Duke Nukem Forever review

  • Gunning down aliens is still fun
  • Shrinking, driving are neat changes of pace
  • Improves noticeably toward the end of the game
  • Visual glitches, blurry textures are common
  • Infuriatingly long loads between levels, deaths
  • Action punctuated with lots of dull stretches

The impossible has happened: After 14 years in development hell, Duke Nukem Forever is a reality. Long synonymous with endless delays and empty promises, this butt of countless internet jokes is finally, undeniably here. Whether that’s a good thing is another matter entirely.

Picking up 12 years after the events of 1996’s Duke Nukem 3D, the long-overdue sequel forces foul-mouthed cardboard-cutout Duke out of retirement to fight off another alien invasion. Or maybe it’s just the second half of the same alien invasion, seeing as how the aggressors are updated versions of the familiar Pigcops, assault troopers and Battlelords that menaced players in DN3D, now here to kidnap Earth’s women and make Duke look like a chump.

Of course, it’s all just a flimsy backdrop for silly, gruesome alien carnage and crude gags – or at least, it should have been. DNF starts off promisingly enough, with a current-gen re-creation of the final boss battle from DN3D, but quickly goes downhill when it’s revealed to be a game Duke is playing. Now retired and living in a 69-floor (hurr) Vegas casino/monument to his own ego, Duke has to travel downstairs and try to appear on a talk show before the alien invasion happens, at which point you have to run to his secret “Duke Cave” to initiate a lengthy conversation and a turret-shooting sequence. All of this, incidentally, will take around 20-30 minutes to play through, and it’s peppered with dated pop-culture gags and annoying NPCs.

Above: Ha ha, remember when Christian Bale yelled at that guy? Like two years ago? 

So, OK, that’s just the intro. Lots of games take a while to get off the ground, and given DNF’s surprisingly long run time – anywhere from 12-16 hours, depending on how good you are at staying alive – it’s a pretty small chunk of the game. But it’s also an introduction for some irritations that stick with the game throughout, like textures that are either slow to pop in or just plain blurry; inexplicable visual stuttering; women who are uniformly depicted as squealing airheads; and occasional stabs at lame jokes.

Oh, and the load times. Easily the worst thing about Duke Nukem Forever, the loading screens that pop up after every death or transition to a new level tend to take 30 seconds or more. And while they’re a minor irritant at first, you’ll eventually learn to fear them. Late in the game, after your fourth or fifth death at the hands of the same cheap-ass boss, they’re an infuriating roadblock that makes playing through the game significantly more frustrating. (And in case you’re wondering, installing the game to the 360’s hard drive did nothing to shorten them.)

Above: Also, we’re pretty sure alien motherships shouldn't look this blurry in 2011

When the shooting finally starts, things definitely improve – but even then, DNF’s a mostly average shooter, with rare moments of brilliance. Decapitating pigcops with a shotgun is fun, sure, but it’s nothing you haven’t seen before – and even if that’s all you really want from the game, you’re probably still going to be disappointed.

Some early reviews have said that DNF hasn’t really changed since the days of Duke Nukem 3D, and that’s partly true. The enemies look and behave more or less the same as they did in DN3D, and while a few unspectacular alien guns have been added to Duke’s arsenal, the weapons you’ll actually want to use – which range from shotguns and pipe bombs to shrink rays and freeze rays – are nearly identical to their DN3D counterparts. (A couple of the non-weapon items from DN3D return as well, specifically the Holo-Duke decoy and a bottle of steroids, and they’re joined by beer – which makes Duke tougher – and Duke Vision, which enables him to see in the dark.)

Above: Actually, wandering around blind here might be less creepy

At the same time, DNF actually has undergone a lot of changes from DN3D. It’s just that they feel like strained attempts to fit in with modern shooters, and very few of them are for the better. Where Duke once was able to carry a full arsenal everywhere he went, he’s now limited to just two guns at a time. Where he could previously soak up bullets like a sponge, he’s now at the mercy of his “Ego” health meter, which is quick to recharge, but so fragile that it can’t take more than a few hits before he’ll need to scramble for cover. (You can permanently add onto it by finding “ego-boosting” items, however, which helps a little.) It's all very Halo, and it diminishes the feeling of being an overpowered, steroid-pounding badass.

Worse, the shooting’s been broken up with faintly annoying seesaw-physics puzzles (i.e. throw some heavy barrels into this shipping container to make it tip over and form a ramp you can climb), which crop up almost as frequently as the unnecessary, button-mashing quick time events.  And where Duke once had the choice of paying strippers to flash him, or cruelly blasting them into gibs, he’s now forced to put up with the company of numerous invulnerable NPCs – almost none of whom are strippers – who don’t even have the decency to flinch when shot.

Above: See?

The real clincher, however, is the impact you now have on your environment. While DN3D filled its levels with interesting, incidental objects that invited experimentation and destruction, DNF mostly settles for giving you a lot of things to poke at – like answering machines, calendars, playable pinball machines and a couple surfaces you can draw on – and leaving it at that.

A perfect example of this is the toilets. In Duke Nukem 3D, it was possible to find a toilet, piss in it, blow it up with a pipe bomb and drink the resulting geyser of water for health. Maybe you’d even blow up the wall behind it, if you were lucky, and find a hidden cache of cool stuff. This time around, toilets are indestructible, and good only for a useless, one-note pee joke and maybe – maybe – the occasional floating turd that you can grab and fling around uselessly. That’s kind of interesting, I guess, but throwing shit simply isn’t as much fun as breaking shit.

Above: Hooray(?)

That’s all disappointing, but again, DNF does have some cool moments, most (but not all) of which come toward the end of the game. A handful of the levels shrink Duke down to the size of an action figure, for example, which turns otherwise unremarkable environments into enormous jumping puzzles, filled with similarly tiny enemies (or, more menacingly, full-sized ones that aggressively try to stomp Duke flat). One of these levels even gives you a little RC car to pilot, although driving it through floor after floor of a burning casino gets kind of tedious, especially considering you’ll have to frequently stop and figure out some puzzle to clear the way for your ride.

More Info

Release date: Jun 14 2011 - PC, Xbox 360, PS3 (US)
Jun 10 2011 - PC, Xbox 360, PS3 (UK)
Available Platforms: PC, Xbox 360, PS3
Genre: Shooter
Published by: 2K Games
Developed by: 3D Realms, Gearbox
Franchise: Duke Nukem
ESRB Rating:
Mature: Blood and Gore, Intense Violence, Mature Humor, Nudity, Strong Language, Strong Sexual Content, Use of Drugs, Use of Alcohol
PEGI Rating:


  • Themadkossak - June 14, 2011 5:47 a.m.

    wow 12 odd years and all it gets is a 6? good job to the devs for destroying an entire generations hopes
  • MrGreed - June 14, 2011 5:49 a.m.

    Who didnt see this coming? Im still going to get it though.
  • batman5273 - June 14, 2011 5:52 a.m.

    I am reviewing the game for So far I got to play to the casino. And I agree, little action and then long walking around wondering where to go. And don't get me started on the load times. I even have the game installed on my Xbox and it takes forever to reload a check point or reload when you die. So far it feels like a 1st person shooter with swearing. Kinda dull. I agree that Bulletstorm is much better!
  • metalmademedeaf - June 14, 2011 5:58 a.m.

    This sounds like a huge disappointment... Sounds like another rent for me, instead of a summer purchase.
  • Balaska - June 14, 2011 6 a.m.

    @MrGreed, I saw this coming, look at all the other classic games that have been updated over the years (Mario and Zelda spring to mind) they kept the ideas that made them great but added so much more. In a world post Half-Life, Portal, Battlefield and Bioshock, an FPS really has to do something special to be worth your time.
  • huntreilly25 - June 14, 2011 6:07 a.m.

    based on the review I was expecting less than a 6...a 5 at most
  • SpikroddNG - June 14, 2011 6:11 a.m.

    I'm seriously unsure whether or not investing a full 100 bucks in a special edition is worth it now... I don't care if I have a bust of The Duke himself overseeing my workspace. ...actually I'm in it for the bust now.
  • YuGiOhisbetterthanMagic - June 14, 2011 6:15 a.m.

    I bought the Balls of Steel Edition. I dont care if the game sucks, as a person who played the FIST Duke Nukem games as a kid, the bust was worth 100 bucks, even if its made of plastic. or paper.
  • Phil0syfee - June 14, 2011 6:16 a.m.

    While I saw this coming I am still a huge fan of Duke. I have been a fan of the series since the original 2D games and will always be a fan. I just hope that Duke can possibly become something greater now that this game is done with. Here's to the future (another 12 odd years).
  • kyle94 - June 14, 2011 6:21 a.m.

    After so much time, it's not really surprising. It was first announced in '97. There are reasons why it was pushed back so much, and it's not "They wanted to make the game better". When Gearbox got their hands on it, it was probably a mess. To me, Duke Nukem Forever is the prime example of internal problems, only in the videogame business. You see it occasionally with movies. If a movie is changing hands, directors, writers, and is in development hell for years, then you know it's probably not going to be that good when it comes out. Same thing happened with Duke Nukem Forever. It's actually kinda sad really, but to me not a surprise. Really, your hopes should've been dashed and stayed down after four years in development.
  • Thequestion 121 - June 14, 2011 6:22 a.m.

    Ouch, I was looking forward to this game. Oh well.
  • TastiestJamb - June 14, 2011 6:22 a.m.

    I almost felt obligated to buy this... almost. Thanks for another concise review sir!
  • Gorlack312 - June 14, 2011 6:32 a.m.

    I was really happy when I heard it was announced that it finally going to be released. I was thinking DN3D with a major overhaul. Tons of weapons, new guns, Bulletstorm-esk way of killing pigcops........then I saw TotalBiscut's playthrough a weekago, drove over to Gamestop, cancled my pre-order, argued with the guy at the counter about how bad it looked, and pre-ordered Skyrim. That won't disappoint.
  • komadose - June 14, 2011 6:46 a.m.

    i knew this game ain't gonna be a masterpiece, but i though it would've been better than this... too little, too late. could've been ok 10 years ago.
  • JBizFoShiz - June 14, 2011 6:54 a.m.

    "All of this, incidentally, will take around 20-30 minutes to play through, and it’s peppered with dated pop-culture gags and annoying NPCs." So, they make you watch an episode of Family Guy during the intro sequence?
  • Fuzunga - June 14, 2011 7:02 a.m.

    A 6? So it's pretty good then. Above average, in fact. I was expecting a bad score like a 2 or 3 based on the text of the review.
  • quincytheodore - June 14, 2011 7:20 a.m.

    Honestly, I feel like playing last gen shooter, perhaps even worse. Completely agree with the loading time. Why it takes so long to load flat uninspiring setting is beyond me. It makes me sick, literally, I usually play shooter for hours, but one hour with Duke is nauseating enough. I thought I was already halfway through, but GR said it's long... This was not a good purchase.
  • lhjwamangoo - June 14, 2011 7:26 a.m.

    well im buying it. won't know for sure till i play it...some good games get bad score n bad games get good score... (like crysis2 was lame personally)
  • ultraextreme - June 14, 2011 7:32 a.m.

    Im getting it just for the titties. There, i said it.
  • mothbanquet - June 14, 2011 7:56 a.m.

    I'll still get it, I owe Duke that much. Still, at least now I know what to expect. Maybe now this game is out they can start a new one from scratch and give it the attention it deserves.

Showing 1-20 of 109 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000