Blackguards review

  • Solid mechanics and varied scenarios
  • Rich fantasy setting
  • Clumsy, imprecise UI
  • More bugs than you’d like
  • Loading screens. Loading screens everywhere

You’ve probably never heard of The Dark Eye. It’s not really your fault--that particular tabletop RPG isn’t meant for you. It was made by Germans for other Germans, and it found a lot of success by focusing on that particular niche. But you may have heard of Blackguards, Daedalic Entertainment’s turn-based tactics game set in The Dark Eye’s universe. And much like its parent, Blackguards is designed for a specific audience, and diehard strategy fans will get a lot of value out of Blackguards’ lengthy, varied campaign. It’s just a shame that a few nagging bugs and design choices keep the rest of us from enjoying it, too.

At its core, Blackguards is a turn-based tactical RPG. Battles occur in rounds, wherein your party and their adversaries jockey for the chance to slice, stab, and burn each other into oblivion. Each character in your party has their own role, and the interactions between character types create fascinating strategic challenges. Do you move your wounded spearman to attack an enemy, even though it blocks your archer’s line of fire? Do you spend you mage’s limited mana to deal damage to one enemy, or to debuff the entire enemy party? Answering these questions properly will be the difference between life and death for your party.

That’s what you’d like to think, anyway. In reality, your expert plans are foiled by the lousy user interface. The minimalist screen overlay shows a series of portraits and health bars but no commands, which are assigned from a right-click menu. The unintuitive menu system means you’ll end up with a lot of unintentional movements or mistargeted spells--I lost count of the number of times my healer healed herself rather than the character who actually needed it. In a game where proper strategic planning is so vital, these mistakes can--and will--force you to restart levels. Diehard fans of the tactics genre can struggle through, but it gets annoying very quickly.

Taken individually, these turn-based skirmishes are fun enough (when the UI isn’t ruining it), but Daedalic works hard to ensure that the formula never grows old. Whether you’re traversing a booby-trapped warehouse or dropping an immense iron cage on a rampaging gorilla, most battles have a unique twist to them. It’s these wrinkles that keep the core gameplay fresh for Blackguard’s surprisingly long campaign.

The length actually works against Blackguards after a while. Once you get settled into the core gameplay, you’ll start to notice the cracks in the shell surrounding it. Travelling involves little more than clicking a spot on the world map, and once you arrive at your destination you’ll find little to do there. You can try having a conversation with the locals, but the limited dialogue options eliminate any sense of role-play. The inventory is a byzantine mess with no way to sort or filter to find the items you want, and the journal only rarely gives you the information you need. What’s worse is the number of bugs. The “Head” and “Feet” armor icons are reversed on the inventory screen. The in-game rulebook doesn’t work. Some dialogue options are still shown in Daedalic’s native German. Like the problems with the UI, none of these are game-breaking, but they do nag at you whenever you see them, and you see them pretty often.

As annoying as the bugs are, its the loading screens that will grind you down. Viewing the world map? Loading screen. Entering battle? Loading screen. Leaving battle? Loading screen. They are everywhere. You can not escape them. You will see the same five images and read the same five “tips” so many times that they will be marked indelibly into your mind. You will carry them for all of your days and in your dying moments your final words shall be “Remember, quicksave often! (F5 to save, F9 to load).” Which is funny, because you can’t actually quicksave during the battles--once you start a fight you have to see it through to the end or start the whole thing over.

Daedalic’s artists clearly tried to imbue Blackguards with their own Ottoman-inspired aesthetic, but the nice visual style can’t cover up the lackluster gameplay. The (seemingly) hand-drawn world map is beautiful, but cities and towns are little better than the lightly animated landscapes of a point-and-click adventure game. Once you get into battle, Daedalic’s stylized intentions are disappointed by technical limitations--models are ugly and all wear the same vacant faces, even when talking. Everything--and I do mean everything--is shown under a depth-of-field filter that leaves most of your screen blurry and out-of-focus. Battle effects and animations are nice enough, but Blackguard had trouble keeping the frame rate up when things got busy.

Blackguard had a lot of promise--The Dark Eye provides an interesting setting and a compelling set of tactical mechanics for a turn-based strategy game. And if you’re looking at just the combat, Blackguards works--it’s just a shame that everything is so unpolished. You’ll find incomplete translations; an awkward, imprecise control scheme; and frame rate issues, all of which keep Blackguards from realizing its potential.

More Info

Release date: Jan 22 2014 - PC (US)
Available Platforms: PC
Genre: Role Playing
Published by: Daedalic Entertainment
Developed by: Daedalic Entertainment

Blackguards is enjoyable enough for diehard strategy fans, but nagging bugs and a poor UI keep it from its full potential.


  • SKull - October 28, 2014 1:09 a.m.

    I`ll agree regarding the damn loading screens, although it`s funny what you can get used to. Other than that I thought Blackguards was a nice experience, with good dialogue, a nice story, pretty interesting characters and some good game play. In fact some of the game play is excellent and most battles and battlegrounds, of which there are a lot, feel as if they`ve had some work put into them. The odds are a bit stacked against you at times, and it`d be nice with an option to adjust formations so your casters don`t end up taking two melee hits in the first round before you can move them to safety. But all in all most of the battles are just hard enough to feel satisfying to beat, or harder, and only a few of them had me cursing out loud. The one thing that really drove me up the wall though was the constant missing in combat. This brand of /swush RPGs should have gone out of fashion with Baldur`s Gate. It was already quite annoying there, but at least you more or less stopped missing as you leveled up in Baldur`s Gate. In Blackguards you`ll swush your way all the way to the end, and be reloading maps endlessly until you get some luck with the rolls. It`s just the wrong way to make a video game challenging, even though it works better for table top games. If you`re like me though and wish there`d be more tactical combat RPGs, and you think 90% of all games being released are laughably easy, then you will probably enjoy Blackguards a lot anyway. And having played Banner Saga I have no hesitation recommending Blackguards instead of that game, which was awfully linear and had the dullest combat I can remember in a tactical combat game. It had some other strong points of course, and Blackguards is a bit rougher round the edges in some respects. But as a game it`s far superior anyway. As for the frame rate I don`t know what kind of a PC you have there. You`d think a game reviewer would replace his goat driven 1980s Albanian PC with something a bit more current, for professional purposes if nothing else. My machine is from 2009 and is not exactly state of the art, and there was a single fight in the entire game where I got some frame rate issues, even while playing at max settings. And in that fight the entire combat area was animating with some sort of poison. Shape up man, and don`t hold it against a game when you don`t upgrade your hardware at least once a decade. PS: Oh and I found one single line of dialogue in the entire game which was in German instead of English, so it`s hardly as if this is a massive issue either. If this one line is so dang important, you can just write it down on a piece of paper, tab out and google all the words before translating it yourself in about 25 seconds. Hell, you might accidentally learn some German words!
  • Gankatron - January 28, 2014 12:49 p.m.

    A minutia based review. Combat scenarios are creative, the story interesting, and the dialogue as funny as the old BioWare games. The UA is fine and presents everything one needs, and more information is displayed if one invests in the talent “Warcraft”. You are best advised to go to an overhead POV when targeting, which is far from difficult to achieve, just scroll the mouse wheel. The only infrequent targeting issue I had was with oversized mob who would sway at the last moment under my cursor as I was clicking on another object. Sounds like the reviewer needs a SSD and new video cards as I have no idea what frame rate issues he is talking about and while there are plentiful loading screens they lasted me ~4-5 seconds, a very first world dilemma indeed. The game is about tactical combat and not journeying between battle destinations and cities so I appreciated the rapid transit times; I will guess if the party moved slowly and actual distance was calculated into travel time a converse criticism would be raised concerning tedious travel times. The cities are just spring boards for resupply, rest, and to further the story; I don’t see the problem as they fulfill their purpose between the tactical battles which makes up the heart of the game. As far as bugs, it is just out of beta, and as an indie game I give them a bit of slack, especially in translating German to English, certainly nothing a patch or two would fix; in the meantime as a work-around to the critical feet/head “bug” I suggest putting boots on the character’s feet, and not on their head even if they mistakenly titled the slots (although I didn’t notice this). In any case stating “More bugs than you’d like” is absolutely misleading as it can lead people to believe it is a buggy mess; the “bugs” you are referring to are things like mistranslations as opposed to crashes and broken combat. The main problem I had was with the stated odds of actions to succeed, which seemed to clearly be ballpark at best. Clearly they don’t want you to save during combat, that is intentional, and this is why they advise players to save often, such as before entering new situations; is hitting the F5 key really so taxing that it is brought out as a negative feature in a review? This is a far too critical review of this very entertaining tactical RPG. …mediocre? Nope, great fun if this genre is one’s thing.
  • winner2 - January 27, 2014 3:53 p.m.

    Well that's a shame, but at least this saved me a waste of money

Showing 1-3 of 3 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000