Majesty 2 - The Fantasy Kingdom Sim

  • A different take on RTS
  • Strangely compulsive
  • A great idea
  • Doesn't give you enough control
  • Dumb AI frustrates
  • Just isn't very fun

If you’ve ever wondered who pays a hero 200 gold to walk 40 metres and kill a rat, there’s now a series of strategy games to answer that question. Majesty 2 is an RTS wherein you have no direct control over any units. All you can do is offer gold for the completion of objectives, and hope some nearby hero is short on cash and in the mood for a quest. It’s bizarre. But it’s fascinating, so it takes a long time to realise you’re having very little fun. It’s such a novel, obtuse challenge, to defend a kingdom and vanquish evil using only a form of batshit capitalism, that it’s initially sort of compulsive.

Your heroes will kill what’s in front of them for free, and gain experience for doing so. But once you’ve given them a market to buy health potions from, an inn to rest up at, and a guild to go home to, it’s an expensive and unreliable process to persuade them to destroy that bear den 50 metres down the road. Your economy scales up quickly, so soon that you'll have thousands of gold to waste greasing the palms of your self-important twats, but even ridiculous bounties only inspire one or two parties to wander over in their own time and get slaughtered by superior numbers.

Case in point: the Elf Bungalow is under attack. This is where our elf heroes come from, where they live and the source of their power. We are offering 500 gold for someone, anyone to defend it. Our ten heroes are mostly trundling around town dealing with the minor but constant influx of threats from the city sewers, but there’s a high-level elf inside the building. Finally he feels up to leaving, walks past the attacking monsters, and treks halfway across the map to investigate an ‘explore’ quest we set up at the start of the game. There’s a crash as his home and livelihood collapses, and another as our head hits the keys.

A hero management game is a lovely idea, and the level of simulation here is rich. Watching simulated RPG protagonists kill things, level up, take your money, and spend it in your shops is a Machiavellian pleasure – a little like being Blizzard for a day. And indirectly controlling them with cash incentives is a fun way to interact with that system.

The problem isn’t any of that stuff; it’s that the game tries to use those principles as the control method for a very standard RTS. You create these heroes from your own guilds like standard RTS units, so it seems absurd that you’re not in charge of them. The game throws massive, immediate threats at you throughout, so it seems absurd that your heroes take so long to respond. And your objectives are for their protection as much as yours, so it seems absurd that you have to bribe them to fight. For the kind of game they’ve tried to make, this convoluted command structure is completely pointless.

Oct 8, 2009

More Info

Release date: Sep 18 2009 - PC (US)
Sep 18 2009 - PC (UK)
Available Platforms: PC
Genre: Strategy
Published by: Paradox Interactive
Developed by: 1C, Paradox Interactive
ESRB Rating:
Teen: Alcohol Reference, Fantasy Violence, Mild Blood
PEGI Rating:
Rating Pending

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000
  • Evergod41 - May 5, 2010 2:27 a.m.

    I completely dissagree with those negatives, it is a very fun and challenging game, yes you have no direct control, and yes within minutes your palace *WILL* be swarmed with at least 3 ogres and armies of undead, or some enemy heroes that level off of your peasant homes, being that they are instantly repaired by its inhabitants. Compared to the first, it only lacks the freeplay option, after completeing an impossible mission your shooed off to the next instead of leveling your lord, which is a new feature and comes in handy for the large fights, and the single missions arn't as dynamically random as in the first, where you could start with only your palace, 1500 gold, and win against a swarm of vampires. i know it may seem that i am dissing this game but i am not, it is an extreeme challenge, and i wont deny that i cant beat a few of the areas, but there are revolutionary ideas that havent been expressed since the first majesty, and so i will end that this game is at least worth a try, i promise you will have fun for the first few levels.
  • MagicalSarai - October 14, 2009 2:35 p.m.

    I wish their review would have at least compared the two majesties together... cause I STILL play the first one every now and then. It's good fun...
  • Centros - October 10, 2009 12:51 p.m.

    I was so impressed with the first Majesty that I thought this one would have been multitudes better, not worse...oh well.