, as Leena journeys across country to see her ailing mother, August builds up a picture of a childhood you wouldn’t wish on your worst enemy.
While Kimmo and Aili live like a more violent version of Wayne and Waynetta Slob, its little wonder that Flisan retreats into his shell and becomes a virtual mute while Leena is left to clear up her drunken father’s excrement from the kitchen floor.
Indeed, August’s depiction of this dysfunctional family make the clan in fellow Swede Lukas Moodysson’s
A Hole In My Heart
look like the Waltons.
Uncompromising and fearless, there’s a typically tough turn from Rapace, whose breakdown near the finale is as mesmerizing as it is heart-wrenching.
As for August, who came to prominence in Ingmar Bergman’s
Fanny and Alexander
, you might say she’s done her old mentor proud.
More Venice 2010
Scanning the dozens of Italian films playing in and out of competition this year in Venice,
was always going to be the must-see.
The story of real-life Milan mobster Renato Vallanzasca, currently serving four consecutive life sentence for an escalating series of crimes across the 1970s and ’80s, it has all the ingredients for a bloody gangster classic.
For starters, there’s actor-director Michele Placido (who made the 2005 crime saga
) behind the camera.
Then there’s the magnetic Kim Rossi Stuart (who featured in
) in the lead, an actor more than capable of embodying the cocksure swagger of this hoodlum on the rise.
With an international support cast including the likes of Paz Vega and Moritz Bleibtreu, an electric score and lashings of violence, it has to be good, right?
is a messy film at best, lurching from bank robbery to prison stint to street-side murder with a chaos that echoes its hero’s own lifestyle on the lam.
The best scenes are certainly near the beginning. “I was born to be a thief,” Vallanzasca tells us, and Placido’s depiction of his early ‘punk’ years is gripping.
But as turf wars with rival gangster Turatello (Francesco Scianna) escalate, it becomes increasingly hard to care about Vallanzasca or his cronies.
It doesn’t help that all the characters, in their terrible ’70s suits, sunglasses and perms, spend most of the film squabbling with each other. When they begin to meet their makers,
What does linger long in the memory is Kim Rossi Stuart, whose performance burns almost as brightly as his blue eyes - reminding me of when Robert De Niro first blazed on the screen as Johnny Boy in
As a carefree Robin Hood-style saga,
just about covers it. But what the film really lacks is any great emotional depth.
Is it a hoax or not? That was the question on everyone’s lips today.
Trouble is, after seeing Casey Affleck’s wildly outrageous documentary
I’m Still Here
– and hearing him speak afterwards at the press conference – nobody could decide.
Rumours have circulated for months about this warts-and-all portrait of Affleck’s brother-in-law Joaquin Phoenix, who announced his retirement from acting in the autumn of 2008 to concentrate on a hip-hop career.
As he says in the film, “I don’t want to play the character of Joaquin anymore.” Yet is Phoenix just playing a different character here?
Taking us through to March 2009, Affleck follows Phoenix on a downward spiral, as he gains weight, grows a ridiculous beard and becomes more and more isolated from his friends.
He spurns advances from agents and actors (including an offer from Ben Stiller to play the Rhys Ifans role in
), while trying to pester Sean ‘P.Diddy’ Combs to produce his debut hip-hop album.
After he starts performing on stage (badly, I might say),
breaks a story that it’s all an elaborate hoax.
“I can tell you there’s no hoax,” said Affleck, who wasn’t joined by Phoenix (in town, and apparently looking respectable) at the press conference.
Indeed, if this is a hoax, it’s one of the most elaborately staged pranks of all time. Think of Sacha Baron Cohen’s own brand of performance art on
and multiply it by a million.
Affleck refused to be drawn on whether certain moments – notably, the shocking scene where Phoenix’s furious assistant defecates on the actor’s head while he’s asleep – were faked.
“I’m a little bit reluctant to speak about specific scenes because I feel like it will influence other people’s experience of the film,” he said.
When one reporter admitted she was “curious” whether the P. Diddy sequence had been staged in some way, Affleck wryly commented “I bet you are” before telling her it was a leading question.
Of course, Affleck’s well aware this will only further the mystery surrounding this portrait of Phoenix, whose surly behaviour across the film goes someway to explain his crazed appearance on the David Letterman show (featured fully in the film).
Other scenes destined to shock include him chopping up and sniffing a white powder of some description and then partying with two naked prostitutes.
In truth, so compelling is this documentary, you want to believe it’s all real. In particular, Phoenix’s post-Letterman come-down (“I’m just going to be a goddamn joke forever,” he rages) is highly touching.
Making his directorial debut, Affleck has certainly delivered a well-made work – full of pace and pathos, craft and care.
Funny, tragic, moving and just jaw-dropping at times, it’s arguably one of the films of the festival so far. Indeed, even if Phoenix’s career is over, Affleck’s has only just begun.
Not having made anything since James Grey’s 2008 film
, there’s little chance Phoenix will ever return to the big screen – certainly after this gets seen.
But as a final performance, it’s one hell of a way to bow out.
There was a feeling of déjà vu when Vincent Gallo’s third film
Promises Written In Water
unspooled this afternoon.
Just like the Cannes screening of his last directorial effort, 2003’s
The Brown Bunny
, the moment the credits ‘Edited By’, ‘Music By’ and ‘Written, Produced and Directed By’ all revealed the name ‘Vincent Gallo’, cat-calls came from the audience.
Seventy-five minutes later, after dozens of walk-outs, the muted applause was drowned by a series of boos and slow hand-claps.
It’s not hard to see why.
Promises Written In Water
is arguably a worse film than
The Brown Bunny
, its saving grace being that it’s mercifully shorter.
At one point early in the film, after Gallo nervously shuffles around an apartment, pacing back and forth, fiddling with various items of clothing, he lets out a sigh of boredom – a moment that saw much of the audience grunt in agreement.
Shot in black-and-white, its flimsy story follows concerns a friendship between a guy named Kevin (Gallo) and a girl named Mallory (Delfine Bafort).
Beautiful yet promiscuous, it seems the only person Mallory doesn’t sleep with is Kevin, who is still wrapped up in a former girlfriend named Colette, who is now dating a 55 year-old guy and heading to Thailand.
A particularly pretentious scene early on sees Kevin explain this to Mallory three or four times (even changing Thailand to Taiwan at one point), almost as if he were doing several ‘takes’ on a movie set.
Interwoven with this are scenes of Kevin dealing with a dead girl (Hope Tomeselli) – propping up her corpse at one point to take photographs – which is never fully explained.
There are isolated moments that grab your attention – such as the scene where Kevin rages against Mallory for calling Colette behind his back or the tender almost-kiss that they share.
To be fair, Balfort, a Belgium-born supermodel, comes out of the film with some credibility – even if Gallo allows his camera to leer over her naked body in a scene of clinical creepiness towards the end.
But, sad as it is to say, Gallo isn’t quite the one-man band he thinks he is. Perhaps his fine debut Buffalo ’66 was a flash in the pan after all.
“This is going to be a slow burner,” a pre-warned colleague informed me, moments before the lights went down on Kelly Reichardt’s
He wasn’t kidding. Think of a tortoise tiptoeing through treacle and you may get close to describing the pace of this 19th Century Oregon-set western.
Of course, Reichardt is no novice. If the energy of the film could be described as leisurely, it’s only because it accurately reflects a way of life 150 years ago.
The story sees three families traveling across the Oregon Trail in covered wagons, being led by experienced mountain man Stephen Meek (Bruce Greenwood).
From the moment one carves ‘Lost’ into the side of a wagon, you know things aren’t going to end happily – though Meek insists “We’re not lost, we’re finding our way.”
Yet after a short-cut leads them into difficulties, discontent starts brewing – in particular via the forthright Emily (Michelle Williams, the lead in Reichardt’s last film
Wendy and Lucy
Events do, however, gather momentum in the second half – partly because the water supply is running dangerously short, partly because Meek captures a scout from the Cayuse tribe (Rod Rondeaux).
In a film where just two shots are fired (little wonder, given how long it takes to load the barrels), Reichardt’s understanding of this era is far removed from the Wild West of Sam Peckinpah.
But while the film may be short on action, its director knows exactly how to eek out tension – notably when the families are trying to gradually lower a wagon down a steep slope, with every creek of the wheels utterly agonizing.
Featuring a credible support cast (Shirley Henderson, Paul Dano and Will Patton), who all look suitably dirty and disheveled, the film reeks of authenticity throughout.
But what really impresses is Reichardt’s feel for the Great American landscape – a skill we’ve already seen to some extent in
Wendy and Lucy
and its predecessor
Shot in the 1.33 aspect ratio, which presents the harsh and dusty desert vistas in a square frame, natural light illuminates the scenes, lending a suitably bleak look to proceedings.
Yes, its old fashioned. But expertly crafted,
is the work of a major filmmaker whose just found a larger canvas to paint on.
More Venice 2010
That arch provocateur Vincent Gallo is back. Not once but three times. Expect the Lido to start trembling.
To come over the next three days, we have his own directorial efforts, short film
, and competition entry
Promises Written In Water
, his first feature since the much-maligned
The Brown Bunny.
But first there is an acting performance in someone else’s movie – Jerzy Skolimowski’s
. And, it must be said, what a performance.
He plays Mohammed, a member of the Taliban who begins the movie by firing a rocket launcher into three American soldiers in Afghanistan.
As he runs from the scene of the crime, a US helicopter rains bullets down on him before he’s captured, interrogated and then transferred into Europe.
Handcuffed and blindfolded, and wearing one of those familiar Guantanamo-style orange jumpsuits, he’s bundled into a truck – only for it to run off the road.
From here on in,
is all about Mohammad’s escape through a snowy wilderness.
It’s the ultimate survival story, as the character gets chased by dogs, tumbles off a cliff and is forced to eat ants and a raw fish to survive.
There’s even a scene where he’s so desperate for food, he launches himself upon a buxom mother breastfeeding her baby by the side of the road and begins to suckle. Eew.
Mohammad is no Rambo, which is what makes his desperate attempt at survival fascinating. But what really will blow you away is the film is almost without dialogue.
Either alone in scenes or unable to communicate with anyone, Gallo has no lines at all. Only the words of US interrogators and soldiers are left ringing in your ears.
Really, the film is a sensory experience. The bearded Gallo shivers, yelps and screams his way through the film in what may be his only chance to ever play an action man.
Quite what point Skolimowski is making is open to debate, given he offers little by way of commentary on the US invasion of Afghanistan.
Yet he directs it with such pacing, precision and power, this story of just how far a human will go to survive is unquestionably gripping.
Now we just have to see what Gallo will deliver when his own film screens tomorrow. Brace yourself.
If French film director François Ozon can be very hit-and-miss, his delightful new comedy
is most definitely a hit.
Reuniting with Catherine Deneuve, with whom he worked on his 2002 film
could easily be re-titled ‘1 Woman’.
In fact, the title refers to French slang for female arm-candy, a phrase frequently used to describe wives of politicians.
, which Ozon has “freely adapted” (according to the credits) from a play by Barillet and Grédy, Deneuve’s character Suzanne could be just this.
A “trophy housewife”, as she calls herself, she is the “queen of kitchen appliances” – something she’s none to pleased with.
A mother of two grown-up children, living in Sainte-Gudule in the north of France, in 1977, her husband Robert (Fabrice Luchini) runs a factory previously owned by her late father.
A sexist (“your job is to share my opinion”, he tells his wife) and a serial philanderer, Robert also rules the family business with an iron fist.
But when the workers go on strike, even kidnapping Robert for a time, it’s left up to Suzanne to smooth things over.
This she does with the help of the town’s mayor Babin (Gérard Depardieu), a former truck driver who the seemingly perfect Suzanne once had a fling with.
What follows, as Suzanne usurps her husband, is proof that she is – to coin the title of the Bee Gees record that plays in the background in one scene – more than a woman.
, with its jaunty score, campy tone and bright primary colour palette,
has the flavour of a 1970s sitcom farce – albeit one about the sexual revolution.
Ozon clearly has great affection for his leading lady, not least in the reference to her classic
The Umbrellas of Cherbourg
, in a scene where the factory begins producing umbrellas on Suzanne’s watch.
Deneuve reciprocates with a very game turn – everything from the opening sequence as she jogs through the forest to a disco scene with Depardieu that lives long in the memory.
What really impresses about
, though, is the craft and care that Ozon has paid to his script. The set-ups are smart, the dialogue well-honed and the pay-offs worth the wait.
After his recent efforts, like
, which somewhat went awry, this is top-form Ozon – a sure-fire hit.
Now almost half way through the festival, Tran Anh Hung’s
must be one of the strong contenders for the Golden Lion.
Adapted from the 1987 novel by Japanese author Haruki Murakami, it’s a beautifully crafted story of life, love and death set in Tokyo in the late 1960s, at a time of great political upheaval.
The story follows Watanabe (Kenichi Matsuyama) and Naoko (Rinko Kikuchi), student lovers bonded over the tragic suicide of their friend from years earlier.
Yet when the outgoing Midori (Kiko Mizuhara) walks into their lives, Watanabe’s head is turned and he finds himself with a heart-wrenching choice.
If this love-triangle sounds all-too-common, the attention to detail that Vietnamese director Hung brings to the narrative makes it a compelling watch.
Admittedly it’s slow – sometimes gruellingly so – but it’s so beautifully shot by Mark Lee Ping Bin, every frame radiating craftsmanship, that it’s hard not to fall for it.
Curiously, there’s even a British input, from Jonny Greenwood, Radiohead’s floppy-haired guitarist (the band’s classic ‘Creep’ previously featured in Hung’s 1995 Golden Lion winner
While it doesn’t quite match the majesty of his work on Paul Thomas Anderson’s
There Will Be Blood
, he still conjures a score of tremendous power, one that alternates between tenderness and fear.
Greenwood’s contributions even stretch as far as suggesting the German band Can, who feature on the soundtrack.
And, yes, you do get to hear that wonderful Beatles’ track that inspired the title. As John Lennon once sung, ‘Isn’t it good? Norwegian Wood.’ You bet it is.
More Venice 2010
The last time Sofia Coppola was in Venice, it was proved a very happy experience.
Lost in Translation
captivated audiences and set her on a path to an Oscar.
Her new film
certainly bears comparison. Another story about loneliness, also set in a hotel, again there’s a whiff of autobiography about it.
Lost in Translation
felt like an oblique commentary on Coppola’s marriage to Spike Jonze, this could be read as a nod to her relationship with her famous film director father, Francis.
You also can’t help but wonder which Hollywood star the main protagonist, adrift A-list actor Johnny Marco (Stephen Dorff), is modelled on.
Living out an empty existence in the Chateau Marmont hotel, when we first meet Johnny, his idea of entertainment is hiring two blonde pole dancers to perform in his room.
Everywhere he goes, women from his past seem to float by (and you have to wonder if it’s a scorned one-night stand who keeps sending him abusive anonymous text messages).
His is a very unreal existence – until his 11 year-old daughter Cleo (Elle Fanning) arrives to stay with him while her mother disappears to take some time for herself.
As they gradually begin to bond, Johnny comes to realise just how shallow his life is – emphasized in one of Coppola’s less subtle moments when the pair play The Police’s ‘So Lonely’ on Guitar Hero.
That’s not to say
isn’t funny. Coppola has a sly sense of humour – and the moment where Johnny is forced to fend off dim-witted questions (“Would you like to go to China?”) at a press conference certainly resonated with all the hacks in the audience.
Though less stylized than her earlier work,
is still recognizably a Coppola film, with its sparse dialogue, too-cool-for-school soundtrack, and familiar themes of isolation.
Having touched on the notion of fame before, when he played Fifth Beatle Stuart Sutcliffe in Backbeat, Dorff is excellent in a role he was clearly born to play, never over-selling the character to us.
What might disappoint is that Coppola has hardly pushed herself towards breaking new boundaries – but then, arguably, she’s just not that sort of director.
In the press conference, she noted that her father saw the film and said to her, “You should always make the films only you can make.” Well, it looks like she has.
Today was John Woo day. I’m not sure what this means.
Were we all expected to dive around the Lido in slow-motion, while holding two guns and letting off endless rounds of bullets, as doves soared above us? I hope not, as I really didn’t have the time.
In fact, the director of
is here to collect a lifetime achievement Golden Lion for a body of work that stretches back over four decades.
At least it gives the festival the chance to show Woo’s latest
Reign of Assassins
(co-directed with Su Chao-Pin), his second Chinese-set movie in a row after
A wuxia-style martial arts actioner, and a concerted attempt to revive the Chinese swordplay genre, it stars Michelle Yeoh as a deadly assassin trying to atone for her sins and live a normal life.
In truth, after the likes of Ang Lee’s
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
, which also starred Yeoh, and Zhang Yimou’s
House of Flying Daggers
, while it’s made with considerable panache, Woo’s film feels overly familiar.
Characters bounce up and over walls (including one naked girl with just a wrap protecting her modesty) , swords stop within a hair’s breadth of an assailant’s eyeball, and Yeoh – now 48 – proves as agile as ever.
Woo aside, there’s a strong Asian presence here this year. We’ve already been treated to Infernal Affairs director Andrew Lau’s fast-flowing L
egend of the Fist: The Return of Chen Zhen
, which stars Donnie Yen as the mythical Hong Kong action hero (previously played by Bruce Lee and Jet Li).
And to come, Woo’s old compatriot Tsui Hark will be presenting
, in which Andy Lau plays an exiled detective who returns to solve a series of mysteries that threaten to delay the inauguration of Empress Wu.
But today – a day when the Heavens opened with one of the most vicious storms the Lido has ever seen – belongs to John Woo.
After the might of his last film,
The Diving Bell and The Butterfly
, Julian Schnabel’s latest
has to go down as a disappointment.
Adapted from her own book by Rula Jebreal, it tells the true story of three generations of women living in Jerusalem, just as the Israeli-Palestine conflict fills their everyday lives with violence and pain.
It begins in 1947, when the kindly Hind Husseini (
’s Hiam Abbas) discovers 55 orphan Palestinian children walking the streets and takes them in.
Within six months, the numbers have swelled to 200 – and Husseini’s house has become the Dar Tifl Al-Arabi Institute. “My goal is to educate these kids,” she says, “and give them hope.”
After a brief sequence set in ’67, at the time of the 6 Day War, the plot switches to one of Husseini’s charges, the 7 year-old Miral (Yolanda El-Karam), whose story dominates the second half of the film.
With her name meaning “small red flower,” there to emphasize the universality of her story, she arrives at Husseini’s establishment after the death of her mother.
Skipping on a decade to 1987, Miral (now played by Freida Pinto) is caught up in the political conflict that rages outside the sanctuary of the Institute – not least after she falls for a political activist.
While the director’s intentions are clearly honourable – he dedicates the movie to those in search of peace – the film is beset by problems, notably with the characters often feeling like mouthpieces for political soundbites.
star Pinto also seems miscast as Miral (although she does the best she can with a role that leaves her stranded). And there are strangely pointless cameos for Willem Dafoe and Vanessa Redgrave.
While Abbas is warm and moving in her role, it doesn’t help that her wig, when she plays the aging Husseini in the 1987 segment, makes her look like Norman Bates’ ‘mother’ in
There are touches of Schnabel’s sharp visual style – the camera bouncing up and down on a bed, for example, as it simulates the rape of one character. There’s also an intriguing use of Roman Polanski’s
, during a terrorist attack.
But with Schnabel deploying stock footage to give us a potted history of the region, it feels like he attempts to cover far too much ground.
The result? A film that lacks focus, boasting too many heroines.
came another film set in the Middle East,
– the fourth film from the Quebec-born filmmaker Denis Villeneuve.
The moment the film opens, the first scene cut to Radiohead’s brooding track 'You and Whose Army?', you could sense this was going to pack considerable punch – and it doesn’t disappoint.
Adapted from the play by Wajdi Mouawad, which was partly inspired by the war that shattered Lebanon in the 1970s, the story begins as twins Jeanne (Mélissa Désormeaux-Poulin) and Simon (Maxim Gaudette), who’ve been raised in Canada, discover their late mother’s final wish.
Given two envelopes – one for their father they thought was dead, one for a brother they never knew existed – they are entrusted to seek out the recipients and deliver the letters before they are allowed to engrave their mother’s tombstone.
As their notary puts it, “Death is never the end of the story. It always leaves traces” – a statement that grows in truth as both siblings journey to the war-torn tiny village where their mother grew up to try and find their father and brother.
Cutting between their detective work and scenes of their mother Nawal (Lubna Azabal) before they were born, what follows is a rich and complex mix of the personal and the political that is as shocking as it is engrossing.
While it would be unwise to give too much away, Nawal’s own journey is harrowing to say the least – from the moment she is berated by her grandmother for being pregnant to the scene where her bus is attacked by right-wing Christian militias.
In truth, the film’s ultimate revelation is a little hard to swallow (impossible to explain here without giving it all away), and threatens to undo much of the good work that has gone before it.
But Villeneuve keeps the past-present structure in perfect balance, aided by a string of first-rate performances – in particular Azabal, previously best known for her work in the 2006 film
It feels like the film Schnabel should’ve made.
Day Zero - Day One
Clever, chilling and above all compelling, Darren Aronofsky’s
marks the perfect start to this year’s Venice.
Last time Aronofsky was on the Lido,
walked away with the Golden Lion. This time, he has the honour of opening the festival.
couldn’t be further away from the tear-stained heartbreak of
. If anything, it’s the closest thing he’s made to his sophomore film,
Requiem For a Dream
A psychological thriller set in the world of the ballet, if Robert Altman’s
had been re-made by David Cronenberg that might come close to describing Black Swan.
In the lead is Natalie Portman, in arguably her most mature role to date. She plays Nina, a New York ballerina who lands the plum role of the Swan Queen in her company’s new production of Swan Lake.
A fragile innocent who still lives at home, her bedroom overflowing with fluffy toys, Nina may be perfect casting as the White Swan.
But, as her manipulative artistic director (Vincent Cassel) puts it, “the real work will be your metamorphosis into her evil twin”.
Aronofsky gradually essays this transformation, at times brilliantly, as Nina increasingly allows the role to get under her skin.
It doesn’t help that in Lily (Mila Kunis), a rebellious newcomer to the company, Nina has her “evil twin” right there, ready to lead her astray into the Manhattan night.
As the pressure begins to tell, Nina starts hallucinating – whether its paintings moving, tattoos shimmering or her own skin peeling off before her very eyes.
Portman is marvelous in meltdown mode, a perfect mixture of the prim and the paranoid, as she lives up to her mother’s suggestion that “this role is destroying you”.
But there are other great turns too. Cassel is wonderful slimy and, in little more than a cameo, Winona Ryder is deeply unsettling as Nina’s embittered predecessor.
The result is a triumphant piece from Aronofsky – part horror, part coming-of-age drama – that more than merits its opening night berth.
If the pen is mightier than the sword, clearly nobody told Robert Rodriguez.
kicks serious ass from start to finish.
It won’t hold too many surprises for those who saw the fake trailer that featured in
, the Rodriguez-Quentin Tarantino B-movie double-bill.
Rodriguez regular Danny Trejo finally takes centre stage (and about time, I’d say) as the machete-boasting Mexican who fights the good fight.
There’s even room for Cheech Marin, who featured in the original trailer as the shotgun-heavy Padre with the killer line, “God has mercy. I don’t.”
But a single trailer does not a film make, and Rodriguez has expanded this one-note idea into a hilarious ‘Mexploitation’ movie that feels like the perfect partner to his
The hilarious prologue sets the tone, as Machete busts in to rescue a girl (naked, of course), by hacking any head, arm or leg that gets in his way with his lethal weapon.
It doesn’t stop there as blood splatters across the screen with alarming regularity – the stand-out grisly moment arguably coming when Machete uses one luckless assailant’s intestine as a rope swing.
isn’t all cartoon sex-and-violence – with its plot seeing a Texas senator (Robert De Niro) determined to build an electrified fence along the Mexican border to keep out illegal immigrants.
Featuring Jessica Alba as an immigration officer who teams up with Machete, much of the cast is deliciously retro – everyone from Steven Seagal as a Mexican druglord to Don Johnson as a gun-happy sheriff and Jeff Fahey as a ruthless businessman.
While it feels like
rather stole Rodriguez’s thunder there, he does get to offer redemption for off-screen bad-girls Michelle Rodriguez and Lindsay Lohan, who gets a particularly memorable moment involving a nun’s habit and a .44 Magnum.
But the true star is Trejo. He may be more crinkled than a bag of prunes, but he’s spot-on as this new kind of superhero.
As the finale says, ‘Machete Will Return’. After this effervescent effort, let’s hope Rodriguez isn’t joking.
Greetings from the Lido! As Total Film gears up to bring you our coverage of the 67th Venice Film Festival, the signs are good.
For starters, it seems like jury head Quentin Tarantino has stuck his oar in. His old mate Robert Rodriguez provides one of three opening films, in the shape of Grindhouse-trailer-turned-feature
Meanwhile, Tarantino’s old favourite John Woo is receiving a Golden Lion for lifetime achievement, which means public screenings of Woo classics
A Better Tomorrow
What else to look out for? Well, the official opening film, Darren Aronofsky’s
, a psychological thriller set in the world of the New York ballet, is a must-see.
Ben Affleck’s second directorial effort, and his second Boston-set crime drama,
looks intriguing, as does Sofia Coppola’s potentially indulgent
, starring Stephen Dorff and Elle Fanning.
I also can’t wait to see Monte Hellman’s
Road to Nowhere
, a new film from the maestro behind such ’70s classics as
Two Lane Blacktop
Most intriguing film will surely be
I’m Still Here
, Casey Affleck’s documentary about Joaquin Phoenix’s transition from actor to rapper.
And with Vincent Gallo back with his new film
Promises Written In Water
(as well as an appearance in
), controversy won’t be far away.
It all adds up to a tasty-looking selection. Stay tuned for daily reports.