Almost 40 years later, a Terminator producer reveals why an important scene was deleted
James Cameron was not satisfied with "just ok"
Weekly digests, tales from the communities you love, and more
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Every Friday
GamesRadar+
Your weekly update on everything you could ever want to know about the games you already love, games we know you're going to love in the near future, and tales from the communities that surround them.
Every Thursday
GTA 6 O'clock
Our special GTA 6 newsletter, with breaking news, insider info, and rumor analysis from the award-winning GTA 6 O'clock experts.
Every Friday
Knowledge
From the creators of Edge: A weekly videogame industry newsletter with analysis from expert writers, guidance from professionals, and insight into what's on the horizon.
Every Thursday
The Setup
Hardware nerds unite, sign up to our free tech newsletter for a weekly digest of the hottest new tech, the latest gadgets on the test bench, and much more.
Every Wednesday
Switch 2 Spotlight
Sign up to our new Switch 2 newsletter, where we bring you the latest talking points on Nintendo's new console each week, bring you up to date on the news, and recommend what games to play.
Every Saturday
The Watchlist
Subscribe for a weekly digest of the movie and TV news that matters, direct to your inbox. From first-look trailers, interviews, reviews and explainers, we've got you covered.
Once a month
SFX
Get sneak previews, exclusive competitions and details of special events each month!
Nearly 40 years later, The Terminator producer Gale Ann Hurd has revealed why a pivotal scene – that would explain away franchise plot holes – was ultimately cut from the film.
"The Terminator financier John Daly's Hemdale had an output deal with Orion Pictures, but hadn’t yet made a hit (that changed with our film and Platoon)," Hurd explained via Twitter. "They insisted we use financier friends not actors in this scene, which ruined it for us."
Added Hurd: "[director] Jim [Cameron] (thankfully) was never satisfied with ‘just ok’, even back then!"
Though the scene is only a minute long, it's a pretty vital moment that explains how Cyberdyne Systems came to be in possession of the microchip that is ultimately placed inside the terminators. It basically reveals that the Terminator's is the father of Skynet, as Kyle Reese is the father of John Connor – parallel journeys for two opposing forces. (It also makes That Controversial Scene in Terminator: Dark Fate seem even more nonsensical).
"They were paid as actors, via the Taft-Hartley Act. I think he insisted they be in the film because the financiers were promised a return on their investment and had yet to receive one. Daly never believed the film would be a success," Hurd went on to explain. Overall, it seems that the team – namely director James Cameron – wasn't happy with how the scene turned out, and that, at the time, they figured it'd be an easy cut. I think they should do a 40th-anniversary release with the scene included – but maybe that's just me.
For more, check out our list of the most exciting upcoming movies in 2023 and beyond.
Bringing all the latest movie news, features, and reviews to your inbox

Lauren Milici is a Senior Entertainment Writer for GamesRadar+ based in New York City. She previously reported on breaking news for The Independent's Indy100 and created TV and film listicles for Ranker. Her work has been published in Fandom, Nerdist, Paste Magazine, Vulture, PopSugar, Fangoria, and more.


