• vanillafever - November 16, 2012 12:30 p.m.

    hehe, I laughed. But aside from that, I am enjoying the game so far.
  • AuthorityFigure - November 16, 2012 6:50 p.m.

    These people are confused about what they dislike - the game itself can't be as bad as they make out, so it is their dislike of the Call of Duty brand that they're complaining about. They just don't know how to be honest about it.
  • Dmastaj187 - November 16, 2012 11:52 p.m.

    No it's not. I love call of duty because it is the only game I can get on and actually laugh with my friends about. This call of duty lacks anything that made the ones in the past actually playable
  • AuthorityFigure - November 17, 2012 3:40 p.m.

    Are you really calling this game 'unplayable'?
  • nisan34 - November 17, 2012 4:13 a.m.

    so to buy this game or not? i like FPS games and i have MW3. will i see any differences from MW3?
  • brickman409 - November 19, 2012 7:59 p.m.

    yeah there's a surprising amount of differences from MW3 to black ops II. The class creating system has changed a lot, the campaign has multiple endings and the zombies mode is a lot bigger.
  • HaVoK308 - November 17, 2012 7:38 p.m.

    Like it? Too busy loving Halo 4. You know, a quality title.
  • chiz - November 18, 2012 12:46 p.m.

    I'm usually one of those guys who says every call of duty game is the same (and most of them are) but i tried black ops 2 the other day and i found it was a lot different than any of the other games. The weapons are creative and unique, and the maps are quite fun
  • D0CCON - November 18, 2012 1:02 p.m.

    I love how these people call websites like GR, IGN, Gamespot, etc. biased and then they go out and do this to every high-profile game.
  • Divine Paladin - November 18, 2012 1:47 p.m.

    At least THIS time you used ACTUAL nonsensical reviews.
  • Brutus - November 18, 2012 7:10 p.m.

    where the heck did the halo version of this run off to? I was going to show it to my roommate. Did you guys take it down for some reason?
  • GamingBear - November 19, 2012 4:09 a.m.

    On the topic of nonsensical and ridiculous reviews someone on amazon gave a top end tv 1 out of 5 starts for not the tv itself (they said it was good) but for problems registering with the companies, optional, help service. Needless to say I berated them for this
  • mothbanquet - November 20, 2012 7:18 a.m.

    Watch out GR journos; these guys are after your jobs...
  • ZeeCaptain - November 20, 2012 4:13 p.m.

    This is hilarious, I can't say much for black ops 2 or the one before that, really the last one I bought for a reason besides it's what my friends are playing would be CoD 3, I can't say I agree with these "reviews" I think what CoD is doing is a different direction from what I liked but it's a game for those adrenaline jockeys who like to be the hero, I mean that is what CoD is now, it used to be your just a solider in a mass of soliders who die and re-spawn while you take your merry time to clear an objective, the only thing separating you from the others was a load of competence, but now you'r an action hero with a goofy name that does suicide missions and comes out dashing with heroism dripping from his glistening muscles.... I digress, I know old CoD wasn't the greatest but now a days I'll play an online match were it's one guy who's really good and a bunch of five year olds who are cussing me out. In my opinion CoD is moving farther away from the core elements of a shooter and is more about telling a story of an unlikely war where a hero does some shooting and everything turns out dandy, but the so called realism they put in to these really only appeal too a demograph of people who play for the multiplayer and people who think this is what war and killing is like, i.e. people who play GTA as a training for what's too come.
  • zombi3grim - November 26, 2012 10:01 a.m.

    Look, hes back! Your still not understanding this simple concept. Take what you just said with the quotes "I think we need to break up." Now, thats it! No context! You dont get to know that his girlfriend left slamming the door shut! "Slamming" indicates anger! All you get from me is the quote "I think we need to break up." Because THAT is how Im typing to you. Im not providing you any context. The only time you dont need adjectives is if your providing a situation such as "slamming a door" or "glaring." Those are descriptors. Now, sifting through all of your insults, this boils down to yet again, this going WAY over your head! Just stop! Give it up! You lost this a long time ago. Let it die.
  • winner2 - November 26, 2012 11:28 a.m.

    You apparently aren't able to keep up with your own argument. You claim that one needs adjectives to determine emotion. I disagreed. I provided an example situation where no adjectives are included, to demonstrate that you (yes, even you) should be capable if deducing emotion without adjectives from text. Also, you skirted my question. I asked you how the girlfriend feels, and you failed to give me an answer. I believe you failed to do this because you are afraid of admitting you're wrong. Just admit that you have a problem, that's the first step in defeating it. I mean, you are wrong in your arguments here. That's the word, yes, as crazy as it sounds to you, you are wrong. You are not right, you are wrong, and both I and another have now tried and failed to get you to understand why. You are making yourself look like just another average adult who can't prove they took much of anything away from a higher education with every effort you make to dig yourself into denial. If you want proof you can't "logically" refuse, show this entire argument, starting at the comment where I agreed with the gentleman who's post I supported, to 3 English professors willing to give you a few minutes of their time. If you are willing to do that (it can probably be done online so don't worry about your time), I hope you are prepared to be told you are in need of some remedial tutoring.
  • zombi3grim - November 26, 2012 2:38 p.m.

    Read what i saif. I said adjectives without context. I gave you no context. You didnt get to know if i was slamming a door or glaring because i never told you. Im not wrong. Im right for the simple fact you STILL cannot tell me how you defer anger from my post with no adjectives, no descriptors and no context. THAT is what i said. Try again little boy. You should of let this die when u had the chance.

Showing 101-120 of 131 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000


Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.