Dracula 2001 review

Why you can trust GamesRadar+ Our experts review games, movies and tech over countless hours, so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about our reviews policy.

The latest film to be flogged under the "Wes Craven Presents..." banner offers further evidence that the words "quality" and "control" have long deserted the horror master's vocabulary. But what was Craven expecting when he gave his approval to a film penned by the screenwriter of Highlander Endgame and helmed by a man whose only other directing credit is Prophecy III: The Ascent?

This feeble attempt to haul Count Vlad into the new millennium is a humdrum effort by all involved. In the age of Buffy, giving Bram Stoker's immortal blood-sucker a youthful makeover should at least start with a worthwhile script and decent characters. But although all the stock vampire trademarks are here - blood, garlic, decapitations, stakes through hearts - what's missing is wit, storytelling panache and real scares.

Suckers for generic teen horror flicks - - and their staples of dodgy acting, gaping plot holes and heaving bosoms - - might find something tempting about Dracula 2001. But for everyone else, this is a dull, plodding update of the Bram Stoker classic.

The Total Film team are made up of the finest minds in all of film journalism. They are: Editor Jane Crowther, Deputy Editor Matt Maytum, Reviews Ed Matthew Leyland, News Editor Jordan Farley, and Online Editor Emily Murray. Expect exclusive news, reviews, features, and more from the team behind the smarter movie magazine.