Quantcast

Lord of the Rings: Conquest

Also known as: LotR 2008

One ring to screw it all up

Dear Pandemic,

We liked Mercenaries 2, but after some of our competitors unfairly kicked its face off you’d be forgiven for thinking we reviewers relish the opportunity to stomp a game’s head in. Nothing could be further from the truth. For one thing, bad games make for hard work. First, you have to play long enough to form an educated and authoritative critique. Then, you have to write several hundred words on something truly awful in a manner which your readers will find engaging, even though the game has stolen every ounce of your fading holiday buzz, and all you really want to say is “DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE”.

The very worst game reviews are laundry lists of good and bad points – this is good but this is bad, but that’s okay because this is good – bemoaning the faults and apologising for them by way of the stronger points. It’s the easiest review any writer can bang out, but even for that you need one redeeming quality. Just one, Pandemic. Just one would have been enough. Now, Star Wars: Battlefront was a pretty strong game. Even now, it sits just behind Halo 2 as the second most played online videogame on the original Xbox. It’s obvious why you’d think the same trick would work for the Lord of the Rings franchise; it’s all about the epic battles, after all. Fans of the book would probably dispute that, but – hey! – what do the nerds know, right?

It might have worked, too. EA did a fine job banging out three LOTR games cribbing from the Dynasty Warriors template, didn’t they? And those games were produced by the guys who did Greg Hastings Tournament Paintball, and the unfortunately named and now defunct Stormfront Studios, so how hard could it be, right? Well, you sure showed them. Battlefront managed a thoroughly decent bit of shooty-shooty-bang-bang between Empire and Rebel forces, but Conquest takes its cue from Dynasty Warriors and makes the combat so intangible and repetitive, and the combo system so incompetent there’s not a single decent punch-up to be had.

Where Battlefront looked good, Conquest is Keith Richards; where Battlefront had interesting and almost-balanced character classes, Conquest has a band of wooden-legged freaks who moonwalk like the Former King of Pop; where Battlefront had fun vehicles to pilot and fight, Conquest has the gimpiest horses since Two Worlds, and Cave Trolls and Ents which, frankly, look like claymation diarrhea.

Worst of all, where Battlefront showed respect to its inspiration and paid homage to the license, Conquest is more like an offensive parody. Remember that bit in Tolkien’s masterpiece where the loyal-unto-death lapdog Wormtongue gave his life fighting hordes of Middle Earth’s finest heroes in defense of his beloved boss Saruman, before Gandalf sprinted to the top of his tower to circle-strafe and lightning-zap the bugger to death? And how about the part where every battle was narrated with hilariously bombastic bellowed insights like “YOUR POISON ARROWS ARE POWERFUL. USE THEM!”? That’s right, Pandemic. That didn’t happen, did it? No.

And we know what you’re going to say – it’s designed to be played online. But even if you’d built a multiplayer game as magnificent and as robust as Saruman’s tower at Isengard, it would collapse like a house of cards because you’ve built it on foundations of poor mechanics, horrible presentation, dull combat, worthless maps, and total contempt for the mythology. There isn’t an online gamer, Battlefront player, Dynasty Warriors nerd, movie buff, or Lord of the Rings fanatic on Earth who could be satisfied with Conquest. It should ship with the pre-owned sticker already on the box.

We still remember Full Spectrum Warrior, you know. You’re better than this. Much, much, much better.

Jan 14, 2009

You'll love
  • Hilariously awful dialogue
  • Wormtongue is a badass!
  • Poison arrows are powerful!
You'll hate
  • Shows contempt for the license
  • Woeful combat design throughout
  • Looks terrible to boot

 
16 Comments
Order Comments: Newest First | Oldest First
DarthSackboy  - 10 months 7 days ago 
Aww man, I was going to get this, oh well, if its this bad, no way! The demo is pretty funny, the narrator really enthusiastic!

Also, the words I had to type in were "flannel" and "loo". And why do we have to do one for every comment?
im99sam8  - 10 months 6 days ago 
Hmmmmm im still unsure whether or not to buy this.I really REALLY liked the demo (must have spent at least 14 hours on it)but then u go and make me worried with this review. arrrrggh so much stress =(
uho  - 10 months 6 days ago 
This is probably one of the worst reviews I've ever read. It talks more about Pandemic's games rather than Lord of the Rings: Conquest. There's no flow, no coherence, it's just terrible.
jar-head  - 10 months 6 days ago 
uho, buy the game, spend your money on it, and When you give it a crap rating, you might of, just Might have, though about why Games Radar gives Honest reviews, This is probably the most unbiased game website i have Ever found, honest to every, if not all of what they publish. GR is here to bring me up-to-date info on games, to give the consumer honest views and opinions so we wont blow 60+ on a crap game. GR ftw, they also somehow boost my buzz, im in love.
Rhesus  - 10 months 5 days ago 
Well I played the demo, and I thought it looked good but, I usually trust you GR. So I think I'll be keepin' $60 this month.
Crazydutch  - 10 months 5 days ago 
i as a real LOTR fan i truely, utterly HATED this game. my god its got NOTHING to do with the original story, remember aragon was in helms deep wih his king of gondor armor and army of the dead on his side? thought so. the graphics look like a 6 year old ps2 game, the classes all have a stunning 3 moves! 3 moves.. thats all. donkey kong on the SNES has more moves then these guys. and probably the most annoying of all.. if you die you have to start a level ALL OVER,no checkpoints or anything no, hear the same annoying narrator guy screaming the same line over and over again. agh i just lack the vocabulary to describe how much this game sucks.
and if you think well.. but it has large scale battles they are cool! no..no they are not the orcs just come in waves of 20 and are all exacly the same.. Remember that point where the mouth of sauron was a mage and has a staff just like saruman's ? neither do i.

conclusion: please just please (i cant stress it enough) do not buy this, you will regret it.
jamesnash  - 10 months 4 days ago 
i tried the demo and thought it looked worse and plays worse than the old ps2 game two towers, so i popped it in to have a go, and i was right!

how did they go so wrong with this?!
Reubenguy  - 9 months 28 days ago 
stink...... I have been waiting for another LOTR game. with so much u can do with the franchise how can u go so wrong? sumone needs to make a good LOTR team vs team game..with sum Hasharii lol. i lovee utterly love LOTR and im just pissed at disrespectful game developers trying to make a buck from creating a crap game and ruining the name of somthing so pure
fatcat275  - 9 months 23 days ago 
Was that an army of hobbits fighting the entirety of isengard and mordor i saw in the trailer?
Reubenguy  - 9 months 16 days ago 
well i have played this game now and can say that wat Gamesradar is saying is pretty much all true...but i still had a couple hours of fun with my friends backstabbing them as the scout or owning them with a troll, brilliant idea for a game bad dilivery. there are actually only 12 moves for each unit type but like i said Co-op or versus should be the reason you hire this.

I reckon if you were looking out for this game like i was you should hire it, that way u can enjoy the game and pass it back to the shop before realising all its crappy faults
Mavarious  - 8 months 26 days ago 
I got a 120gb HDD for my arcade and a year long subscription to Xbox Live. Tomorrow afternoon I'm getting Halo 3. Until then I've passed my time by playing the multiplayer on the demo version. It was the only battling multiplayer with a demo available for download.

It's fun when it's free and only online, but I would be mighty pissed if I dropped 60 bucks for it.
Mavarious  - 8 months 26 days ago 
^^^^^
the demo version of Conquest, not halo 3 lol.
Leafreader  - 4 months 27 days ago 
You know what I'm sick of? I'm sick of crap like this. And I don't mean the game.

Guys..... if you like the game, from playing the demo...... then get it. Don't sit here, and be swayed by some guy. Just because he hated it doesn't mean that everyone will.

I played the demo, and had a freaken blast. And I know that if and when I get the full, I will have a blast. I don't need some guy to tell me if a game is good or not. I judge by my standrards, not by someone elses.
rfry11  - 4 months 9 days ago 
Damn, and to think I already paid for this. Ah well, I'll still play it, seeing as I love SW: Battlefront, and Pandemic games in general, but they've really got to stop this streak of crappy games based off of awesome ideas.
Also, does theb Re-Captcha have to have the hardest to read font ever?! I mean seriously, couldn't they have just used regular Times New Roman?!
gooperz109  - 2 months 25 days ago 
I agree with Leafreader... i bought the game and, although the horses, trolls and ents suck ass, the rest of the game was awsome..

Remember dont just follow what everyone else says, try it out first...
bobzombi  - 1 month 25 days ago 
if u play this game co-op or verses it deserves at least a 6, its not that bad
This video player requires Flash 9 Player or later. Please download the latest Flash Player.
The Knowledge
Lord of the Rings: Conquest
Lord of the Rings: Conquest

Genre: Action
Release date: Jan 13, 2009
Published by: Electronic Arts
Developed by: Pandemic Studios
Franchise: Lord of the Rings
Min system requirements: XP SP2, 2.4 GHz Core Duo processor, 1 GB RAM, 256 MB Video Card, DX 9.0c
Multiplayer Modes:
Online
4 player CO-OP
2 BROKEN
Read the review
Latest Articles About This Game
One ring to screw it all up
PC Review  -  Jan 15, 2009