We Recommend By ZergNet


  • ClusterShart - January 27, 2012 10:09 a.m.

    Please don't vote for Ron Paul.
  • tofu666 - January 29, 2012 3:13 a.m.

    Who do you suggest then?
  • Japanaman - January 27, 2012 11:23 a.m.

    I want a President who enjoys video games in the White House (During breaks, not during Office Hours; and on Air Force One)
  • babyhenchy1 - January 27, 2012 8:49 p.m.

    Well all the candidates pretty much suck and it's not just their stances on video games.
  • lilbuddha - January 28, 2012 11:36 a.m.

    "Or get angry and assume that we intentionally left it out for political reasons or because we have an agenda and call us names, if you'd rather do that. " Well I could mention that Ron Paul got the shortest blurb out of the story... just like how he gets the shortest blurb on every other media source in existence... which kinda sticks to the claims that he's been getting a "media blackout" of sorts for years now... its just funny it trickles down so far as to a video game website.
  • yonderTheGreat - February 27, 2012 4:46 p.m.

    He gets the "shortest blurb" (which is longer than Perry's) because there's so little to object with. The persecuted victim mentality of Paul supporters might be the most annoying thing about Paul.
  • thesteve2 - January 29, 2012 9:04 a.m.

    Flying dildos LMAO
  • AnarchyZombie - February 27, 2012 4:54 p.m.

  • LordofNothing - February 27, 2012 6:47 p.m.

    Didn't GR already post this a while ago? Anyways always nice to see it being brought up
  • RacoonHail - February 27, 2012 7:03 p.m.

    Ron Paul might have a good view point for video games, but he is bat shit crazy on most other subjects. Please don't just support him because he is pro free speech. He is also anti-public education, and has prehistoric views on economics *cough* gold standard *cough*. But all the candidates have problems. This is a very informative article, but picking a candidate on one issue is really stupid.
  • Esquoret - February 27, 2012 10:16 p.m.

    The Constitution is not bat shit crazy, and neither is Ron Paul. The man is sensible on all issues. The Federal Reserve System, on the other hand, is bat shit crazy in its approach of printing unlimited money (precisely because of the lack of the gold standard) and screwing up the whole economy. A limited government will direct the wealth back to the people, allowing everything to improve in quality, including education.
  • aliengmr - February 28, 2012 5:41 p.m.

    No, it means instead of the government taxing you, you pay private businesses for everything. I love the one about the private sector policing itself. Take away all the regulations the private sector has been trying get around for years and suddenly they all become angels. right. The reality is that is that in the very unlikely event Ron Paul became President he would do nothing he says he wants to do. Congress won't let him. A Ron Paul Presidency is a pipe dream folks, Libertarian ideas always sound great until you dig a little deeper, then it get scary.
  • haloreacharound - February 27, 2012 7:03 p.m.

    Hey Hollander. You forgot to reference the daily show and Colbert report since that's where you get your "news". PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE DO NOT VOTE If you aren't well informed and let's face it, most of you aren't.
  • mentalityljs - February 27, 2012 7:45 p.m.

    "Let's creep thru the frozen isle and think one thought, trick the bridesmaid to get her to take it off, she'll pull the mushroom out, unzip the windflap and love and you can't go wroooooong." ~ That is all.
  • Esquoret - February 27, 2012 10:09 p.m.

    The Constitution protects people's rights and freedom. Ron Paul protects the Constitution. Enough said.
  • ThatFanInThePeacoat - February 27, 2012 10:39 p.m.

    Pssst. Nobody mention the Meadow Mountain Massacre to Romney. It's so cute that he thinks violence didn't exist before videogames and movies. Oh crap here he comes. *Cough* *Cough* Hey Mr. Romney, nice weather we're having today, right?
  • ThatFanInThePeacoat - February 27, 2012 10:40 p.m.

    Whoops I mean Mountain Meadows.
  • db1331 - November 1, 2012 12:53 p.m.

    I read that as "Mountain Dew Massacre." I was like, "WTF where was I during that?!"
  • PevMaster - February 28, 2012 7:50 a.m.

    Despite being a Republican (can't stand the left-wing commies in England and Australia) I'd vote for Obama this time. The others all seem like cunts.
  • profile0000 - February 28, 2012 12:02 p.m.

    Well, you need to stand out in a Primary election, I suppose. The best way to do that would be, in theory, acting like a insane cunt. That's how American politics generally work: Fight for personal ideology in Primaries, fight for party ideology in the General election, and then do basically what the last guy did once you become President. Isn't it wonderful?
  • wheresmymonkey - November 2, 2012 3:09 a.m.

    Hey we're not commies. We're socialist's there a difference. If the reports coming out of the states about the crazy shite the republicans want to do with the rights are women are true. I'm happy to ive in the UK. Sounds like the USA is on the virge of becmnog the monster it rebelled against in the first place. Land of the free.. unless you're a women,or poor, or not a christian, or an immegrant. Unlike the UK where people are free to live and worship how they want, the poor are given support and women are allowed to do whatever they want tiwth their own bodies. Welcome to Britain. we're now more american than america.

Showing 81-100 of 114 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000


Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.