• blam57 - October 6, 2010 7:10 p.m.

    first of all, the sequel was great, but to many familiar gameplay mechanics were in this, don't get me wrong the new drill and yoshi thing was exciting, but made me get bored quickly of this game, which is what I feared, and also they kinda made this games as epic as possible. So for now i'm wating on New Super Mario Bros 3 :D
  • Hotdiddykong - October 6, 2010 7:14 p.m.

    HD is what the game needs, the graphics are already beutiful Co-op would be nice but Mario's superstar games are single player and not meant to be a co-op. Having co-op would destroy the experience.
  • thefreakysurgeon - October 6, 2010 7:16 p.m.

    if Super Mario Galaxy 3 ever did come out, then it would be one of the greatest games ever, leaving its 2 prequels in the dust!
  • JADENkOTOR - October 6, 2010 7:18 p.m.

    Hell no... Luigi all the way.
  • Felixthecat - October 6, 2010 7:20 p.m.

    DLC? The Wii isn't an Xbox/PS3. "Look as good as a PS3 game"? That seems like an implication that SMG1/2 don't already look as good as PS3 games. I don't want a Super Mario Galaxy 3, I want Mario to go somewhere else, and I think that SMG2 was so awesome that you should just leave it at that. Of course, if SMG3 was ever made, then I certainly wouldn't be complaining at all, but it seems rather pointless seeing as SMG2 was so brilliant. I want to see the Mario series move on a little more from Space, but what Mario could do next is beyond me... Perhaps a Mario game that explores religion?
  • scottneve - October 6, 2010 7:20 p.m.

    Were you referring to the graphics in Ratchet as a compliment or as "oh gawd that game was so ugly! Don't let the next Mario look that bad!" Because Ratchet rocks in every way.
  • MyNameIsMyName - October 6, 2010 7:46 p.m.

    I'd like to see, Multiple Difficulties, and better, less childish power-ups
  • 510BrotherPanda - October 6, 2010 7:58 p.m.

    I think the Wii's successor still needs a better Luigi game. How can you say Luigi's Mansion was entirely garbage? Sure, it didn't have the rote Mario jump and power-up mechanics, but it was still decent for a launch game. Besides, it was mainly a showcase for Nintendo finally getting its ct together on better lighting mechanics. SMG 2 was great and all, but like others have said before, it still has the "SMG 1.5" feeling to it. Sure, there are many level innovations and the addition of Yoshi, but it's still very much just a bigger Mario Galaxy. Also, SMG 2 is probably the game I've sworn at the most. I used almost 80 lives just to complete the Stone Tornado Red Coin speed run challenge, and still haven't finished "the Perfect Run" yet... In comparison, I think Metroid Prime Trilogy was a bigger deal for me. Even if it's not as smooth and colorful as SMG, it captured the feeling of the Metroid series in the same way the SMGs did of the Mario series. It upgraded the first two games with the Wii FPS controls and was 3 games for the price of 1 1/2. Even putting it up against Other M, the intricacy of the door design alone outshone Other M's comparatively sterile environments. I'm not really a graphics whore because I don't have a PS3/360/gaming PC, but I don't think graphics should take as much precedence over solid controls and gameplay. So in summation: More good Luigi and Samus, less Mario games with just Mario.
  • CoryRX8 - October 6, 2010 8:10 p.m.

    Let's not skip to Universe just yet, that would box the series in. How about Super Mario Galactic Cluster, then Super Mario Galactic Supercluster, and so on...
  • 510BrotherPanda - October 6, 2010 8:30 p.m.

    ...And DLC and Co-Op? Are you trying to turn Nintendo into current Activision, and the Mario franchise into Call of Duty? I think long-time Nintendo fans would feel cheated if whatever was hidden was not already on the disc. By the time "Wii 2" is out, there should be no reason not to squeeze it all onto the disc. Why waste $5 just to dick around Galaxy in a Tanooki Suit, if it's optional and only works after play-through? I always thought Nintendo was 'in it' to satisfy Nintendo customers, not just for the money... Co-Op and DLC might not work for Nintendo unless they come out with that Pokemon MMO Brett and many other people want.
  • Felixthecat - October 6, 2010 8:38 p.m.

    @BrotherPanda - Throwing Luigi into a game does not make it immediately better. And anyway, both Mario Galaxies give you the ability to play as Luigi, so it doesn't matter.
  • GR_HenryGilbert - October 6, 2010 8:40 p.m.

    @scottneve I'm meant that while I find Galaxy more fun than Ratchet games, I wish that Mario could approach how great the RC PS3 games look.
  • johnthe5th - October 6, 2010 8:48 p.m.

    I'm pretty sure the next Galaxy game will be on the 3DS. And it will be called Super Mario Galaxy 3DS. Makes total sense.
  • ihopethisisnotantistasblood - October 6, 2010 9:05 p.m.

  • Aletheon - October 6, 2010 9:06 p.m.

    I turn on my Wii all the time.
  • ppopopp - October 6, 2010 9:06 p.m.

    I disagree with DLC for first party nintendo titles. It dilutes the impact that a game holds by itself. Vring on the 1.5s but please don't make me pay time and a half for content that normally would stand on its own.
  • batmanboy11 - October 6, 2010 10:25 p.m.

    Good list. These would all be damn good additions.
  • Pocotron - October 6, 2010 10:26 p.m.

    I don't want to see SMG3. At least for 5 years when the successor to the Wii launches. LIKE A REAL MARIO PLATFORMER GAME. What has happened to you, Mario????!!!
  • GammaGames - October 6, 2010 10:47 p.m.

    If it's Super Mario Universe, then add characters from other Nintendo games (Wario, Waluigi, Donkey Kong, Kirby, ect) Thats probably already commented, but I don't feel like reading through them all.
  • powerpc127 - October 7, 2010 12:08 a.m.

    I do not want DLC personally. Also, I don't want the words "Galaxy 3" attached to it.

Showing 1-20 of 67 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000