Google+

Carmack defends Call of Duty, calls out “snooty” devs and critics

Doom creator derides industry elitism, says there’s nothing wrong with making popular games

Doom creator John Carmack wasn't trying to create an indie work of art when he threw Aliens, Wolfenstein 3D and Hieronymus Bosch into a bag and shook it up until Doom fell out. The game was groundbreaking in plenty of ways, but it also made its populist, ass-kicking intentions clear. Speaking in an interview with Industry Gamers, Carmack said he’s happy that id Software’s Rage is “a little bit different in terms of feeling and tone.” However, although Rage may have a lot more in common with other modern first-person shooters, the co-founder of id Software has little time for people who rag on games, like Modern Warfare just because there are uncomplicated and popular.

Speaking about the perceived creative slump within the FPS genre (you know the complaints: gray palettes, squad gameplay, pistol/shotgun/machinegun weapon-sets, etc), Carmack bristles. “As long as people are buying it, it means they’re enjoying it," he argues. "If they buy the next Call of Duty, it’s because they loved the last one and they want more of it. So I am pretty down on people who take the sort of creative auteurs' perspective.”

The designer’s first priority, he suggests, shouldn't be creativity but value. His job, Carmack argues, is “not to do something that nobody’s ever seen before. It’s to do something that people love so much they’re willing to give us money for." Carmack has little time for what he calls the “snooty attitude” of many regarding creativity: “It’s almost as if it’s popular, it’s not good. And that’s just not true.”


Above: If this is creative bankruptcy, it's hard to make a case for innovation

It’s the same argument often made by filmmakers or musicians when they turn out something that happens to be both well-received by critics and popular with the masses. Of course, you could argue that when people criticize shooters for being popular, they're really lamenting an industry that's less likely to take a chance on something that's a little harder to sell... but then, there was once a time when “shooting demonic zombies in semi-3D first-person” would've been a hard sell too. And that turned out okay, right?

Jul 19, 2011

Related

Platforms:

Xbox 360, PS3, PC

30 comments

  • hester2 - July 20, 2011 2:01 a.m.

    Complaining that shooters are all that's out there is OK. Blaming shooters themselves, however, is not. Most of the high-profile ones are great games, and they should be recognized as such. I don't really buy the "it's all shooters" argument anyways. Look at this year: Catherine, Assassin's Creed, Arkham Asylum, L.A. Noire, TWO Zeldas, Mass Effect 3 (OK, semi-shooter there), The Witcher 2, Forza 4, etc. All of these either were or are destined to be great games. Big shooters, on the other hand, consist of Resistance, COD, Battlefield, Rage, and Uncharted. Dead Island is somewhere in between. That seems pretty balanced to me.
  • TheCakeIsaPie - July 20, 2011 2:03 a.m.

    He does have a point. Naughty Dog's games aren't all that original, but they add value to whatever was already there. Still, Okami.
  • DaveGoose - July 20, 2011 2:07 a.m.

    Mass Effect 3 is 2012 not 2011 Hester! Shame on you!
  • hester2 - July 20, 2011 2:12 a.m.

    Son of a bitch! Actually, I guess that's a good thing. My wallet is already going to be annihilated. Wow. I forgot Skyrim. I am self-revoking my Internet privileges.
  • EnragedTortoise1 - July 20, 2011 2:24 a.m.

    You also said Arkham Asylum instead of City. :>
  • hester2 - July 20, 2011 2:28 a.m.

    Damn this beer!
  • Redeater - July 20, 2011 2:40 a.m.

    @hester2 Yeah the problem with that is that almost anything original dies a horrible death upon release. Enslaved, Child of Eden, Shadows of the Damned, Madworld, Vanquish, Mirrors Edge the list is endless. Saying that there is nothing but shooters may not be true but saying that companies take less and less chanches on anyting that is not FPS is.
  • hester2 - July 20, 2011 2:45 a.m.

    That's a budget/consumer problem, not an industry problem. The thing is, those of us who take the time to comment on sites all agree that these are great games. We are a minority, though. It's the more casual consumers who decide what keeps going. Besides, the fact that the list is endless means that we keep getting original games. Do you really want all of those to become franchises? Then people would just list them as examples of how the industry doesn't innovate.
  • D0CCON - July 20, 2011 2:45 a.m.

    I used to love COD even when it was popular (MW2 was popular, right?) and I still love Mass Effect, Battlefield, Halo, Elder Scrolls, Uncharted, Portal, Half Life, and more even though they are also popular, so I don't think popularity is why I'm sick of it. The poster on this site showing a box of Even More Call of Duty with the slogan familiarity breeds contempt is actually the reason I'm sick of it.
  • PimplesInYourAsstista - July 20, 2011 2:53 a.m.

    Sounds like a fancy way of saying "If its popular, then is automatically better then everything else."
  • Redeater - July 20, 2011 2:58 a.m.

    @hester2 No it's the fact that they are not in the business to make you happy. They are in fact a business and have shareholders to answer to. Do you think they are going to develop games that constantly bomb just to keep a small niche of gamers happy? The truth is that as games become more and more costly to create the chances are going to be less and less that a company is going to shell out money on original IPs. I'm still waiting for Beyond Good and Evil 2....
  • Redeater - July 20, 2011 3:12 a.m.

    Ugh sorry to post again but this really bothers me. "It’s almost as if it’s popular, it’s not good. And that’s just not true.” If this was even remotely true how is it that you never hear anyone talk shit about Valve? Hell most of the people boycotting L4D2 were playing it on release.
  • Cloud1Fair3 - July 20, 2011 3:42 a.m.

    I think it's reasonable to consider games art. For me, it's like any other art. When something becomes big and successful, most of the cash cow artists(devs) try to emulate it to cash in. I could say it easily gets tiring, unless of course they don't overdo it and focus on core things such as story, visuals and improving gameplay diversity. Like any art form, it gets stale easily when overdone and everything becomes homogonous in the mad attempt to cash in on the market created by the originals success. I can't imagine FPSs will hold the market for much longer, because it's style has reached it's entertainment limit; at the very least, in my opinion nothing new and exciting has come from FPSs since Modern Warfare and I personally enjoy Battlefield for online shooters more. That being said, I'm looking forward to titles like Catherine and even though Uncharted may be the same as COD games later down the line, the two I've played have been excellent and just jaw dropping in terms of story and gameplay. I think though, I'll eventually get tired of Unchartd as well, unfortunately. I think as long as a game has substance and doesn't overstay it's creative welcome then I'll play it. The more original and genuine the game though, the more I'll play it and the more appreciation I'll have for it. I find I"m truly getting into games for aesthetics such as the art styles and just unique story lines and memorable characters. In the end, like in all art I just want substance, something memorable that I'll look fondly back on and will never really get old because the it's essentialy and deeply a great piece of art like Shadow of the Collosus, Okami, Persona 3, Uncharted 2, Red Dead Redemption, etc. Those are the games that will go down in the history of gaming and more importantly, in my nostalgia trips. On that note, does anybody else LOVE The Legend of Dragoon? Cause I can easily say that is my favorite game of all time.
  • RuBIX - July 20, 2011 4:11 a.m.

    This guys is pretty smart. People can argue that games are art and about creativity and anything else, but at the end of the day making videogames is a business and the big developers and publishers need to make money. And if they sink millions of dollars into a game, they cannot have it fail. It could be the end of their company and their job. Shooters are a hot genre right now so even a mediocre one is still going to sell decently. Lots of developers walk a fine line between making something creative, and making something that they know will sell well. And sometimes you get something really awesome like Bioshock. Its still a shooter, but with flair and a compelling story. Just kind of interesting to think about it from the business side of things.
  • RedOutlive10 - July 20, 2011 4:19 a.m.

    He can't tear the series a new one when he's implementing Regenerative Health and what not in his own game. Developers like VALVe have all the ammo they need if they ever wanted to slam CoD and all other generic shooters.
  • Gameguy94 - July 20, 2011 4:46 a.m.

    I hate Call of Duty and refuse to buy any more of them. I'm just glad the copy of Black Ops I (regretfully) bought was used. Its just not fun. Rage is looking to be awesome.
  • GhostLightning - July 20, 2011 5:38 a.m.

    Good to see this. Fuck all the haters.
  • avantguardian - July 20, 2011 7:07 a.m.

    @ghostlightning : seconded. @hester2 & redeater: you guys are both right, really. red's right about the business aspect, but hester's right that we will ALWAYS have unique games, because more than anything, game devs are GAMERS first. there will always be room in our culture for a more artistic extension of the mainstream. there just HAS to be. the problem i see is, you have no way of telling if something is going to take off or not. call of duty didn't HAVE to be huge. the list of improbable successes is just as viable a resource as games that have bombed. assassin's creed could have bombed badly, but its pretty much gold now. resident evil, dynasty warriors(huge yet niche franchise), skate, prince of persia, MARIO etc: all huge, all could have been one game. i'd like to see a study done on the relation of advertising funds to overall sales, 'cause it seems like that has a lot to do with it(Shadows and Child are good recent examples of this). bayonetta sold over a mil in Japan before even coming stateside. vanquish has sold over a mil (at least, it was 820k at the end of '10). i've seen mirror's edge with over 2 mil w/o including the pc version. enslaved, well, enslaved bombed. i bought, beat, and loved all of these, but i also am at 15th prestige on black ops. and ncaa football is my favorite series. if you truly love games, you can love them all. sorry tl:dr
  • CitizenWolfie - July 20, 2011 9:01 a.m.

    Totally agree with him. It does piss me off these days how any article that mentions Call of Duty, no matter how tenuously, is greeted with a chorus of "Fuck CoD!" "Fuck Activision!" "Kotick sucks dick" etc. It's cool to hate on Activision, we get it. In another universe, I'd pretty much guarantee half these people would be saying the same thing about Battlefield if Activision released it and fawning over EA's Call of Duty. I like Call of Duty. I like the silly OTT single player campaign - brain on neutral, just enjoy blowing stuff up. I like how cheap-ass the multiplayer is - my friends and I can bond and have a laugh about some of the random stuff that happens. It's frustrating at the time but I wouldn't have it any other way. People take themselves way too seriously online anyway so it's nice to have them bought down a peg with some amateur with a noobtube or a rogue throwing knife. TL:DR - Not every game has to be Bioshock, Okami or Shadow of the Colossus. Lighten up and have fun.
  • raptorak - July 20, 2011 10:11 a.m.

    But let's not forget that Call of Duty sucks. I respect Carmack as much as anyone, but he's a programmer and rocket scientist, not necessarily a massive gamer or a designer. If he tells me Nvidia is better than AMD, or that Megatexture is some good shiznit, I believe that. But design? Well, I take his opinion same as anyone elses. He provides the engines that allow creativity; like Gibson make guitars for anyone who cares to use them, and if Carmack likes Britney Spears then that is his call, but she's still awful. And I'm yet to see Carmack rockin the Prius, that's popular, so you better give up that ferrari Carmack! :P

Showing 1-20 of 30 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

Connect with GamesRadar

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.