Lord of the Rings: Conquest Discussion


  • matt92 - February 22, 2011 10:40 a.m.

    THIS GAME IS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!111 i'd give it a ten :D
  • Afrolad - January 29, 2009 8:12 a.m.

    Hey Pandemic, You guys just had TOO high hopes for this game if you had of just thought it was some average game you would have written a different report. i cant wait to play it and i dont care what you guy say. And another thing PS3 has a different quallity to PS2 and PS1 so it would have been harder to meet the Playstation sepecifications.
  • chuck17j17j - April 10, 2009 10:56 p.m.

    Awsome Game. I dont care what u say its good.
  • Brent71 - March 5, 2009 1:19 a.m.

    Yeah i thought that was wrong and off i mean people enjoy playing tese games i know did cause im used 2 playing the sequels and all have been fun atleast so i have ta give it a 5
  • battenfelder - January 21, 2009 2:42 a.m.

    really? a 2?!? i played this game yesterday and i though it would deserve at least a 7 or 8, but a 2? sorry GR but you will have to give me a better reason than 'Wormtounge is a badass' or ' they go really fast backwards'. i have to agree that th horses are useless. plus it doesn't matter if the story is wrong the game was made for multiplayer. anyon who likes star wars Battlefront will enjoy this game.

Showing 1-5 of 5 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

More Info

Release date: Jan 13 2009 - PS3, PC, Xbox 360 (US)
Jan 16 2009 - PS3, PC, Xbox 360 (UK)
Available Platforms: PS3, PC, Xbox 360
Genre: Action
Published by: Electronic Arts
Developed by: Pandemic Studios
Franchise: Lord of the Rings
ESRB Rating:
PEGI Rating:


Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.