Does a perfect score mean a perfect game?
We ask a selection of magazine editors their opinion
Ross Atherton | Editor | PC Gamer (UK)
GR: Does a perfect score equal a perfect game?
Ross: That's a difficult one, because obviously we give percentage scores. The highest score we've ever given anything is 96% and there's a reason we don't do 10s. I think were we a magazine that gave scores out of 10, then no - a 10 out of 10 doesn't equal a perfect game. I think people get hung up on review scores generally and a score is just a signifier to tell you how good a game is compared to other things out there and what kind of experience you're going to get from it. Everyone's experience of a game differs slightly. And no, a 10 doesn't equal a perfect game.
GR: So what's the difference between 96% and 100%?
Ross: That's a good question given that we've never seen a 100% game. Every game has something wrong with it, even great games like BioShock, Half-Life 2 or Team Fortress 2 - all games we've given really high scores to. If a game were to ever come along without those minor niggles, those little flaws, then that would be a 99% or 100% game.
GR: 100% then, in your opinion, would indicate an absolutely flawless game?
Ross: Yeah. In theory it could exist, but nothing's come close in the history of games that I know of. That's not to say there aren't utterly fantastic games which in many ways you could deem to be perfect, but I think it's our job as reviewers to find those little flaws and just to tell people that while the majority of the game is excellent, you might find this bit a little annoying.
Above: Half-Life 2 (pictured), BioShock and Deus Ex have all scored highly in PC Gamer. Nothing has ever received 100%, though
GR: Do you think it's harder to give 100% than a 10?
Ross: I can't conceive of ever doing it. In the industry, as we've come to know it over the last 20 years, it's hard enough to make a really good game. Every game has a flaw or design choice that we disagree with. I'd love to be proved wrong. I'd love to give a game 100%, but it's really hard to see it happening.
GR: Do you think 10s are dished out a bit too readily?
Ross: No I don't. If your system is out of 10, anything that is 95% plus, yeah, that's worth a 10. I think as long as you're not doing that every month...
GR: Can you give us an example of a game that has come close to 100% perfection by PC Gamer's standards?
Ross: Half-Life 2 is a really good example of a game that is almost perfect. The last couple of levels in the Citadel are a little bit grey, a little bit mechanical. Not a great ending to the game, so I think it's important that we're able to distinguish between a game that is perfect and a game that is approaching perfection. And Half-Life 2 is 96% as far as we're concerned. It came close to 97%, by the way. So did the original Half-Life, but not quite there. And I like that we're allowed to make those distinctions given our scoring system. But that's not to say anything against the 10 out of 10 system - that works for some mags and that's fine.
Sign up to the GamesRadar+ Newsletter
Weekly digests, tales from the communities you love, and more
After shutting down its American operations, veteran Japanese studio behind beloved JRPGs launches cult action RPG in English to zero buzz and confused fans
I wish Stellar Blade's New Game+ was added before my first playthrough, because it sounds like a whole new action RPG with 34 new outfits and a bigger skill tree