Google+

Available on: Xbox 360, PS3, PS4, PC

Diablo III review

Ten years later the Diablo formula still works, though some of the changes are more beneficial than others

Words: on May 21, 2012
Back to Article

52 comments

  • Thedigitalg - May 22, 2012 1:53 p.m.

    To each their own, I guess. Diablo II is the reason I failed college, and Diablo III is equally incredible. I also have low standards with story, inherited from my unrivalled love for action films.
  • Higgins - May 22, 2012 1:07 p.m.

    I'm really enjoying the game so fare, but yaeh, the single-player lag is stupidity incarnate.
  • InFeRnOg - May 22, 2012 12:05 p.m.

    Anyone contemplating Diablo III, just go buy Titan Quest and its expansion for $10. Then, get Grim Dawn next year.
  • TanookiMan - May 22, 2012 9:16 a.m.

    Really good review. Also, I'm a huge fan of your style Hollander..."The gameplay – that’s the 'clicking on stuff until it dies, then leveling' part" made me choke on my coffee.
  • MetroidPrimeRib - May 22, 2012 8:06 a.m.

    Prime example of how if you wait 10+ years for a game it'll probably be disappointing
  • patbateman17 - May 22, 2012 11:13 a.m.

    Totally untrue, just look at Duke Nukem Forever...
  • Person5 - May 22, 2012 4:36 p.m.

    which was disappointing...
  • KuramaBingyi - May 22, 2012 7:04 p.m.

    DNF is a bad example. Uh...Look at...Starcraft...Two?
  • MetroidPrimeRib - May 22, 2012 10:03 p.m.

    StarCraft II is probably the only game I can think of that actually was NOT disappointing with that long of a dev time. I mean sure it wasn't as good as Brood War but not many games are.
  • patbateman17 - May 23, 2012 6:08 a.m.

    Or the Syndicate reboot! Wait...
  • tuomotaivainen - May 23, 2012 5:02 p.m.

    You're assuming that Diablo 3 was in development for all of those 10 years. Same goes for Starcraft 2. DNF is the only REAL example cause we actually KNOW that it was in development for that long. Assuming that just because there's a 10 year gap between sequels means it's been in development for that long is both naive and wrong. That said, Diablo 3 does have it's flaws, I'll agree with that. It's still a good game though ;)
  • noneedlesjustshots - May 22, 2012 7:07 a.m.

    I was interested in this game until it came out and I discovered that it had DRM. I refuse to be playing a single player game that I (in this hypothetical situation) PAY $63 FOR, and then boot up a single player game to find NOTHING. Dear god, what if Call of Duty pulled this crap? There would be blood running through the streets!
  • Zeedar - May 22, 2012 12:43 a.m.

    I may get this, when the price drops. It is still a decent game, but it wont have the impact of Diablo 2. Also the DRM on this game is unacceptable. I'll definitely get Torchlight 2 first. Cheaper, no god forsaken DRM and there is LAN play. It's what the paying costumers deserve.
  • Person5 - May 22, 2012 3:17 a.m.

    The price will never drop, or it will drop in somewhere along the lines of five years from now. Blizz believes they can charge 60 for this game then why bother making it less. I do agree with you on Torchlight though, the actual Diablo III
  • bamb0o-stick - May 22, 2012 7:18 a.m.

    Hah, if you think about it, if you're going to spend $60 you might as well buy 3 copies of Torchlight and gift the other two to play together.
  • bamb0o-stick - May 22, 2012 7:23 a.m.

    Actually my mistake. Torchlight is being sold for FOUR copies for $60 on steam. What a steal.
  • Person5 - May 22, 2012 1:46 p.m.

    so if none of your friends get it just gift it to them so you have four out of eight people in your coop game, interesting fact, you can only have four people in a Diablo game, hm, the more you know.
  • Zyrusticae - May 21, 2012 9:44 p.m.

    I gotta say, the story/writing is definitely my biggest beef with the game. It seems like, somewhere around the release of World of Warcraft, Blizzard just lost all their ability to tell good stories - or at least, tell them in a manner that actually shows some level of restraint. I mean, compare Diablo 3 or Starcraft 2 to the originals - hell, even Warcraft 3 had better writing, as I could actually take the fall of Arthas seriously! There's just no build-up in Diablo 3; it's just a rapid-fire machinegun of events that hold no meaning to the player as there is absolutely no time given for the implications to percolate properly, not to mention they have a serious inability to withhold themselves from just dumping in more and more and more dialogue into the game. The demons do NOT need to be talking to the PC more than twice a damn game! They lose all their mystique that way! Hell, in Diablo and Diablo 2, Diablo himself never uttered more than two lines throughout the entire game, and that made the fucker MENACING. You had no idea what he was capable of, no idea what his plans were, all you knew was that he was badass, he was evil, and he needed to be fucked up quick or he'd fuck YOU. So in a nutshell: Poor dialogue, too much of that dialogue, no restraint, treating big bad demon lords like cliche cartoon villains, and not enough grimdark all contribute to the game's lousy, terrible, awful storytelling. It's a damn shame, too, because the rest of the game is pure excellence. (Minus the graphics, but I can live with that.) I guess I really shouldn't expect decent storytelling from Blizzard anymore. They just... whoever's at the helm, just doesn't know how to do it.
  • bamb0o-stick - May 22, 2012 7:21 a.m.

    I agreed with you with how scary and menacing Diablo was in the first two game. Heck, when I watched the cinematics in Diablo 2 I was at the edge of my seat engrossed with the great voice acting of the narrator. Now you have 'demon diaries' to pick up, a joke on the letters you pick up in-game where they are talking to someone about something. I just roll my eyes and say "really?"
  • Rubberducky - May 21, 2012 9:02 p.m.

    Definitely not feeling it this time around. Just doesnt seem to have the same thing as D2 had for me. Its entertaining in small doses but I haven't had the urge to play for hours on end. Think I'd give it a 7 myself, wish I had waited for a price drop now :/

Showing 1-20 of 52 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

Great
YOU'LL LOVE
  • The upgraded visuals and overall presentation
  • Addictive, rewarding combat
  • Finding an awesome item off the corpse of a tough enemy
YOU'LL HATE
  • Realizing that same item sells for a paltry 300 gold on the Auction House
  • Pedestrian writing and a nonsensical, cliché story
  • Getting hit with crippling lag… while playing alone

More Info

Release date: US
Sep 03 2013 (Xbox 360, PS3)
May 15 2012 (PC)
Expected release date: UK
2011 (PC)
Available Platforms: Xbox 360, PS3, PS4, PC
Genre: Role Playing
Published by: Blizzard
Developed by: Blizzard
Franchise: Diablo
ESRB Rating:
Mature
RSS
Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.