• aberkromby - February 20, 2012 9:52 a.m.

    They needed to quit the Mario crap 5 years ago. I no longer have any respect for Nintendo anymore, because of their utter lack of creativity. Seriously, they've been milking the same characters for thirty straight years. Enough already.
  • EnragedTortoise1 - February 20, 2012 10:11 a.m.

    Finish Paper Mario and then give us some Metroid or something, for god's sake. Other M doesn't count.
  • GameManiac - February 20, 2012 10:14 a.m.

    It wouldn't be right of Nintendo to just abandon him. Mario single-handedly brought back Nintendo of America from the brink of bankruptcy, and allowed them to bring their games here into the USA.
  • Person5 - February 20, 2012 10:20 a.m.

    While I think Mario has indeed run his course, I don't think Nintendo should stop playing Mario games, I'm still a sucker for a good platformer, and Mario games are usually the only ones out there, Rayman Origins helped for a time though
  • MCN2011 - February 20, 2012 10:26 a.m.

    Nintendo's Mario games continue to feature some of the most creative and original gameplay in the world, and continue to be highly acclaimed by both reviewers and gamers alike. Unfortunately, some retards can't see past the fact that they have the same lead character. Luckily, nobody actually listens to these people.
  • ACGUY - February 20, 2012 10:27 a.m.

    I want a Mario Game for every new console! And an F-Zero too Nintendo..... Also Star Fox.... Oh don't forget Earthbound!
  • Darkwun - February 20, 2012 10:34 a.m.

    Though Mario evolves with each iteration and they are the pnnacle of platforming, with the forced black and white voting.... i voted yes. Simply because I want to see what else Nintendo can do. The Mario games are great-they're not for me, I've gone off platforming since the N64 days, but Nintendo just doing something different would just shake things up. I'm obsessive compulsive so I know about sticking to routines, but I know for the people around me it's a pain in the arse. We wait ages for a new Zelda, I don't mind waiting for a new Mario inbetween a brand new novel franchise that tests Nintendo's imagination in new ways.
  • CitizenWolfie - February 20, 2012 10:52 a.m.

    Spin-offs aside, it's not like Mario games are being released once a year like FIFA, Madden or the FPS that everyone loves to hate. It's really only Galaxy 2 that came out (relatively) shortly after its predecessor. I mean, it took Sunshine 8 years to be the next "true" game after Mario 64! However, I'd say it IS time for a break. If anything I'd say Nintendo have actually made raised the bar so high with previous games that further Mario games (I personally include both Galaxies in this) have been sidesteps instead of being revolutionary. But even then I'd say it's more because gaming itself hasn't really evolved beyond better graphics. Sure, the Wii tried something different, and only Skyward Sword has really shown the Wii's potential, but Mario is the sort of game that doesn't benefit from motion control. Super Mario 3DS has been about the biggest improvement I've seen since Mario 64 in terms of the series as a whole, purely because it utilised the 3D aspect so well. So yes, perhaps Mario should take a break, at least wait until gaming changes significantly enough. Because Mario is at its best when it innovates and kickstarts a new generation.
  • CitizenWolfie - February 20, 2012 10:54 a.m.

    "Made raised" should read "raised" *facepalm
  • talleyXIV - February 20, 2012 3:51 p.m.

    Super Mario Sunshine came out 6 years after Super Mario 64.
  • CitizenWolfie - February 21, 2012 3:51 a.m.

    Oooh I love it when you talk timeframes. For some reason I had my fail hat on and counted the difference between '96 and '02 wrong. *double facepalm*
  • jiodjflak - February 20, 2012 10:53 a.m.

    I honestly think that Nintendo needs to give Mario a break. They need to focus on the games that they havent even mentioned in a while like F-Zero or Metroid.
  • higgins78 - February 20, 2012 11:07 a.m.

    Ive always been of the school of thought which likes Nintendo to focus quality over quantity, the Zelda franchise being a perfect example. When I think of Zelda I think of it in terms of generations, one game every generation will always suit me as long as the quality shines bright. Nintendo - for me - offer the same experience with a new Mario title, as in it can pump out as many Mario Parties and Mario Karts as it likes, just so long as when a traditional Mario is released it is the quality we have been spoiled with over many generations. For the NES think Super Mario Bros 1 & 3, 2 is iffy but still good. The SNES is Super Mario Bros, N64 is Mario 64, Gamecube is Mario Sunshine...bit of a miss there for me. Mario Sunshine I guess is the reason this gen we have has TWO classic Mario's, both Super Mario Galaxy 1 & 2. Please Nintendo, don't change!
  • ncurry2 - February 20, 2012 11:11 a.m.

    Lol. This is funny. There's only a handful of actual Mario titles for each console and they are always system defining games. Most earn perfect scores and Game of the Year awards from numerous sources. They are always among the best selling games for the system. They always push the technology and expand on the franchise's solid history. Lets recap: they continue to garner some of the highest critical acclaim, sell the most, and push the hardware and creative direction fronts. And we see a proper one released once every 3-4 years or so on average. If anything, we should see more Mario games. As for games tied to Mario (Mario Party, Mario Sports), I don't see what the harm is. They could introduce new characters and settings but why do that when they already have a stellar and instantly recognizable cast to pull from? Regardless of what you think, rest assured Nintendo won't be giving Mario a break any time soon. I see no reason why they should.
  • Imgema - February 20, 2012 11:22 a.m.

    Mario is still doing fine. Sonic on the other hand should have been euthanized a decade ago.
  • metalgatesolid - February 20, 2012 12:32 p.m.

    People are in arms about Sackboy Kart (Please dont call it that Sony) because Mario has hogged all the limelight and made too many games. Sonic Tried to get into Marios teritory with Sonic Racers (which was good) and that is "just a Mario Kart clone". I know Mario is an icon, more so than most real people, but one day if they keep pushing his name on titles one will be a massive dud. Sonic was considered marios nearest rival and look at how sonics reputation plummeted after a few duds. Mario doesnt deserve that.
  • reach110 - February 20, 2012 12:40 p.m.

    Ninty just needs to find a healthy balance. It seems like whenever they want to sell a game that isn't a guaranteed hit, they slap Mario on it and call it gold. We've seen that Nintendo has the capacity to create deep, rich worlds with characters everyone loves. I think Nintendo is too scared to take a lot of risks, opting to just try out new ideas within the safe zone of their established roster. Let's move away from Pokemon, Link and Mario and try to come up with something new! Add to the universe you've created! If there's no danger of them going under anytime soon, I don't see why Nintendo is so hesitant to create a new first-party experience that's unlike anything we've seen. Of COURSE there's going to be some failures, but I'd love to see Nintendo come up with a new franchise that ends up being successful and popular without anyone from the back catalog to carry it. And at the same time, let's show a little more love to the franchises that haven't seen nearly as much limelight as the plumber? More F-Zero! More Kirby! Other M may have been a much-maligned installment, but it was a risk that needed to be taken for Metroid. It piqued my interest because it was a huge change for the series, not just another 3d platformer with a different control scheme or gameplay mechanic. It seems to me like the people making these games aren't having fun anymore, they're just doing it because it's a job now. And it's not just Nintendo, it's EVERYBODY. I hate how a property becomes big and then it's just assumed we need more and more and more. From here on out, it's safe to assume we can see either a Halo, COD or Gears game per year, simply because they've become money-printing franchises. Then fantastic games with less polish like Alan Wake, Prototype and Enslaved fall through the cracks because we're convinced the heavy hitters will just be better. Meanwhile, the big franchise titles slowly dip in quality and fun every time we buy them. Look at how fast Guitar Hero and Rock band were killed once they reached their "peak." Can you imagine what it would be like if Valve pumped out a Half-Life game every two years? Or if there were a new Elder Scrolls every year? The point is, if you've got gold, don't make it so available it's not rare anymore. It may glitter, but if it's everywhere you look it's not as sought-after. Good Lord, I just wrote a novel.
  • talleyXIV - February 20, 2012 3:49 p.m.

    I didn't read that only because you called them "Ninty." I shudder every time I read that nickname.
  • reach110 - March 16, 2012 4:08 p.m.

    I'm really desperately horribly sorry. No really.
  • losthero15 - February 20, 2012 12:47 p.m.

    Mario 3d land and mario kart 7 are huge parts of why the 3ds was able to pull out of its slump. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

Showing 21-40 of 75 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000


Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.