The Top 7... Classic gamer rivalries

Before Squaresoft and Enix joined forces to become Square Enix, they were rivals in the grand sport of JRPG (which we'll get to later). Their animosity stretched back to 1987, when Final Fantasy came out a year after Dragon Quest. Both games blew people's’ minds with their sheer enormity, but RPG fans of old still quickly picked a side, stuck with their choice, and tried to prove its superiority.

You’d think the merger would have killed this debate--they’re on the same team!--but it rages on. Dragon Quest faithful will always be able to argue that their series of choice came first--a solid point--but Final Fantasy fans have leverage because of their series’ massive popularity and sophisticated-slash-ridiculous storytelling. Where Dragon Quest fans love the series’ old-school charm, Final Fantasy players gravitate toward bombastic visuals and settings that are immediately impressive. Then again, Final Fantasy has also veered nearly into self-parody, with the latest two main entries receiving mixed reactions, while Dragon Quest continues to prosper, providing innovative takes on the series’ mainstays with each new game.

The finer points of a fragfest mean a lot to hardcore FPSheads--look no further than the argument between Call of Duty and Battlefield fans. Calls of Duty folks crave those tight corridors, those choice camp spots, and those frantic parts where you slam down the R3 button and run like hell for cover. They like maps you can get across in a minute or two, with copious amounts of intense, centralized action.

In other words, they hate everything that Battlefield games are about. Battlefield fanatics want a series that zooms the focus out from a single locale to a whole, er, battlefield. They savor the games’ slow, grand pace, and appreciate the less frequent combat as well as the inclusion of player-controlled vehicles. Battlefield players prefer mashing R3 to get across a field without a tank running them over. They’re same type of game, but they could barely be much different--and when their fans can manage to put down the controllers, they make for one of gaming’s most heated rivalries.

What’s better, gigantic swords or crazy-complicated conversation systems? Do you prefer to play as an amnesiac or a kid leaving home for the first time? These are the questions that fans of the two main RPG genres like to argue about. Japanese RPG fans swear by their charming, oft-complicated stories and fine-tuned turn-based combat systems. They want their hair colors weird, their armor impractical, and their antagonists androgynous. Western RPG fans demand open worlds and branching paths, love Tolkien-worship, and want nothing more than to spend a few hours in the character creator.

Recently, it’s become lop-sided. JRPGs are more niche than ever, with most quality titles coming out on Nintendo handhelds, while WRPGs have thrived by refining their combat. But don’t count the JRPG out. Developers have begun to innovate within the genre, with titles like Xenoblade Chronicles, The Last Story, and Final Fantasy XIII resulting in some of the era’s most unique games. Maybe the next generation will see the return of the blockbuster JRPG?

Horde and Alliance agree on one thing: World of Warcraft is the greatest MMORPG ever. The only issue is that every new MMORPG that gets announced is also slated to be the greatest MMORPG ever, and that game’s fans believe it with great conviction. There can’t be two greatest MMORPG ever. Thus, we argue.

Maybe marketing people should be more humble and stop calling things “WoW-killers.” Maybe World of Warcraft fans should admit the flaws in their game and compliment the things other games do well or could improve upon. Regardless, with WoW being such a landmark game, it’s an easy target for upcoming games trying to generate hype, so it takes a lot of abuse. It’s easy to see why its loyal denizens get defensive. Not to mention, everyone wants the game they absolutely cannot wait to play to be fantastic and crush all its opposition. It’s a potent recipe for conflict, and it’s given many a forum moderator gray hair. Relatively, the Battlegrounds are looking pretty tame.

If you didn’t get into a playground scuffle over this one, we’re taking your True Nerd Card. Just kidding... kind of. This is the rivalry that would define an entire generation, from your choice in patterned, branded pajamas to the highly-visible marketing wars between Sega and Nintendo.

If you’re a Mario fan, you’re probably saying that Sonic is too fast, and that with the world flying by at such a high speed, you don’t see anything or need to have any skill--“It’s just running!” you most likely just yelled at your monitor. It’s alright. Legions of Sonic fans are wiping nerdrage spittle off their monitor too. They’re screaming Mario is boring, slow and floaty--like riding a tricycle when you could be on a motorcycle. They’re saying that the mustachioed plumber doesn’t have any swagger. Now they’re screaming about a need for speed, and how Mario’s stately pace and emphasis on precision doesn’t fulfill it. Did someone just scream that Sonic’s a rodent? This is getting ugly. Let’s move on.

We have to imagine that by now, your blood is boiling. Before you plunge into the comments section, maybe go for a walk. Have some green tea. Punch an inanimate, non-essential object. Feel better? Good. You were looking pretty angry there.

It’s unlikely that these arguments are ever going to be resolved, but you’re welcome to try. Head into the comments section and let us know how much you freakin’ hate Final Fantasy, how Nintendo makes the only good games, that PC gaming is for nerds, and exactly how you’ve come to the conclusion that Sonic is the spawn of Satan. And if there are any debates we missed, feel free to kindle them yourselves! Do try and be polite, though.

And if you're looking for more, check out the best brotherly rivalries and what would happen in Mario died? which, truth be told, has little to do with this, but if you're a Sonic fan you'll want to read it anyway.