Google+

19 comments

  • Martfish - October 21, 2012 12:20 a.m.

    It's a video game about assassins doing free running. If you want historical accuracy read a damn book...
  • will-turner - October 18, 2012 9:44 a.m.

    They should have more balance, for example a major American who was a templar, or A Brit who was an Assasin. From a historical point of view the British didn't quite care enough at the time, or have the resources to properly fight the Americans, and were frankly more interested in Canada and The West Indies. Because of this the Brittish sent some really shitty generals to fight there, hence why they lost. It actually turned out pretty well for the Brits, who got to have more advantages from trade with the US, without stretching resources. The US won, but I wish Ubisoft would be more balanced. Imagine an American fighting one of his people, that's how we all feel.
  • GR_RyanTaljonick - October 18, 2012 10:36 a.m.

    Ubisoft has said countless times that it's not a one-sided thing. Connor's allegiance isn't to either the Patriots or the Loyalists--he's after justice, which means he'll probably be fighting Templars on both sides.
  • kingsmikefan - October 20, 2012 9:34 p.m.

    Really? Because Connor's been talking a lot about how "this country might finally be free" in the trailers. And I'm not too keen on the notion that the Americans represent justice and the Brits represent injustice so unequivocally. The first game did a good job of coating the story with moral ambiguity, but since then it's been a straightforward "kill bad guy" routine.
  • tompie - October 18, 2012 12:35 a.m.

    Meh, still kinda dissapointed about the setting in general. So I'll just play this one to kill people I guess xD
  • mattdark - October 18, 2012 12:27 a.m.

    Also not included is the death of any patriot/american at the hands of an assassin.
  • Stabby_Joe - October 18, 2012 5:54 a.m.

    Watch the most recent UK trailers, he massacres a whole group of Patriots and then some. Despite that, the UK are being NEUTRAL in their advertising. The US is a large market for video games, it's all been biased for marketing purposes.
  • StefanGrey - October 17, 2012 7:16 p.m.

    My biggest disappointment remains not a who, but a where. How can you make a game about the revolutionary war era and not include the economic, social and political capital of the colonies, Philadelphia?
  • GR HollanderCooper - October 18, 2012 8:02 p.m.

    FUCK YEAH! PHILADELPHIA! CHEESE STEAKS EAGLES *throws snowball*
  • redsoxfanman456 - October 19, 2012 5:19 a.m.

    if it makes you feel better, Connor will be in Philly but we won't be able to run around in it :/
  • austin128 - October 17, 2012 6:08 p.m.

    Aw man, I've been hoping for von Steuben for a while. It's simple: as your getting a mission from George Washington, you interact with Steuben in a cutscene, and then after that he's walking around interacting with NPC's, and could give missions. Maybe you could even help train troops to level up your soldiers or whatever. Also, I really hope slavery is given some attention.
  • Evanesco - October 17, 2012 6:13 p.m.

    Slavery is going to be largely ignored.
  • kingsmikefan - October 20, 2012 9:29 p.m.

    You didn't even read their explanation, did you? He didn't speak English, and they said it was weird to interact with a translator.
  • JMarsella09 - October 17, 2012 3:28 p.m.

    huh, I honestly expected Arnold.
  • Evanesco - October 17, 2012 2:31 p.m.

    I like Matt Turner. His interviews are always good stuff.
  • Thebigbob22934 - October 17, 2012 1:34 p.m.

    I'm wondering, will they include any of the southern events in AC:Liberation for the Vita? The New Orleans setting makes it sound more plausible.

Showing 1-19 of 19 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000