Google+

We Recommend

19 comments

  • mothbanquet - February 25, 2014 8:39 a.m.

    Also, it seems to me the humour was what Duke Nukem Forever wished it had gone for. Old-school and crass but in a brown-grey melancholy world of which we all seem to be so fond these days.
  • mothbanquet - February 25, 2014 8:35 a.m.

    I've always enjoyed the Wolfensteins, so this may well be worth a look. Certainly looks like an appropriate counterpart to ARMA's 1944 Invasion mod.
  • Dave2123 - August 2, 2013 11:18 a.m.

    This game does look good - I'm looking forward to seeing the reviews on it and and any playthroughs I can found (TheRadBrad hasn't let me down yet). Also, why can't I edit or at least reply to my own comments; it seems like a bit of an oversight to me.
  • Dave2123 - August 2, 2013 11:15 a.m.

    Also, scrap any HUD unless I'm wearing a helmet like Master Chief or something.
  • Dave2123 - August 2, 2013 11:15 a.m.

    What I desire most from a game, and have yet to play a game that comes anywhere near it, is realism. How is it possible that I can carry an infinite number of weapons and armour and items like in most games - My character in skyrim must have had about 100 tonnes of equipment on him by the end, that's not possible. Also, get rid of QTEs and those hints that tell you to press A to reload or climb a ledge or something. I can read the manual or just tell me once during a tutorial mission - not every single time. Also, it's not that great than the Nazis put a man on the moon then - the Americans did it in the 60s as well.
  • wiitard07 - February 24, 2014 11:37 a.m.

    Wat
  • david-wicks - June 12, 2013 9:50 p.m.

    they want iron sights, they want a cover system, Us fans of classic games don't actually want this shit.
  • Dave2123 - August 2, 2013 11:09 a.m.

    The problem is that most people aren't fans of classic shooters or, like me, have never played a classic shooter. We want good game mechanics not a frustrating game where we're like: 'Why the hell didn't they let us use iron sights, this is so stupid'. I would also add, a bit hesitantly, stop living in the past, embrace new ways of gaming, it's never going to be like it was 'in your day', because technology has advanced so that we can make games more realistic and have iron sights and cover systems.
  • mothbanquet - February 25, 2014 8:33 a.m.

    Sad but sorta true. And I'm an old git.
  • jh4911 - May 29, 2013 9:07 a.m.

    Looks interesting.
  • shawksta - May 28, 2013 8:05 p.m.

    NEAT
  • archnite - May 28, 2013 5:24 p.m.

    14 year coma some how gets BJ from WWII to 1990? I'm confused. But its awesome to here he has the same issues with the moon that I do. This is the shooter I'm looking forward to.
  • Dave2123 - August 2, 2013 11:03 a.m.

    It's set in the 60s, but the Nazis have some weird tech that means they're more advanced in the 60s than everyone else is in the 90s.
  • PatHan-bHai - May 28, 2013 1:35 p.m.

    The Big Friendly Giant was my favourite gun in Doom.
  • PatHan-bHai - May 29, 2013 8:57 a.m.

    Then I should you should prolly upgrade to the latest OS so that It would work the way it's supposed to :P
  • archnite - May 28, 2013 5:26 p.m.

    I preferred the Bio-force Gun for all the Bio-ing and forcing it could do.
  • antiAntag0nist - May 28, 2013 10:09 a.m.

    Starbreeze? Isn't Machine Games developing this?
  • TanookiMan - May 28, 2013 11:28 a.m.

    I think the article meant to point out that MachineGames consists of the major developers who left Starbreeze.

Showing 1-19 of 19 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.