Google+

All EA Games articles on GamesRadar

    • Loading...

      gazzc
      First of all, I am not really sure an FPS game is best suited to a subscription model, it works [...]
      First of all, I am not really sure an FPS game is best suited to a subscription model, it works in MMO's because people realise that there are certain overheads involved such as keeping huge servers online 100% of the time, direct in game assistance to players, regular new content etc. You can not really call BF3 a 24/7 service just because people play it a lot, as the devs/publisher are not constantly working behind the scenes to keep the game running - they can just release it and forget about it so there is no actual justification to charge people a recurring fee to play other than greed. Secondly, I would in some ways be prepared to subscribe to play but EA would have to seriously improve what they are offering, I would expect new content on an extremely regular basis. They would also have to pull their finger out when it comes to supporting the game as there is no way I would pay a subscription to a half finished game that gets patched twice a year. There is just no way at all I would pay a subscription if their patching/customer service remained at its current standard.
    • Loading...

      laxsagacity
      I will maybe accept a subscription based model if there is no upfront cost. just the subscription. So if a [...]
      I will maybe accept a subscription based model if there is no upfront cost. just the subscription. So if a game is crap I will have just spent the 10 bucks for the first month. Also cost must decrease over time. Let the studios put the game and its long lasting appeal with their wallet. Battlefield 3 is dying on PC 5 months after launch. It's still full of bugs and the promised aggressive dlc in the first 6 months didn't happen. If dice wants to charge they should have to live up to expectations. As is people do t feel they got what they paid for. The fact of the matter is, this disappointing game would be dead if they charged subscriptions. The idea of full price and then subscriptions for a game they had to mislead an entire platform on is absurd. Supscriptions only if it means we pay less for disappointing games. There has to be a give and take. Due to the studios not wanting to do this, only wanting excess, it won't work. A clear example of where developers like DICe just want to rip off customers. I'm in Australia. The cost of battlefiled:bad comapny 2: Vietnam is still $19.95 on PC. There are basically no populated servers any more. in the last 6 months the fullest I've seen is 5 players. yet the charge regardless of if the product is worth it. I will only think subscription is good with out the 80-100 buck upfront cost. Then also if the subscription is flexible. I don't want to have to pay for a year when I Au get sick of a game after a few weeks or months.
    • Loading...

      amagasakiseb Basically what they all said: piss off.
    • Loading...

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.