Google+

Topics

PAX

We Recommend By ZergNet

21 comments

  • william-cross - September 7, 2013 2:20 a.m.

    Also, the part about Transistor's demo not being any different is factually false. There are a ton of changes since the initial unveiling at PAX East and not pointing that out is an enormous disservice to the hard work the guys over at Supergiant Games put into this vertical slice.
  • winner2 - September 5, 2013 7:18 a.m.

    That time force game story sounds a LOT like that old show Time Squad on cartoon network
  • rodger-walker - September 4, 2013 7:03 p.m.

    what no BF4?
  • Tidus0203 - September 4, 2013 5:14 p.m.

    The only two games i really care for are Dragon age 3 and titanfall. dont really care for indies as they are too short and half the time not worth the price.
  • william-cross - September 7, 2013 2:13 a.m.

    Yeah, you care about AAA shovelware that is filled to the brim with meaningless fluff and NEVER worth the 60 dollar price tag. You don't really care for innovative ideas that push the medium, are actually engaging without using stupid psychological tricks that work on farm animals and the usual gamer, and have some actually smart game design in them. You know, that thing that we should actually judge games on, merit?! Didn't expect the subaverage Joe to have good tastes though so keep doing what you're doing.
  • Tidus0203 - September 7, 2013 8:02 a.m.

    sure, but i rather buy Triple AAA titles that last me, then a few games i can beat in a few hours then im done with it.. Rayman legends is a Triple AAA title and im enjoying the heck out of it :D
  • shawksta - September 3, 2013 10:44 p.m.

    It looks like you made this for the sake of making a point that there were tons of indies and highlighting Titan Fall when you couldve done 2 separate articles. But hey, im not the decision head, you guys are, and its still a great article. They all are great DAT HALO GUNDAM WINGS EDITION er, i mean TITAN FALL hah XD
  • n00b - September 3, 2013 8:21 p.m.

    What if i told you that Titan Fall is a futuristic version of Attack on Titan?
  • Talvari - September 3, 2013 5:23 p.m.

    Titanfall looked pretty neat..until i saw the lack of animation and how weird wall running looked. I mean i'm sure they'll fix it by launch but for some reason that little thing made me just dislike it : |
  • blahman01 - September 3, 2013 5:01 p.m.

    "addicting" is not a word. The word you were probably looking for is "addictive". Don't bother arguing. Any journalist / editor worth their salt should know this.
  • TokenGamesRadarFurry - September 3, 2013 5:09 p.m.

    More people search for 'addicting' then 'addictive'. They went over this on the podcast once. As for it not being an actual word... http://www.thefreedictionary.com/addicting Also, fun fact: nobody actually cares.
  • blahman01 - September 3, 2013 5:17 p.m.

    @Token It makes no odds that more people search for "addicting". An online dictionary is hardly a qualified source. I care. You're wrong on three accounts. Good job.
  • ineedasweater - September 4, 2013 12:21 a.m.

    What about "I'm in the process of addicting my wife to sex."?
  • wadesmit - September 4, 2013 3:29 a.m.

    It's arguable though. Language evolves. If the vernacular is used more than what was previously the "correct" term, it simply becomes canonically correct in the language. With that said, "addicting" seems more an American vernacular. In South Africa, "addictive" is still predominantly used.
  • GOD - September 9, 2013 8:13 p.m.

    Words only exist to convey meaning. Having a problem with someone using a word that follows conventional conjugation and clearly conveys its meaning is ridiculous and frivolous. Dictionaries don't exist to confirm the legitimacy of words, they simply exist to spread a standardized meaning for specific words to provide clarity to our language. A word that clearly conveys meaning but isn't explicitly acknowledged by some kind of notable source is more valuable in expression than a word found in a 50 year old hard copy of a Merriam-Webster's dictionary that few people know the meaning of. For example: Chocoholic. I doubt you'd find that in any conventional dictionary, but everyone knows what it means and serves it's purpose as a word. Keep in mind every word was at some time or another not a word until, eventually, it was used enough that it became a common one that people would understand whenever they heard it. I suppose just as much as seeing it being used bugged you, seeing someone get on another on the basis of the semantics of whether something is a word or not, especially on a site where far crazier words are made up on a regular basis, really got under my skin.
  • blahman01 - September 3, 2013 5:13 p.m.

    I apologise for being blunt. I applaud the fact that you changed it. It's a pet peeve of mine.
  • GR_RyanTaljonick - September 3, 2013 5:23 p.m.

    No need, when you're right you're right.
  • KNITEpanda - September 3, 2013 7:45 p.m.

    Oops, I shoulda put the ' in that's. Oh no! I mean should have.
  • KNITEpanda - September 3, 2013 7:45 p.m.

    Its just a word...calm down. Never seen someone freak over a word thats already commonly used anyway.

Showing 1-20 of 21 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.