• TheGuy0526 - February 12, 2012 6:59 p.m.

    wow, valve is pulling a serious bitch move. I hope Blizzard shuts them down.
  • Fiirestorm21 - February 10, 2012 8:01 p.m.

    I don't see how Valve legally is in the wrong here. I don't necessarily support it, but Blizzard has no claim to it, nor is there any particular legal reason why Valve shouldn't have it. It's like the Bethesda/Interplay deal with Fallout, except with the stand-in for Interplay not even having any claim to begin with. Not a great conclusion, but a fair one nonetheless.
  • DF344 - February 10, 2012 5:32 p.m.

    Now I'm no legal expert, but I think that kinda covers it... Otherwise who here is a lawyer?
  • DF344 - February 10, 2012 5:30 p.m.
  • Blasto - February 10, 2012 12:23 p.m.

    I think Blizzard is in the right here. Valve simply has no right to use the name "Dota" Also, Icefrog didn't make DotA.
  • IChooseUAntistaMON - February 10, 2012 11:32 a.m.

    The weird thing is that all four of these companies are beloved by the fans. If you look at the "March Mayhem" bracket on the escapist 3 of the four companies made it to the final four and bethesda fell just one round short, making it to the elite 8
  • gamegod19 - February 10, 2012 11:03 a.m.

    While I don't think Blizzard can do much about it I do agree it is kind of messed up for another company to take that name it would be like blizzard making a Counter Strike game.
  • Asmodean - February 10, 2012 11:25 a.m.

    counter strike is a TM game and name, DOTA is not, sorry but Blizzard only started to care when they noticed money being made, now they are crying foul. They Should shut their Activision owned pie holes and get back to work on Diablo 3 or Heart of the Swarm.
  • mariostyle - February 10, 2012 1:43 p.m.

    Nope. Counter-strike started out as a mod of Half-Life.
  • Asmodean - February 10, 2012 2:49 p.m.

    Ahh yes but it has been TM now after valve employed the moders
  • Grumzkar - February 10, 2012 11:21 p.m.

    Asmodean, were you not balefired?
  • chrisq823 - February 11, 2012 4:36 p.m.

    grunzkar thats awesome love me some wot
  • LackingLadyLover - February 10, 2012 10:48 a.m.

    Blizzard's in the wrong here. If anything, the term DOTA belongs to the mod's creators, who now work for Valve, and as such Valve has the better claim.
  • TheRandomFool - February 10, 2012 10:41 a.m.

    They really ought to just chill. Valve has a good game being made; why not do it like other companies did with COD? They are obviously making different iterations of the same theme, so why worry about it - both are free anyway!
  • Karenthian - February 10, 2012 10:55 a.m.

    Yeah, I think you've hit the nail on the head here. It's the original creators choice, if he works for someone then one can assume he chose them.
  • ncurry2 - February 10, 2012 10:33 a.m.

    I think Blizzard will probably be legally in the right. I don't care either way since I have LoL so why would I even bother with the others?
  • Van - February 19, 2012 7:56 a.m.

    Blizzard is trying to look like the good guy here but frankly, Valve has a much better case to put forward. Blizzard claims that "Dota" belongs to the community and then they go ahead and say they have provided the developers with several years of "goodwill". Is that the best they can come up with? Seriously? Just because they have an EULA doesn't mean jack all. This won't hold up in court. Dota has never been a community trademark. The guy who created it originally (Eul) and the guy who's been passionately devoting his time to updating and maintaining the game for several years are both employed at Valve. Blizzard are just butt hurt, that is all.
  • Van - February 19, 2012 7:57 a.m.

    If you like LoL, good for you. But it is of a much lower quality than Dota 2.
  • Asmodean - February 10, 2012 10:27 a.m.

    I don't see Blizzard wining this, DOTA was never a trade marked and is a community creation. That Valve is now trying to copyright the name as 'DOTA2'makes sense. I fear though this will hurt the community, if Blizzard looses they'll just change their EULA to state that all community made mods are the property of Blizzard. This will in turn push fans away, the better answer should have been Blizzard buying the rights once the mod was popular. It just seems they are crying foul that Valve got there first.
  • AngryToadstool - February 10, 2012 4:51 p.m.

    i know you may be confused about this...but Blizzard isn't trying to stake claim to the name, they're just trying to prevent Valve from having exclusive rights to a name that Valve didn't create. It doesn't matter that Valve hired some of the people that helped create the custom game in the first place, it's not something Valve came up with, so it shouldn't be exclusively owned by them.

Showing 1-20 of 30 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000


Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.