Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II super review

  • Dazzling visuals
  • Much improved controls
  • Skydiving combat!
  • Only get to visit a few places
  • Overall campaign is short
  • Doesn't innovate or add a lot of new stuff

Star Wars: The Force Unleashed apparently sold seven million units. If you’re reading this review it’s likely you’re one of those seven million, and it’s also likely you had some gripes with that game, even though it was often fun, imaginative, and told a solid story. We’ll talk about the initial setup for The Force Unleashed II’s plot which addresses the ending of the first game, but beyond that there will be no spoilers. We’re going to do a detailed breakdown of all the small ways TFU II improves upon the original – we did a sort of side-by-side comparison, playing both games all the way through one after the other.

Above: What's better than a lightsaber? TWO!

If it’s been a while since you played TFU, the improvements in the sequel may not be obvious as they are mostly subtle, but know that nearly across the board, the developers clearly took player feedback into account and tried to improve everything that didn’t quite work the first time around. First, let’s talk about what’s going on when the game begins – if you haven’t yet finished the first game, we’re going to spoil the ending so skip ahead to the next section.

Who are we playing as?

At the end of the first game, Darth Vader’s secret apprentice, Starkiller, has a choice to make: get revenge on Vader and kill him (but get killed by the Emperor), or save Rahm Kota… and also get killed. The second choice, the Light Side choice, is the canon ending, meaning it’s the one TFU II uses as a launching point and which counts as true in the overall Star Wars universe. So how can we be playing Starkiller if he died in the first game?

TFU II opens with Starkiller imprisoned on Kamino, the stormy ocean planet seen in the movie Attack of the Clones, where all the clone troopers came from. Getting an idea of where this is going? Vader arrives and tells Starkiller that he’s a clone, and in fact the latest in numerous attempts to clone the secret apprentice – he’s the only one to survive more than a few days. Starkiller promptly decides, “To hell with being this asshole’s slave” and leaps out the window.

What follows is incredible, and a showcase for how TFU II is not only going for more exciting moments than the original, but also not turning those moments into exasperating tedium (pulling down the Star Destroyer). Remember the scene in TFU when Starkiller plummeted through the atmosphere and force-pushed debris out of his way? Remember thinking, “Man, why can’t I play this part?” Well now you can.

Above: Not a cutscene

In fact, TFU II contains more than one skydiving sequence and each one is just plain awesome. The key here, unlike what they did with the Star Destroyer pulling scene in the first game, is that these sequences aren’t difficult or unintuitive. The game tells you that you can Force Push obstructions out of your way as you fall. Great, but what happens if we want to use Force Lighting? Oh, wait, we can do that too. Did we just blow up a tie fighter with lighting, in mid air, as we were plunging past it? Sweeeeet.

The look

Watching the cutscenes in TFU II might inspire the reaction of “Hey, these faces look really good.” Try going back to the first game, though, and the massive improvement becomes clear. The character models in TFU actually look awful – the faces are blurry, the lips move in really weird ways when the people talk, and for some reason they all look like they have cataracts. It’s like a Star Wars universe populated by zombie versions of themselves, or maybe old people with great plastic surgery. In TFU II they don’t have those bizarre watery eyes and although Starkiller’s mouth looks weird when he talks, we think that’s just because he has a weird mouth. Otherwise, everything looks great during cutscenes, and in most games this wouldn’t be important, but this now-franchise is built upon its storytelling strengths, so with better looking people and more realistic expressions, the story comes that much more alive.

Strangely, the much-touted DMM tech, which allowed wood and glass to splinter realistically in TFU, is essentially absent in TFU II. We honestly didn’t miss it much, but going back to the original and seeing objects shatter into jagged pieces looks extra cool by comparison. TFU II claims to still use DMM, but hell if we could tell. Still, the game looks fantastic, and has a more solid look to it, feeling more finalized and certainly less buggy than the original.

For instance, the rain on Kamino, rippling down every surface, is engrossing just to stop and watch for a few seconds:

Above: Wait a minute... is that stormtrooper trying to do a running headbutt?

Another particularly beautiful and imaginative aesthetic is the design of the cities on Cato Neimoidia, which are constructed as upside-down buildings hanging from the underside of gigantic arches:

Above: Hey, that's cool, we didn't notice the natural stone arches before. A hint that the Neimoidians built their cities through inspiration from the environment? Cool...

We should note, however, that the variety of locales is actually diminished from TFU. Both games recycle some locations, but in TFU II it feels more for the purpose of story rather than a cheap way to reuse resources. The actual architecture of the levels, like the first game, is rather uninteresting – it all looks pretty, but the shapes of the spaces mostly boils down to rooms connected by catwalks and hallways. They are lovely looking catwalks and hallways though.

More Info

Release date: Oct 26 2010 - PS3 (US)
Available Platforms: Xbox 360, PS3, PC
Genre: Action
ESRB Rating:
Teen: Violence
PEGI Rating:
Rating Pending


  • Shinn - December 24, 2010 9:39 a.m.

    I just finished the game, and I have to say good on you Matthew Keast. This game is completely deserving of its 8/10 rating. People these days are so spoiled by spectacular games that they can't appreciate a great game.
  • Shinn - December 19, 2010 8:48 a.m.

    I know i'm a little late to the party, but it really amuses me when peopl like Joshin from the second comment complain about the universe without actually knowing it. The type of powers the Sith can use depends on their affinity with the force. One may not be adept at using the dark side to cast lightening, but they may be able to carry out complex Sith sorcery. Vader can't cast lightening because that's not one of his strengths. Read the Bane novels.
  • sverre-sand - April 28, 2014 7:07 p.m.

    Wait... was it it not beacause most of his body is cybernetics which would mean that if he uses force lighting anyhow it would backfire?
  • conjabro - December 11, 2010 5:43 a.m.

    Osh i was just lookn at starwars the force unleashed 1 and theres a 2?? hahah epik cant wait to play it i bet its a 10/10.
  • metalgatesolid - November 1, 2010 9:54 p.m.

    How about a star wars game where your a baddie plain and simple?? The star Wars universe has always had better villians than goodies.
  • Embolado - November 1, 2010 5:08 p.m.

    If Vadars hands are the reason he can not do lightning then why does he use them when he does the force choke?
  • yonderTheGreat - October 28, 2010 10:24 p.m.

    "I'm very disappointed with Mr Lucas for how in recent years he has allowed the Story and the universe to be twisted and in places torn for financial gain but then i guess i should not be surprised." Sorry man but... Star Wars has *always* been about financial gain. Don't get me wrong... I'm not saying you're one of the people who had a problem with all the merchandising of Ep1 thru Ep3... but I think you ARE looking at the past thru unclear glasses ;) Looking fwd to the game. I'll rent it first and play the heck out of it for a day or two and then probably buy it for 20 bucks a few months later.
  • sharonbender - October 28, 2010 3:51 a.m.

    my husband plays xbox, it would be nice if you could intergrate knight of the old republic with the moves from this game, this game is great but too short i brought it yesturday and have already beat it. thank you for makeing such an adictting game
  • APIce - October 28, 2010 1:08 a.m.

    Don't know why some of these sites are badmouthing this game, some even saying the first one was better?? Wtf??!! Sure, the combat system isn't very deep--especially compared to games like Bayonetta, Devil May Cry, or even God of War (which both FU games obviously take a cue from with their QTE finishing moves)--but I still enjoyed it very much. I mean come on, throwing enemies off bridges or into objects NEVER gets old! Those other sites also complain about the length of the game, but let's be honest here, your typical single player action/adventure game these days can be plowed through in a day or two even if you're a somewhat inexperienced gamer--mainly due to the fact that developers invest so much of of their time on the online/multiplayer aspects that the single player experience suffers. But I digress, the score that this site has given is dead on....not the 6's that I have been seeing. Thank you GamesRadar, and shame on you other sites that aren't giving this game it's due!
  • Darth Slayer - October 27, 2010 4:55 p.m.

    @ Joshin69 Actually the reason Vader can not wield Force Lightning is because he has no flesh from the elbows down on his arms. Force Lightning needs to be shot out of the fingertips to work. This was actually explained briefly in the novelization of Episode III. It has nothing to do with depth in the dark side. Just on whether you have a prosthetic limb or natural limb.
  • TruckThunders - October 27, 2010 1:30 p.m.

    Interesting review. Seems a little more favorable than others reviews I've read, but I know not everyone will think about one game the same way. I know the games looks great and allows a lot of creativity with the force powers, but I have such a strong affection for the Jedi Knight games that I find this series to be too over-the-top. I know that's what it's trying to do, but personally I still prefer the older games. Good review though. I just wanted to leave a comment (because you guys always say "Please leave comments" on the podcast.
  • AquaPimp82 - October 27, 2010 11:57 a.m.

    @Joshin69 Vader can't use force lightning because he lost both of his hands/arms. It's something about not being able to channel the lightning through a robotic prosthetic.
  • The_Tingler - October 27, 2010 2:06 a.m.

    This review contradicts a lot of other reviews I've read, especially regarding the quality of the storytelling. Hmm.
  • KaiokenKid - October 27, 2010 12:16 a.m.

    Hate to ask the same ol question everytime, but did they do a better job on the PS3 version of this game then they did the first one? I know they went out and said they messed up the port on PS3 for the first game.
  • Darth_Griffin - October 27, 2010 12:06 a.m.

    I played it, and while I love it itself, the story length is too short :(
  • snoopy28358 - October 26, 2010 11:56 p.m.

    Joshin69: The reason Darth Vader cannot use force lightning is simple. He doesn't have any hands. Both his arms are mechanical and cannot produce the lightning without causing damage to himself.
  • BishopofHippo93 - October 26, 2010 10:39 p.m.

    This is the best review of the game I've seen thus far. Both Gametrailers and Gameinformer gave it very poor reviews, which makes me wonder, because I generally trust the opinions of the good folks at Gamesradar.
  • Crabhand - October 26, 2010 10:01 p.m.

    Looking on Metacritic, this is currently the highest review rating. Kinda weird considering Games Radar tends to rate in the mid-lower range compared to other sites/zines (with obvious exception being Jim Sterling).
  • Yeager1122 - October 26, 2010 9:13 p.m.

    Probably going to pick this up when the price drops especially if its short.
  • Doctalen - October 26, 2010 9:11 p.m.

    BATTLEFRONT 3 PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Showing 1-20 of 39 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000