Google+

Starhawk review

Great
AT A GLANCE
  • The multiplayer madness
  • Flying, driving and blowing the crap out of everything
  • The co-op horde mode
  • Shoddy AI in the campaign
  • The story mode is short
  • Not being on a well organized team

Starhawk is the spiritual successor to 2007's chaotic, multiplayer-driven Warhawk. This update adds real-time strategy elements, a single player campaign and its own version of horde mode. With these new additions, the third person action game takes on an even more unique identity all its own. RTS elements add layers of depth and the multiple game modes provide plenty of variety. The short single-player campaign will get you started and the complex gameplay mechanics of the various multiplayer modes will keep you coming back to perfect your tactics.

Warhawk was notorious for having a steep learning curve for those trying to compete with the pros in the multiplayer. To help relieve some of that frustration, Starhawk provides a story campaign that feels like a long tutorial. The short, but entertaining story plays off a Wild-West-In-Space theme that makes for some interesting, frontier-like environments. Cargo star ships reflect the design of a train, characters wear bolo ties, and even dusty, backwater towns show up from time to time.

In the space cowboy world, civilization revolves around rifts – dangerous sources of energy that earn prospectors a pretty penny. The problem is, anyone exposed to the rift energy becomes a corrupted humanoid monster called a Scab and the Scabs constantly raid Rift Jumpers to take the energy for themselves. A rift salvager named Emmett plays the hero, clearing out Scabs from raided rift wells and making a living off the contracts.

The story mainly plays out in animated cutscenes between levels and is interesting enough to pull you through the short five-hour campaign, but there's nothing that is particularly memorable about it. We ran into some spotty AI from companion characters that left them disappearing at random or endlessly running on walls. There were also a few ugly looking indoor areas that tarnished otherwise impressive, stylized visuals. Other than that, the campaign does a great job at teaching players how to use the base building system and the control the various vehicles. So, once you get done with the campaign, you are ready to jump right into Starhawk's main event, the multiplayer.

Capture the flag, deathmatch, team deathmatch, and Zones (which has teams capture points on the map to build their team score) make up Stahawk's multiplayer modes. The added RTS gameplay mechanics make multiplayer much deeper than it was in Warhawk. Rather than find weapons, ammo, and vehicles scattered around the map, players will have to build structures that spawn these upgrades. Defensive walls and turrets can also be constructed, which comes in handy for protecting the team flag and creating choke points. This also makes teamwork all the more important when going up against a well organized opposing team. Communication and strategy is almost essential to getting a win, since plenty of time and resources can be wasted if everyone on a team ends up building the same structures. Killing enemies and performing accolades like landing a drop pod on an enemy's head earn experience points, which can be used to unlock character skins and passive skills.

The greatest strength to Starhawk's multiplayer is it supports diverse playstyles and all of them are fun. Defensive players can spend time building bases around team flags and domination points while offensive players can jump in a vehicle and ride head-on into the fray. Vehicles like the Ox heavy tank provide an insane advantage in firepower, while the Hawks have you zipping around the map bombing enemy bases and dogfighting for air superiority. One of the coolest things about the title's namesake vehicle, the Hawks, is they transform from a speedy jet to a walking mech on command - enabling players to decimate infantry and fly off when things get too hairy. Although, we found ourselves hopping in vehicles to stay competitive, being on foot doesn’t mean you'll be completely helpless. Rocket launchers and grenades stand up against most vehicles, ensuring one player in a tank won’t be able to dominate an entire team.

We found ourselves enthralled with the multiplayer and had a blast causing as much chaos as possible. Every vehicle controls well and the shooting works as well as any other third person shooter. It does become a bit disappointing when we were placed on a team that didn't work well together, since that basically guarantees getting scraped. But Starhawk does make it very easy to create clans, with a built in creation and invitation system and clan calendars which is sure to please hardcore players.

Outside the standard multiplayer, co-op allows up to four players to fight waves of Scabs in a Starhawk version of horde mode. Rather than having to stay alive, protecting a rift well with select building options is the main priority. Each co-op match only lasts for ten rounds which is somewhat disappointing, but defending the rift with a few friends is a great diversion from multiplayer and a fun way to earn some extra experience points.

Starhawk is one of the most unique multiplayer experiences we played in a long time. The RTS elements create significant strategic depth and the action is a blast. Once we got a hang of the somewhat complicated gameplay systems of building bases and driving the various vehicles we didn't want to put the controller down. If you've been looking for engrossing, chaotic, large-scale multiplayer battles, Starhawk is going to satisfy your needs. 

More Info

Release date: May 08 2012 - PS3 (US)
Available Platforms: PS3
Genre: Shooter
Published by: Sony Computer Entertainment
ESRB Rating:
Teen: Blood, Language, Violence

We Recommend By ZergNet

16 comments

  • TheWebSwinger - May 8, 2012 11:21 p.m.

    Great video reiview! Wthi content like that, I have even less reason to go to one ooooooooooother sites. Love you gamesradar, and so glad to have Chris back : )
  • BladedFalcon - May 8, 2012 9:42 p.m.

    Props for the video review guys! You can bet it didn't go unnoticed! And extra kudos as always for having Chris Antista do the talking! XD Also, Chris, if you were the one that thought to throw in that Firefly theme and comparison, then God bless you, that was beautiful.
  • robotdickens - May 8, 2012 12:52 a.m.

    I wonder if there is one game you guys haven't given a single 'con' to. I mean, I'm not bagging you about your ratings, I'm just curious.
  • BladedFalcon - May 8, 2012 9:35 p.m.

    I don't specifically recall which game. But I am pretty sure there is at least one game in which all the cons they gave were kinda jokey, and obviously there in order to fill the spaces XD
  • IceBlueKirby - May 7, 2012 3:59 p.m.

    Whoah, wait, a multiplayer only game got a sequel with a single-player component? Is today opposite day or something?
  • therawski - May 7, 2012 10:39 a.m.

    Yeah... I don't trust this review. I know the beta was horrific (although still just a beta) but I can't imagine that they fixed it's problems.
  • superkiwi24 - May 7, 2012 2:27 p.m.

    you must have heard wrong, because the beta was great, and they made it even better.
  • sicdedworm - May 7, 2012 8:36 p.m.

    the beta was great. you do know they put in hotfixes pretty quickly right? anything unbalanced is fixed in a matter of hours when the devs get the data. i trust dylan jobe when he said the retail game will feel completely different from the beta. i mean, it was a beta lol
  • Wolfman3000 - May 7, 2012 9:26 a.m.

    mine is preordered already. It's not out until 11/05/12 in the UK though.
  • WINNER: Dark Souls - May 8, 2012 6:58 a.m.

    November?? That really is ridiculous. :/
  • GenMasterB - May 8, 2012 4:27 p.m.

    that's the European way to format date. it's May 11th, not 11-5 as you read it..
  • TristanPR77 - May 7, 2012 8:50 a.m.

    I wasn't expecting the single player to be great, I was hoping the multiplayer is and by what I have seen in many different reviews they all agree the multiplayer stand out by itself, even IGN gave it a 9.0. So, I am getting the game tomorrow.
  • BladedFalcon - May 7, 2012 7:23 a.m.

    I was looking forward to this one because they initially claimed the single player would stand on it's own. Knowing however, that it's not much more than a glorified tutorial for the multiplayer, I'll skip it.
  • bebl09 - May 7, 2012 9:22 a.m.

    Same, while I know it's more of a multiplayer-focused game I still had high hopes for the single-player. I do still want to play it but I'll wait till it goes down in price cause it does look pretty cool.
  • taokaka - May 7, 2012 6:27 a.m.

    sounds great, I 'll have to get this down the line with one of my mates and give it a shot even though that they dropped four player splitscreen.
  • Hobogonigal - May 7, 2012 7:23 a.m.

    It does sound like a great game but it is a real shame there is no 4-player splitscreen. I guess it'll have to be Warhawk for some good, sleep deprived fun at 3 in the morning.

Showing 1-16 of 16 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.