Google+

Supreme Commander 2 review

Excellent
AT A GLANCE
  • Badass experimental units
  • Much more newbie friendly
  • Emphasizes strategy over clicking
  • Battles are scaled down
  • Skirmish AI is limp
  • Multiplayer seems to have uncounterable strategies

The best tactic we’ve come up with is the Cybrannosaurus Bubblebath. A hovering triangle wafts into your base and drops a dinosaur on you. The dinosaur is large, about the size of a dinosaur, and has a robotic head that breathes fire. A moment later, 25 translucent spheres pop up around it. The shields these Adaptors generate aren’t impenetrable, but they overlap and regenerate. They cling to the dinosaur as missiles spill from his back like he’s moulting. He stomps toward your commander as if to eat him, but of course he won’t. He’s an herbivore; that would be ridiculous.

Supreme Commander is like the fever dream of a Robot Wars contestant: you control hundreds of killing machines as they clash with hundreds more over land, air and sea. In the first game that got complicated, and if you weren’t an actual Robot Wars contestant you could be forgiven for giving up. The slightest error in establishing your economy could cause it to crash, leaving you crippled while your opponent’s forces spread like a metal virus. If that was you: good news, come in. You’re going to love this.

If that wasn’t you, if you spent your Sundays in eight-hour matches battling seven other commanders for control of a battlefield the size of the Isle of Wight, it’s best not to think of this as a sequel. It’s more like a side-project, as if Giant Robots and Vast Armies left the group to form their own band without Epic Battlefields and Advanced Economics – who was always kind of a square. We don’t know whether the old band will ever get back together, but don’t go into this expecting the nerdy glory of those four in concert. You could easily miss why Supreme Commander 2 is great.

There is a counter to the Cybrannosaurus Bubblebath, we’ve discovered. It’s called the ‘Screw you, I have a Magnetron.’ You drop your dino, the shields go up, and said shields suddenly jerk across the base and are minced in a maw of spinning metal teeth. Rex, wagging his flame-gouting head from side to side to try to see what’s happening, is dragged slowly backwards into the sparky deathcogs by a megaelectromagnet, where they chew through his flesh and metal with indifference. A Magnetron would eat your commander. A Magnetron would eat God if He had any metal on Him.

This is what’s great about SupCom 2: very different units, eating each other. In SupCom 1, if we got a Tech 3 factory up before you, we could produce a unit to deal with anything you threw at us. In SupCom 2, if you come at us with nanoshielded gunships and we’ve spent all our Research Points unlocking the Fatboy experimental mega-tank, we’re boned. Your decision about what to spend resources on is now more important than how efficiently you produce them.

Rather than hiding these options away in icons that only pop up once you’ve built a certain factory, everything you can construct and upgrade is laid out on a Research screen. Land units, air units, naval units, your structures and your commander each have a separate tech-tree of upgrades and unlockable units, including huge Experimentals.

The Research Points you spend on this stuff accumulate over time – faster when you kill things, and faster still once you’ve built some labs. Because they’re scarce early on, your strategy almost always revolves around the shortest possible route to unlocking something major.

By the time you’ve got it, of course, Research Points are coming thick and fast, so good strategies tend to have a phase two. That’s how the Cybrannosaurus Bubblebath came about: the dino takes a long time to earn and is very slow. By the time we’ve built him, we’re earning Research Points fast enough to quickly unlock the Experimental Air Transport and give him a ride to the enemy base.

Another strategy we like is Fire a Nuclear Warhead at Them, Killing Them. It doesn’t always work. If the enemy knows what you’re up to, they can build counter-nukes to intercept. That’s why you should back it up with the Illuminate Space Temple: it lets you teleport a strike force inside your enemy’s shields, destroy their nuclear defence silo, and teleport back just in time to see your warhead launch. Be careful not to play in the same room as someone you’re going to do this to, though, as it could easily trigger a counter-attack of Being Punched in the Face.

So the biggest change in SupCom 2 is a positive one: a clear and fun tech system that gets you coming up with two-phase plans and counter-strategies involving robots, magnets, nukes and bubblebath.

It also scores points for running faster than its predecessor: we get 40fps when zoomed-in during a six-player match of the first game, 80 when zoomed out. In the same sized conflict, SupCom 2 glides along at 90fps zoomed in, 70 zoomed out.

The rest of the changes are bad, but not disastrous. The worst is that the AI this time is just limp. It puts up a decent fight in the campaign, where missions stack the odds hugely in its favour, but in Skirmish it can’t match even an average player like us. We could only take on the smartest AIs in SupCom by making them fight each other: here, we can reliably beat a team of four. The only tougher setting is Cheating, which nukes you in a few minutes. We’re not looking to get obliterated; we’d just like an AI that can navigate the tech tree well enough to build an Experimental when we do. Currently, the only way to see a clash of the titans is to make a cup of tea after building yours.

It’s also smaller game. There’s only one eight-player map here, and it’s a drab, shrunk rehash of one from the first game: Seton’s Clutch. It’s still great, but that makes it all the more maddening: there should be dozens like this, and bigger still, because the tech system works even better for large-scale war. It’s only on a huge battleground that strategies of position, timing and logistics come into play: SupCom 1 was a deliberate demonstration of that.

Despite the AI and map size, Skirmish is still the best way to play. The other two modes, Multiplayer and Campaign, each have their own trouble with the new Research Trees. In multiplayer, some strategies just seem uncounterable. Most of your time-investment in a strategy – spending Research Points – happens in secret.

So by the time we see you start to build a nuke silo, it’s too late for us to earn enough Research Points to unlock nuke defence before you obliterate us. Similarly, if we research a Cybran Soul Ripper gunship, by the time you see us building one it’s too late to get up enough anti-air to destroy it.

The campaign is surprisingly worthwhile. You have to play as each of the three factions in turn, but the UEF commander you start as is an unusually likeable chap. When an early villain laughs, “You really think those Fatboys will stop me?” Maddox says exactly what we would have: “Honestly? Yeah.”

There are still way too many missions where your objective is "Defend this shitty base I shittily made for you against an unknown number of unknown enemies from an unknown direction until - too late! they got past the turrets I pointlessly placed miles from the base by coming from an angle I forgot to say they might come from."

The bigger problem is that each faction’s tech-trees are restricted until the final mission, so you get one chance per race to try all of the most interesting stuff in the game. SupCom 2 is all about the tech trees: locking bits of them off reduces the campaign to a 12-hour tutorial.

So SupCom 2 is a great game struggling to find the right format. Skirmish is as close as it gets: it’s enormous fun despite the toothless AI, particularly if you play with a friend and stack the bots against you. We play every lunchtime now, and talk constantly about what strategy we’re going to try next.

What makes it so infectious is partly the diverse and ridiculous units, partly the way their specialised weaponry tesselates, and partly the system for unlocking them. It keeps you thinking about the roads not taken, the pairings not combined, and the hyperdeathbots unbuilt.

Mar 2, 2010

More Info

Release date: Mar 02 2010 - PC (US)
Available Platforms: PC, Xbox 360
Genre: Strategy
Published by: Square Enix
Developed by: Gas Powered Games
ESRB Rating:
Everyone 10+
PEGI Rating:
Rating Pending

We Recommend By ZergNet

8 comments

  • Jospan - September 3, 2010 11:09 p.m.

    I had bought Dawn of War Soulstorm a few years back and was blown away with it. Just last week I took a look at the demo disk that had been included. On that disk was SupCom FA, I was blown away!!! Finally a RTS that actually required strategy to play efectivly. I loved the fact that air units had a fuel limit and didn't just hover around, it really added a sense of realism to the game. (Sorry to dissapoint but real things don't just float.) Second the economic emphasis was amazing, and added another level of strategy. It made it of prime importance that you target economic structures to soften up your enemy and bring down things like shields, radar, sonar, ect... Two days ago I bought SupCom2... This game is a flop! Completly dumbed down. I can not say enough to say how this game has become just another rts, so I won't. I can only say that if you want "just another rts" get it and continue doing the same lame stuff that you always have (rushing and other noobish things) or get SupCom1 or SupCom FA and be mind boggled by it's intricacies and various lovely bits. And to the developers, Be ashamed! and I see now why this game is a flop, you let SquarEnix ruin it just like FF 13
  • HateCrapWare - March 9, 2010 10:54 p.m.

    To bad the review doesn't mention the fact that the game doesn't allow you to save when playing skirmish. Not sure if that's a bug or intentional, either way it sucks
  • drizztmainsword - March 6, 2010 8:05 p.m.

    This game should shame the developers. There feel of this game is nothing like the first one. The scale? Smaller. The number of available units? Smaller. The number of units in a given game? Smaller. The resource system? Completely lackluster and derivative. The pacing? Exceptionally fast. It feels like Starcraft, it looks like a candy shop, and the "maps" are effectively a web of hallways. What I wanted from the sequel to my favorite RTS of all times was a game that could handle upwards of 4000 units in the game at once without choking on itself. I wanted a game that took the epic scale of the first and said "let's do that again, but BIGGER." I'll be sticking to Supreme Commander 1 thank you very much. Please go and make a true sequel without dumbing it down for the console crowd.
  • psycros - March 4, 2010 1:44 p.m.

    Sigh..."Supreme Disappointment" would've been a better title, judging by this review. So they basically turned it into a cross between Warzone 2100 and Beast Wars. Nice going, Chris - what you got planned next, Demigod II: Electric Boogaloo? Oh well, back to TA for another decade..
  • may.be.vital - March 3, 2010 4:44 a.m.

    Loved the first =D we shall see on this one...
  • KevIrl92 - March 2, 2010 6:29 p.m.

    I loved the first game and still play it to this day, but when i read some of the previews and played the demo for myself i knew i was not going to be getting this game. HeavyTank's points are valid and i agree with him completely because it feels nothing like the original game. I like the resources in vs. resources out economy system of the first game. It was one of the main reasons i still play the first over other rts's i own like AOE. The game has been made the same as soooo many other RTS games and with the economy system gone it only has one of the two things left(the experimentals) that made it,IMO, stand out against the rest. (Phew first ever comment on the site and it was a wall of text. Lol)
  • Dirt5o8 - March 2, 2010 1:41 p.m.

    Ooooooh, I love rumors!
  • HeavyTank - March 2, 2010 12:05 p.m.

    Meh, the demo really wierded me out, why did they change all that stuff?The original was awesome, although yes, it was hard and yes, some units and structures were too expensive and took too much time to build. Still, they could've come up with something better than a dumbed-down game with units that look like goddamn plastic toys.. BTW, I'm still going to get it :P

Showing 1-8 of 8 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.