Max Payne 3 – hands-on with Gang Wars, Payne Killer and multiplayer Bullet Time

Judging from what we’ve played so far, Max Payne 3 seems to do an admirable job of preserving the feel and rhythms of its more old-school predecessors. However, it’s also bringing a lot of modern tropes to the series, including sticky cover, (optional) lock-on aiming, and (perhaps most unexpected of all) multiplayer. We recently got a chance to dive into said multiplayer (headfirst and in slow motion with both guns blazing), and we found that – far from being a tacked-on set of 16-player skirmishes – Max Payne 3’s approach to online shooting is unique, deep and filled with ample opportunities for turning the tables and griefing your opponents.

Our time with MP3’s multiplayer was divided into three central modes: team deathmatch, Gang Wars and Payne Killer. Team deathmatch should be self-explanatory, while Gang Wars (described by Rockstar as MP3’s “flagship” mode) pits teams against each other in a five-round series of matches, with the goal of each match decided by the results of the last one (i.e. if one player racks up a lot of kills, the next round might be a VIP match with him as the target).

Payne Killer, meanwhile, starts out as a free-for-all, eight-player deathmatch. The first player to make a kill then turns into Max, while the first player to be killed turns into Max’s partner, Raul Passos. Max and Passos each have better abilities, special weapons (Max carries dual Uzis, while Passos wields a light machinegun) and a couple painkillers, which let them heal more quickly than multiplayer’s slowly regenerating health normally allows. And that stuff’s great, because once Max and Passos show up, it’s every other player’s job to hunt them. (Players who kill them then become them, so everyone gets a turn, assuming they’re good enough to murder one of the “heroes” at least once.)

Interestingly, there’s a stronger sense of teamwork when playing as the bad guys than as Max and Passos. Because the heroes are tougher, and because it’s easy for them to get separated (or just spawn in different places), there’s more of a lone-wolf mentality when you’re blazing through the map as one of them. As a bad guy, however, your health is minimal, and ganging up on the heroes is essential to bringing them down. (This also means you’re likely to get a hero near death only to see the kill stolen by a comrade, unfortunately.)

So that’s the basic setup, but it’s what you can do in these modes that makes them actually interesting. Bullet Time, for example, is a big draw; every player has a three-level “adrenaline” meter that’s built up by kills and looting bodies (more on that later), and so long as you’ve got at least one bar of adrenaline full, you can activate a slow-motion shootdodge at any time, making your opponents sluggish while you aim, fire and reload at a normal speed (shootdodging is also one way to break someone's lock on you, if you're playing a match where lock-aiming is allowed). To keep from slowing down the entire game (and to avoid the easy copout of just activating a Bullet Time bubble around one player), the developers had to come up with a unique solution.

“That was our first directive – first two directives: No bubbles, can’t affect everyone,” said Charlie Bewsher, lead designer of MP3’s multiplayer modes. “So we spent a long time concepting out, I don’t know, a dozen ideas. And the one we settled on was the line-of-sight one. So anyone who’s in your line of sight when you activate Bullet Time gets caught in it. It will chain, so anyone who they see will also get caught in it. So we didn't want it to be unfair, we didn’t want you to come across anyone who’s slow and you’re not, or anything like that.”

So what happens if two players with Bullet Time activated see each other? “Basically, you have an ‘activator’ concept, and an ‘affected’ concept,” Bewsher said. “So you’re both activators, you both have that benefit. And any teammates who are caught in it as well have the activator Bullet Time.”


In practice, Bullet Time works beautifully, and it turns out that shootdodging off a high platform in slow motion is a lot more fun when the guys you’re getting the drop on are other players (although that said, it’s not much fun to get caught in). It’s far from the only thing that makes Max Payne 3 unique, though. Like a lot of modern shooters, there’s a system of leveling and customization to keep players hooked, with experience awarded for kills and assists – and like with Bullet Time, the game's found some unique ways to implement it.


  • FlyinMachine - March 30, 2012 10:10 a.m.

    I'm stupidly excited for this game at this point. The gunplay looks absolutely amazing, thus far! My only concern is that it's in Brazil and that it deviates away from its New York comic book noire atmosphere that I love so much. Buuuut I still expect a lot from Rockstar! Here's to hoping it's just as good as the other two!
  • gabriel-morales - March 30, 2012 9:17 a.m.

    I see alot of once single player games now incorporate multiplayer modes. Though I believe they added this in perfectly just from the looks of it. Unlike some other recent titles...
  • birdman1041 - March 29, 2012 9:07 p.m.

    Not many comments here...Is everyone too busy arguing about the Mass Effect 3 ending to care? Rockstar has my gaming dollar over Bioware any day of the year.
  • MidianGTX - March 30, 2012 8:30 a.m.

    GTA IV made so many more mistakes than ME3 did. I can deal with a slightly disappointing ending, because finishing a game isn't that fun anyway, playing it is. GTA IV's dating system though? Fake websites? Removal of anything resembling planes, jetpacks, monster trucks and BMXs? I'm quite liking the look of Max Payne 3, but GTA V has so much more to prove before it earns any of my money.
  • gabriel-morales - March 30, 2012 9:16 a.m.

    Good for you. You made a useless point that nobody here cares about.
  • Letter11 - March 29, 2012 9:07 p.m.

    I'm really looking forward to this game but... What is it with Rockstar productions and their mandatory inclusion of lock-on? I tried played Red Dead Redemption with manual aim, and it was impossible to hit anything. The multiplayer, to me looked reminiscent of Uncharted's which has absolutely no need for lock-on and is a lot of fun. Even if it's optional the fact that it's there at all bothers me, because I imagine it will become the norm.
  • Evanesco - March 30, 2012 7:01 a.m.

    The free-aim for Red Dead was amazingly simple to use. My guess is that your experience of having a hard time with it was in large part due to you using lock-on for a mild period of time before you tried free-aim. It can really screw up your reflexive hand-eye coordination for a time until your brain re-engages it's accuracy and trajectory processes. Free-aim in Rockstar's games that use Euphoria has always been easy, and it even comes with a sticky aim, so it's not toally free. Free-aim on a horse, however, was f****** hard, and everyone knows lol.
  • Letter11 - March 30, 2012 2:41 p.m.

    I'm gonna pop Red Dead in for a bit and try it out again. You're probably right I remember switching after playing with lock-on for a while. But yeah on horseback, I imagine it will always be a bitch lol. I still don't like the fact that I imagine everyone will use lock-on in multiplayer though. But I'm really getting it for the single-player anyway.
  • DualWieldingIsNotFeasible - March 29, 2012 6:10 p.m.

    Well, my skepticism has certainly been decreased. I've been waiting a long time for a new Max Payne game, but the multiplayer seemed like a needless add-on. After reading this, I'm actually sort of interested to play this. Only time will tell if we're dealing with another BioShock 2 situation, though.

Showing 1-9 of 9 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000