• Doctalen - June 4, 2014 5:05 a.m.

    The reasons that are stated in this article to make Homefront Revolution sound exciting and new sound really cliche. "You have to scout before a fight" huh wonder what games I've heard that before.... "End a fight before it even begins" hmmmm sounds familiar. I do like the idea behind this since its relatively a new concept but god damn, the developers could do something other than try and praise it with cliches.
  • KA87 - June 3, 2014 3:33 p.m.

    God No!!!!! While I thought the beginning of the first game was very good and really got you into the plight of living under this type of rule, but It quickly fell off a cliff after that. I think the concept is cool and is something that can and will be worked into a good game someday, but I don't think a sequel to this game will do that.
  • Jason Fanelli - June 2, 2014 7:42 p.m.

    The song "Philadelphia Freedom" by Elton John is going to be ALL OVER this game's marketing.
  • KA87 - June 3, 2014 3:44 p.m.

    If I was Elton John I would not let my brand be used to help sell burning bags of dog poo. "Come get a wiff of this folks we got burning bags of dog poo here. Only $60 a bag.Get them while there hot."
  • maskaraid - June 2, 2014 1:35 p.m.

    So let me get this straight, every bemoans the fact that the gaming industry runs off of big name games and their endless sequels that are very similar but as soon as a new name pops up they are quick to critically crucify it because its either not what they want or they think to a waste of time. This seems counter productive, if you want to see new brands and innovation then you have to support it. If you are not willing to at least show interest in a game that is going out of its way to bring up something new then you have no right to complain about the new call of duty being the same or any of those brands sequels.
  • Rojoco - June 2, 2014 3:18 p.m.

    But it's not a new name, it's a friggin' sequel. A near future military shooter sequel. That description ring any bells? This game does not scream innovation in any way.
  • maskaraid - June 2, 2014 10:29 p.m.

    It is a sequel to a game, however as i stated before its a relatively new brand and unlike the other big first person shooter brands this one cares about the single player experience and wanting to tell a cohesive and meaningful story that doesn't care much for multiplayer. The fact that companies are trying to get a foothold in the fps genre that isn't the umpteenth sequel of a brand should be nourished if you are one of those people who complain about the yearly call of duty games or the battlefield sequels or anything like that. The three points you made were pretty bland and cover a wide spectrum, would be like saying that mass effect 2 didn't do anything innovative since it was in the future and near is a relative term, you played as someone in the military who does spend a significant time shooting others and was a sequel.
  • petasz - June 2, 2014 10:11 a.m.

    I don't know, I really liked Homefront. For the story part at least.
  • winner2 - June 2, 2014 10:07 a.m.

    How What Why
  • Rhymenocerous - June 2, 2014 9:20 a.m.

    Sounds like the Freedom Fighters sequel I always wanted. Or at least as close as we'll ever get.
  • Rojoco - June 2, 2014 7:16 a.m.

    It's not TimeSplitters so no interest.

Showing 1-11 of 11 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000