Google+

We Recommend

46 comments

  • sabian4005 - May 26, 2010 11:48 p.m.

    Now, I'm not defending WoW, but I can say without a doubt that the graphics you displayed in those images are not on any of the highest settings. It's a six year old game and showing it's age, this is true, but Bliz did try to up the graphical prowess with WotLK. The most obvious mistake is that none of the characters in those pictures have shadows, so no, your graphics were not on "high". Anyway I quit WoW a while ago for lack of time, but seriously if your going to compare apples to apples graphically, at least support your claim with the settings really maxed out.
  • Ridgley - May 26, 2010 11:18 p.m.

    It's not hard to look better than WoW. Also, Allods looks like a WoW clone art wise.
  • rav3 - May 26, 2010 11:15 p.m.

    guild wars is, totally, without a question
  • Doctalen - May 26, 2010 11:05 p.m.

    My only question is are any of these actually good?
  • Jesse1066 - May 26, 2010 11:01 p.m.

    Yet they might also benefit from having higher settings that actually look good.
  • hagelbreaker - May 26, 2010 10:46 p.m.

    The lower graphics requirements the more people can play WoW and therefore more money to Blizzard.

Showing 41-46 of 46 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.