Google+

Order of War review

Mediocre
Shares
AT A GLANCE
  • Huge scale battles
  • Authentic historical approach
  • Cool cinematic camera
  • Not an iota of personality
  • Dull, predictable mission design
  • Combat utterly devoid of strategy or tactics

Where are you hiding it Order of War? Where’s that nugget of novelty, that pinch of personality that sets you apart from the rest of the Company of Blitzkrieg set?

It’s certainly not in your two nine-mission campaigns. They’re as predictable as they come – dreary slogging matches with almost no room for tactical experimentation. Something is badly wrong in a WWII RTS when you find yourself counting your teeth with your tongue during an Omaha Beach assault, or fabricating an origami frog while the Screaming Eagles storm Sainte-Mere-Eglise.

The scenario designers can’t shoulder all the blame. The folk that devised the combat mechanics also deserve Panzerfaust enemas. Despite a plump unit roster, incorporating everything from Tigers and Nebelwerfers to Sherman Calliopes and P-47s, Order of War’s warfare is deathly dull. There are no clear rock-paper-scissors relationships here, no role for cover, fog-of-war, morale, or veterancy. Nothing encourages you to employ anything but the crudest swarm tactics.

You might hope the game redeems itself in Skirmish or multiplayer? Nope. While both modes are a relief after the constrictions of the campaigns, neither provides enough variety or surprises to be serious long-term propositions. Why a studio with such a solid turn-based track-record (Massive Assault) would want to venture into a genre as well-trodden as this one is a mystery. Order of War is irrefutable proof pretty Panzers are no longer enough.

Oct 6, 2009

More Info

Release date: Sep 22 2009 - PC (US)
Sep 22 2009 - PC (UK)
Available Platforms: PC
Genre: Strategy
Published by: Square Enix
Developed by: Wargaming.net
ESRB Rating:
Teen: Violence, Mild Language
PEGI Rating:
16+

We Recommend

3 comments

  • artgamer - October 12, 2009 7:17 a.m.

    Good game, actually, not many innovations but lots of fun. Def worth trying for every rts fan.
  • Rosbif - October 8, 2009 5:36 p.m.

    Seems to be getting various verdicts. Gamespot and IGN rated it 7 and 8 respectively.
  • TheGiaour - October 7, 2009 10:42 a.m.

    I'll stick with CoH. nuff said.

Showing 1-3 of 3 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

OR…

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.