Google+

We Recommend By ZergNet

8 comments

  • acim-pesut - November 1, 2013 7:41 p.m.

    I loved CoD2 and CoD4, i have over 1000hours on both games, and i played the campaing 3x times each. CoD2 was simple, pick a weapon and kill, CoD4 was even better, pick a weapon, add a silancer and kill. Large maps, custom mods, custom weapons, custom maps, 64 players. It was awesome. And then MW2 came out. No mods. No large maps. A FREEKING NUKE as a kill strike that ends the map. I never gave money for CoD game ever again. I check out the multyplayer when its free on steam but its just 2 stupid. After quitting CoD, I started playing Bad Company 2. And after that BF3. I can't play BF4 cuz my PC is old but when i upgrade it I will get BF4. Cuz Dice made a brilliant game. NEW GAME. BF:1942 is not the same as BC. BC is not the same as BC2. BF3 isn't the same as BC2. BF4 isn't the same as BF3. It gets better with every new game. CoD is the same game since MW2. And that was 4 years ago. CoD:Ghost is one of the most stupidest things i have ever seen. The only think that CoD had good since CoD4, was the Zombie mod. But this new thing with aliens?! WTF?! Srsly?! Aliens in CoD? Wow, just wow. BF4 beats Ghost hands down. Get your shit together CoD untill you go full Duke Nukem forver on your self. You are real close to it with this one
  • JustAnotherRogueAI - October 31, 2013 4:59 p.m.

    After enjoying Battlfield 3 for countless hours (and picking up BF4 the other day) I can honestly say that I will personally never buy a CoD game again. Sure, I'll probably still end up playing them with friends who're absolutely addicted, but I will never spend my own money on them. Call me a fanboy all you want, but Battlefield is just better in every aspect, and that will always remain true unless some major changes are made at Activision.
  • adam-james-knight - October 31, 2013 4:52 p.m.

    CoD2 all the way - Nothing beats the big maps to support snipers, and the enclosed areas for CQB. That game supported every weapon style and lead to amazing multiplayer gameplay. I think each CoD release takes the quality of multiplayer down a massive hit each time with tiny maps that support and promote RnG noobs.
  • adam-james-knight - October 31, 2013 4:57 p.m.

    Saying that, World at War was very good also! But nothing could beat a MP match with up to 64 players on PC with CoD2!
  • Brett35 - October 31, 2013 9:45 a.m.

    MW2 is easily the best online experience I've ever had and still remains the golden standard to which I compare any other game. I still consistently play it today even though finding a hardcore moshpit lobby is way too long of a wait.
  • db1331 - October 31, 2013 6:41 a.m.

    And I'm not a BF fanboy just bashing CoD. I enjoy CoD as well, and will still get Ghosts.
  • genocide87 - October 31, 2013 6 a.m.

    COD2 was the best, it's the best, it remain the best forever.
  • db1331 - October 31, 2013 6:41 a.m.

    I couldn't tell you how many hours I spent in MP on the rooftops of Toujane with my bolt action rifle in C0D2. It was great, but I still think CoD4 is better. Having said that, after a few hours with BF4, there's just no way Ghosts will even come close to matching it. I was on the aircraft carrier on Paracel Storm last night and I thought back to the Carrier map on Black Ops 2. It's like they are 10 years apart in terms of quality, even though Ops 2 came out less than a year ago. I mean, look at what happened to me in BF4 last night. I've spent thousands of hours in online shooters, and this is one of my biggest "OH SHIT" moments ever: http://youtu.be/h9fDk2XEoP8

Showing 1-8 of 8 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.