GoldenEye 007 review

  • Gets the GoldenEye feel right
  • Some great set pieces and stealthy action
  • Multiplayer is a blast
  • Not all of the game is imaginative
  • Some wonky aiming issues
  • Some weird difficulty spikes

Living up to the impossibly rosy memories of fans of the contender for the N64’s best game is, well, probably impossible. Take note that this GoldenEye 007 is not an “HD” version of the original with Wii controls slapped on. It’s a retelling of the GoldenEye story, using the movie’s screenwriter to give it a proper 2010 contemporary vibe (Bond now has a smartphone) and tossing out the now embarrassingly crusty Pierce Brosnan in favor of perpetually pouty-mouthed and bat-eared Daniel Craig. Sorry, Daniel, we really do think you’re a supremely suave Bond.

Above: More suave than us, that's for sure

The story hasn’t actually changed much, but the levels are basically all-new, with the odd homage to the original game thrown in. What also hasn’t changed, and what was absolutely crucial for the new development team to nail, is the feel of GoldenEye. The game feels like you’re playing the old-school classic, even when it’s doing things entirely differently. The weapons feel right, the music sounds right, and the look hits the right notes – and yes, we’ll trot out the old reliable phrase – it looks pretty slick for a Wii game, using rain and snow and shiny lights to occasionally trick the eyes into thinking this is true current-gen.

The game also incorporates the clever difficulty system established in the original: increased difficulty doesn’t just mean tougher and more numerous enemies – it means additional objectives to complete, which lead you into areas of levels you might otherwise ignore. With four difficulty levels changing up the way the game is played, there’s opportunity for significant replay value. You can even go to the ultimate retro approach with “007 Classic” which removes regenerating health.

The one gripe we have with the difficulty system is that it’s actually not obvious how it works – and this led to a bizarre situation for us. We began the story on Agent difficulty, which is one step up from the easy mode, so that we could experience the additional objectives. At the end of the first mission, the overview screen informed us we failed our secondary objective. Uh, what? We had no idea we were ignoring it during our progression – we followed the objective marker through the level, but apparently the secondary objectives are hidden. Weird, but not a huge deal. Yet the game allowed us to save and continue to the next mission. Again, strange. And then, about halfway through the game, when we were wondering why the game seemed so easy and we still weren’t being asked to complete secondary objectives, we noticed that the difficulty was set on Operative (easy mode).

So we went back and confirmed that yes, if you fail any secondary objectives, the game will quietly let you continue, but only on super easy mode. There was, in fact, text at the bottom of the mission complete screen saying this, but we didn’t notice it – this is the kind of choice that absolutely demands an “are you sure?” popup window. We’ll admit we can be a bit obtuse sometimes, and perhaps most people won’t miss this detail, but we’re not entirely stupid and we did completely miss it. It's a strange case of having to read fine print within a game, which is something we've never really encountered before.

Above: We were wondering why we could absorb twenty bullets

Anyway, on to the gameplay: the first mission announces itself smartly, beginning with some classic Bond stealth play and then ramping things up with a scripted, exciting truck chase. Explosions, truck collisions, and guys getting smacked off car doors all happen in rapid succession. Then, the game returns to sneaky stuff. This is the general flow of the action: sneaky part, lout shoot-em-up part, and back again. It’s a good flow. The best parts of the game are on the extremes of this spectrum: the really sneaky parts, and the really action-heavy parts. The middle part of the spectrum, and the majority of the game, is a bit less interesting.

The complex, exciting set pieces like that first truck chase actually don’t happen that often. There is plenty of opportunity to be sneaky – except it often doesn’t work, and for the wrong reasons. A big aspect that staying stealthy is dependent upon is accurate headshots with your trademark silenced P99. Except they don’t work half the time. We lost count of how many times we sneaked up on a guy, lined up the head shot, and then failed to kill the guy. We actually changed our tactics to assume our headshot wouldn’t kill the guy, and instead of pulling off cool one-shot kills, we just started plugging guys five times quickly to ensure they’d stay dead. The other problem with the stealth is that enemies sometimes detect you when there’s no way they should be able to see you – and then they shoot you through the cover they shouldn’t have seen you behind.

Above: The game looks good, but most of it is like this - generic guys shooting at you in generic "high tech" facilities

More Info

Release date: Nov 02 2010 - DS, Wii (US)
Nov 05 2010 - DS, Wii (UK)
Available Platforms: DS, Wii
Genre: Shooter
Published by: Activision
Developed by: n-Space, Eurocom Studios
ESRB Rating:
Teen: Blood, Violence, Mild Suggestive Themes, Mild Language
PEGI Rating:
Matthew Keast

My new approach to play all games on Hard mode straight off the bat has proven satisfying. Sure there is some frustration, but I've decided it's the lesser of two evils when weighed against the boredom of easiness that Normal difficulty has become in the era of casual gaming.

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000
  • yagirlfriendsfavoriterapper - July 8, 2011 5:27 p.m.

    This game is a 9 for me, still pay it today single and multi.
  • Agent36496 - June 12, 2011 6:37 p.m.

    This really was a good game. I find it a classic reborn. Yeah, I hated that I died so many times and when there were too many people but that's what strategy is all about. If you hated the game, that's YOUR FUCKIN' PROBLEM! This was one remake well worth playing. So, all you haters can GO TO HELL!!!
  • fullmetalgeass - December 25, 2010 5:23 p.m.

    this game was WAY too dark! I got stuck so many times in campaign because i couldn't see where I was going and got shot down. Is there any way to adjust the brightness on my wii?
  • markshell - November 10, 2010 2:59 a.m.

    The great thing about this game is that it's like you're living a movie literally through Bond's eyes. The feel is great, even though I never liked shooters before.
  • Fhiend - November 7, 2010 4:50 a.m.

    Anyone know if it has bots offline?
  • sharker - November 6, 2010 10:06 p.m.

    Deserved at least an 8 imo. johnthe5th says it perfectly, this should be treated as a completely different game, it's not even by the same dev.
  • elpurplemonkey - November 6, 2010 2:35 a.m.

    I have to agree with you QWERTY- a 7/10 is a good score. Watching some videos of the game- it looks so much better in motion. And it's refreshing just to see a developer actually putting forth an effort with the Wii. Possible buy, great rental.
  • marioman50 - November 5, 2010 12:01 a.m.

    @db1331 Apparently Keast DOES think it's a "good" game, 7 = Good. Plus, game review sites: Joystiq, 1up, IGN, and GameTrailers all gave this game the equivalent of an 8 or higher. Tell me you're not going to totally write the game off as bad based on a single review that gave it A GOOD SCORE. I'm not defending the game either (haven't played it), but if you're going to judge a game based on the review scores of other people, at least do it right.
  • bezza - November 3, 2010 8:20 p.m.

    It's so shit
  • Dazzler25 - November 3, 2010 12:31 p.m.

    @TheCakeIsaPie I agree everything or nothing was an amazing game I'll probably pick this game up cause I loved the original but mainly cause the gold controller that's comes with it is pretty cool
  • johnthe5th - November 3, 2010 2:13 a.m.

    How is this not better than the original? People are going to give this bad reviews simply because it apparently isn't "as good" as the old one, but what they don't realize is that the original Goldeneye game is outdated, ugly, and just not fun to play anymore, but it only seems so much better because of all the crazy nostalgia people feel from it. It's the same thing with the Zelda series. Twilight Princess is obviously an overall better game than Ocarina of Time, but it doesn't have the same impact as OoT had back in the day. In my opinion, this type of reviewing is completely unfair. However, it's understandable because its impossible to simply ignore one's nostalgia, especially for such a widely beloved game like this.
  • n00b - November 3, 2010 1:09 a.m.

    now lets see what bizarre does with their bond game
  • RamenDragon - November 3, 2010 1:07 a.m.

    Seems like a shame... looks like a lot of the problems could have easily been fixed.
  • AdonisX82 - November 3, 2010 12:28 a.m.

    Am I the only person that thinks this game should've gotten nothing more than a new coat of paint and otherwise been left alone? There's a reason this game has the legacy that it has, it was amazing. The levels were great (with schematics STRAIGHT FROM the movie. That's downright impressive), the gameplay was great, with specific body hits and the objective/difficulty system. The music fit perfectly. The weapons were fantastic and fun to use (RCP-90, has ANYTHING fired faster since?), and the choice was extensive. Seriously, better graphics and physics, voice acting, a few "current" tweaks (better hit recognition, NOT regenerating health) this game could've been perfection. And what the hell was the point of making Craig Bond in this one? If you did'nt want to stay entirely true to the game, they could have at LEAST stayed true to the movie. I have'nt heard any mention of the other charecters either. I don't even have a Wii, so really, I'm just bitching. But Goldeneye was a game that was truly amazing, and I don't think this does it justice.
  • Unoriginal - November 2, 2010 11:50 p.m.

    Looks like fun.I kinda want this for the local multiplayer, not enough games do 4-player split screen anymore. Review read like an 8 to me but that is just me.
  • QWERTYCommander - November 2, 2010 11:45 p.m.

    @db1331 You are so negative. You always bitch about something in almost every one of your comments. Also, last time I checked, a 7 was a good score.
  • Felixthecat - November 2, 2010 11:36 p.m.

    I won't be getting this, because 1) I don't have money to spare and 2) I have the original along with my N64 sitting right next to me.
  • JADENkOTOR - November 2, 2010 11:30 p.m.

    Goldeneye overrated? Jesus... Anyway this looks like a good tribute to the original and from reading the review it sounds like it deserves more than a 7 (especially for a wii game), but I can't really know till I play it. I do wish a serious dev could get there hands on this franchise because there in so much potential with the Bond series (BioWare making a Bond RPG? I think I would die.). Also good review, I think you hit all of the major points.
  • festerblatz82 - November 2, 2010 10:44 p.m.

    The original Goldeneye is one of the most overrated games ever. Having already been playing multiplayer PC shooters for awhile when it came out might have skewed my viewpoint.
  • Darkhawk - November 2, 2010 10:34 p.m.

    Does it have a facility, and does it have a dude in the stall? Not, sitting, mind you, but just standing there waiting to get that wonderful level-beginning head shot.