The Last of Us review

  • Powerful, mature storytelling
  • Intelligent, ultra-versatile combat
  • Jaw-dropping visuals
  • The steep learning curve early on

This is no mere action game you’re reading about. It isn’t even ‘just’ a very good one. It’s a bona fide, genre-defining, once-or-twice-a-generation Big Deal; the game Naughty Dog has always threatened to make but never really delivered. The Last of Us’ storytelling is as important a part of the experience as any element of its gameplay. In fact the two are so intertwined that it’s impossible to separate one from the other. After years of bold claims from multiple parties, it could be argued that The Last of Us is the first truly mature interactive narrative in the action genre. As such, it’s a genuine landmark, and an utterly fitting representation of both the PS3’s last chapter and that of current-gen gaming’s evolution since 2005.

Beginning 20 years after a mind-controlling fungus parasite has devastated humankind, The Last of Us finds protagonist Joel as broken, hardened, and locked-down as the world around him. Being a man of advanced years, he’s one of the few characters in the game with a clear memory of the world before the outbreak. He spends his days trying to exorcise the loss that haunts him, burying the past and acknowledging only the daily struggles of the present. 

"...the game is a thrilling, emotionally pounding and intellectually nourishing experience."

Immediately it’s clear that The Last of Us is a very different beast to what we’re used to from the genre. Naughty Dog unapologetically replaces Uncharted’s charismatic action-movie bluster with underplayed, slow burning grit. Where once there were sparky archetypes and gleaming, stylised environments, now there are closed, flawed, almost unlikeable people inhabiting a grimy, mundane, painfully realistic urban nightmare. It’s only when Joel is tasked with delivering 14-year-old Ellie to an underground movement known as the Fireflies that his journeys, both geographical and personal, begin.

While the meat of the action takes the form of brutally demanding encounters with the human and less-than-human threats inhabiting the no man’s land outside of America’s fortified cities, that’s literally and figuratively only half the story. The Last of Us is billed as "survival action," and the ceaseless realisation of the former concept makes every second of the game a thrilling, emotionally pounding and intellectually nourishing experience.

Built around a solid stealth system driven by line-of-sight, The Last of Us’ action encourages an entirely player-driven approach to almost every encounter. Provided he can scavenge the gear needed to build and feed them, Joel has a healthy array of potential tools at his disposal, ranging from firearms to Molotov cocktails and nail-bombs. The most powerful weapons he has though, are thought and tactical adaptation. And that makes every encounter in the game fresh, exciting, terrifying and deliciously unpredictable.

Wide, sprawling, multi-leveled environments encourage and reward creative play at every turn. All of Joel’s tools have great versatility, able to be used directly or more cleverly for misdirection. While not really a traditional stealth game, direct confrontations, even with the rarity of a fully loaded gun in hand, are unwise. Emphasising the worn-out, desperate state of the world, ammo is in painfully short supply, even from enemy drops. With no fancy silenced weapons available, firing even a single shot is akin to sending up a flare inviting enemies to Joel’s location. Instead, it’s best--and far more satisfying--to play cat-and-mouse with the sophisticated AI, using its knowledge of your last location to herd it around and manipulate its behaviour, hanging on by your fingernails to stay just one step ahead and maintain an advantage. It’s as exciting to the brain as it is to the adrenal gland.  

The items that fuel the crafting system require studious searching of the environment to acquire. And even when you have the bits, crafting takes real, in-game time. As does using the manual healing system, assuming you’ve made enough health kits. Go into a fight unprepared, and finding a safe place to resupply becomes a life-or-death challenge in itself.

"...the slow-burning pace infuses every encounter with immense emotional weight." 

That’s the wonderful thing. This isn’t a set of separate, isolated elements. It’s made up of a whole stack of disciplines and possibilities, working together organically to create a deep, layered, ever-changing, and constantly stimulating whole. Options are always open, every move has an equal risk and reward, and with no rules or penalties governing your approach, any decision that keeps you alive is the right decision. But with Ellie by Joel’s side throughout, each choice comes loaded with a weighty sense of responsibility.

But as stated, that’s only half of the story. Because part of the reason The Last of Us’ violent encounters remain so tooth-rattlingly affecting is how sporadically placed they are throughout the game. The resonance of the (necessarily) brutal violence never dissipates through over-repetition, but more so, the slow-burning nature of the game’s pacing infuses every encounter with immense emotional weight.

This is a game of extended, ambient travel sequences and powerfully underplayed character development. The vast, gorgeously decaying vistas of a world reclaimed by nature are a constant reminder of both the weight of Joel and Ellie’s quest and the necessity of vigilance and violence at all times. They’re also a source of visual wonder, bringing out joy and confusion in Ellie while reminding Joel of a better past. In these quieter sections, be they meandering environmental puzzles in which Joel finds ways for the less capable Ellie to progress, or simply lengthy treks through the urban wilderness of a society long-since collapsed, the immense quality of the game’s writing and performances really shines.

The slow exploration of an abandoned town might spark up equal excitement and sadness in Ellie as she discovers the long-dead remains of a world she never got to know. Her playful instinct might take over as she explores an abandoned neighbourhood while Joel hunts for supplies. And the game’s narratively minded treatment of even mundane tasks ensures that the frequent scavenging never becomes tedious busywork.

"There might be a great deal of downtime between the action, but the game never rests."

Apparently empty areas are often the ones most packed with content. Not much might seem to happen while exploring a deserted plaza for gear, but these are the times that ambient, environmental storytelling will most frequently trigger quietly significant exchanges between the two leads. 

As such, the high stakes, low resources and knowledge that anything could be around the next corner feed directly into the importance of each and every trinket found. You only survive by what you bring to the equation, giving every life-saving bomb or trap a personal significance. Particularly if the parts used to build it came from the hands of a dead family making a similar survival bid to Joel and Ellie’s. There might be a great deal of downtime between the action, but the game never rests.

It’s the interplay during minute, delicately sketched events like these that brings about the many subtle interactions through which the characters’ personalities and viewpoints gently rub off on each other, gradually but completely transforming the two and their relationship. Ellie’s curiosity at a world Joel is trying to forget slowly forces him to modify his outlook and actions, while his weary, coldly logical demeanour starts to inform Ellie’s approach. 

And all of this feeds straight back into both gameplay and tone: Ellie’s hardening makes her an increasingly useful combat aid, while also raising uncomfortable questions about what she might be turning into--questions you’ll be forced to address every time she bricks an enemy in the head to help you stay alive. It’s a violent game, but also sometimes a game about violence, and that’s a rare and worthy achievement indeed.

Yes, The Last Of Us does have a competitive online component, and it’s far from the hastily cobbled together addition some might expect. Rather, Factions mode proves itself to be surprisingly adept at crafting thoughtful team deathmatches. 

Split into two modes (Supply Raid and Survivors) two teams of four players are pitted against each other with a finite number of lives. In the former, each side has 20 lives rationed out between its members; the first team to wittle the other’s number down to zero are declared the winners. Survivors goes one further and completely does away with respawns all together over desperately tense three minute rounds. 

"Multiplayer captures the ideology of single-player beautifully..." 

Compliments to Naughty Dog for creating a multiplayer that defies convention and focuses on slow-burning strategy. The emphasis is very much on survival first, reckless killing a distant second. In that sense, Factions captures the ideology of single-player beautifully, even if it is unlikely to capture the COD crowd.  

Built of a culmination of everything that action gaming has grown to become over the last eight years, The Last of Us is the definitive statement on what the genre has achieved thus far. Made of wildly eclectic gameplay mechanics polished to a sheen, bound intelligently and movingly to one of the most affecting narratives in games, The Last of Us succeeds where so many pretenders have failed. 

It combines DNA strands from across the genre, yet reworks and recontextualises them to become far more than the sum of its parts. Its storytelling is peerless, as affecting and multi-layered as it is grounded, underplayed and real. In terms of everything the modern action game has strived to be, The Last of Us is the full-stop at the end of the sentence, leaving no more to be said. Until next-gen. If this is our starting point for that, then the next five to ten years could be truly amazing. 

More Info

Release date: Jul 29 2014 - PS4
Jun 14 2013 - PS3 (US)
Q4 2013 - PS3 (UK)
Available Platforms: PS4, PS3
Genre: Action
Published by: Sony Computer Entertainment
Developed by: Naughty Dog
ESRB Rating:
Mature: Blood and Gore, Intense Violence, Sexual Themes, Strong Language

We Recommend By ZergNet


  • neoghio89 - June 5, 2013 7:09 a.m.

    Looking forward to this!
  • injustice45 - June 5, 2013 7:31 a.m.

    Five Stars! Wow! This may be the Game of the Year right here!
  • BladedFalcon - June 5, 2013 7:31 a.m.

    ...Holy fuckballs! I was super excited about this game, I expected it to be fantastic, but that it's getting straight 10s across the board on the main sites I visit? that's fucking impressive! Not to mention that well, from the sound of it, it aces the most important things in a game to me: Story, Gameplay, and Atmosphere. Shit... now the wait to get it is going to be UNBEARABLE! Argh!
  • lilj805 - June 5, 2013 7:41 a.m.

    Day-one download for me!
  • taokaka - June 5, 2013 7:47 a.m.

    I was definitely going to get this but now I'm going to have to rush over to the store as soon as possible and preorder a copy.
  • Rhymenocerous - June 5, 2013 7:48 a.m.

    GREAT review. I'm genuinely excited for this game, and I haven't felt like this for quite some time. Also, does anyone else think this like a more "gamey" (I don't mean that derogatory at all) Walking Dead? Joel and Ellie's relationship is VERY similar to Lee Everett and Clementine, is it not?
  • BladedFalcon - June 5, 2013 8:02 a.m.

    Not necessarily. I mean, for one, Clem was what... 9-10 years old? Ellie is 14, and I think that DOES change the interaction with the kid a great deal. Because Clem retains more of an innocence and fright that a 14 year old would no longer have, she also is far more vulnerable, because up until the very end, Clem really wasn't capable of defending herself, understandably so. There's also the difference in context. Both Lee and Clem are survivors in a world that JUST went straight to hell. Both still are adapting and coping in their own way with the loss of the life they use to have. In contrast, Joel has been thoroughly changed after living the 20 years that have passed since hell broke loose, While Ellie seems to have grown up both accustomed BUT also sheltered from the full reality of the world around her. I can definitely see where you draw the comparison though, but if anything, Joel and Ellie's interaction kinda reminds me more of Booker and Elizabeth's in Bioshock Infinite, and even THAT is a wildly different kind of relationship on it's own.
  • Rhymenocerous - June 5, 2013 11:49 a.m.

    Ok yeah, good point(s). I haven't played Infinite yet though - waiting for it to be cheap. The Last of Us takes priority, and also I don't think the "early steep learning curve" is a bad thing either.
  • BladedFalcon - June 5, 2013 1:07 p.m.

    Yeah, I also agree that doesn't sound like a negative thing at all. But y'know, warnings to casuals and such.
  • BlueScorpion91 - June 5, 2013 7:48 a.m.

    I'm so sad that I sold my PS3(it was on it's way out) and now can't play this game. Sounds brilliant. And I must say I thought that the actual review was a great read. No spoilers or comparing it to other games, you just reviewed what was there as apposed to what should/shouldn't be there. 5 stars to you, David.
  • Vordhosbn - June 5, 2013 7:54 a.m.

    I've been ignoring this game for ages, but having read this review I guess it's time to be excited, it does sound like one hell of a game.
  • Bloodstorm - June 5, 2013 7:56 a.m.

    Why did it have to be good? Now it is going to torture me even more that I can't get it right away. Needs money! Can. Not. Wait. First $60 I get my hands on is going to this.
  • TheMcFinder - June 5, 2013 7:57 a.m.

    that was an intense review. it actually makes me want a ps3, a feeling that is completely foreign to me.
  • gilgamesh310 - June 5, 2013 8:18 a.m.

    5/5. gee, I never would have guessed that. It seems every high profile release must be given a top score. Bioshock Infinite was riddled with flaws and this likely is too. Time to wait for some unofficial reviews.
  • BlueScorpion91 - June 5, 2013 8:28 a.m.

    If you really think that way then why do you bother to visit "official"(whatever you mean by that) reviews?
  • gilgamesh310 - June 5, 2013 8:31 a.m.

    Because I used to have faith in them but at this point most really just sicken me. I haven't come here in a while. The only reviews I trust at this point are from people who aren't funded.
  • veryweirdguy - June 5, 2013 9:17 a.m.

    So...non professional reviewers. Seems smart.
  • BladedFalcon - June 5, 2013 8:32 a.m.

    And yet, Dead Space 3 didn't get a top score, Sim City Didn't get a top score, Tomb Raider didn't quite get a top score either. So your over-generalization seems a bit off. Also, official or unofficial, reviews are always the opinions of other people. And while unofficial reviews might lack the perceived "corporal bias" you see to believe professional reviews have. Unofficial ones are always much more unreliable and hyperbolic anyway. Just get the damn game and judge for yourself. It's what you always end up doing anyway :P
  • gilgamesh310 - June 5, 2013 8:39 a.m.

    It was obvious that Dead Space 3 wasn't going down well with people long before it was released so it's not surprising that journalists cater to that audience in their reviews. TLoU had people calling it the best game ever after only just seeing 5 minutes of footage in trailers. Tomb Raider got a higher score than it deserved if you ask me too. The storytelling in the game was a mess. Yes but people who aren't getting paid are likely to be more honest in what they say, as they won't feel the need to cater to any specific audience, they just say what they feel. I have been reading reviews for a very long time and over time I've come to realise this. Unnoficial ones often go into more detail and highlight the clear flaws that games might have more so than official ones. I will be getting it. That is likely the only way I'll know for myself. There's no denying that. I don't even think it will be bad but I very highly doubt it will be worthy of the top scores it's getting, just like the Uncharted series.
  • BladedFalcon - June 5, 2013 9:09 a.m.

    Yes, unofficial reviews also tend to make mountains out of molehills, and often let their own expectations and tastes give an objective view of the game. I am currently playing Tomb Raider, not yet finished, but I definitely think it's a game deserving of a 9 so far. And while the story already has shown it has some lame supernatural elements, I'm still finding it far more interesting that most games of this sort, such as uncharted or GOW. That, and the exploration elements remind of of a metroid or castlevania game, which is always fantastic in my books. Anyway, yeah, the only way we'll know for sure how good the game will be shall be by playing it. I just like that it does seem to deliver in most of what promised in the trailers. I mean, even without playing the game, I can already tell the dialog and characters are much better played out, the setting is fantastic, and the story from what we know so far already sounds way better and more interesting that anything uncharted ever strove for. But again, won't know for sure till I play it.

Showing 1-20 of 96 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000


Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.