Why Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is one of the greatest games ever made

And all of that is only the single-player; we haven’t even got into the impact that the groundbreaking multiplayer has had on the series, and even the industry at large. It’s hard to find a modern shooter that doesn’t follow the Modern Warfare multiplayer formula. Player progression, perks, and challenges changed the way we play online shooters, and made the competitive game modes even more addictive in the process. 

The multiplayer system felt different than any other in the genre. It was brilliantly balanced, players could customize their characters, and the constant rewards sucked you in, match after match. Newcomers and low-level players aren’t left at a significant disadvantage, because it only takes a few bullets to gun down even the most experienced players.  

The perks were the true game changers: Players could customize their multiplayer characters beyond simply choosing what weapon they were holding. Perks grant abilities like being able to hold additional equipment, reload faster, or be invisible to radar. With each kill you made or point you captured, challenges and accolades constantly popped up on the screen, which rewarded experience, weapons, attachments and perks. Even using your favorite loadouts and using them consistently earned you bonuses, giving you better perks as you complete specific challenges. 

If Modern Warfare did one thing right, it’s getting players addicted to its greatness. We loved the multiplayer so much that once we reached level cap, we’d Prestige--an option setting us back to square one. Only the basic weapons were available and we’d work our way back up to the cap. Then we’d do it again. And again. And all we got for our trouble was a special Prestige badge next to our names. We wouldn’t play a game with that kind of dedication if it wasn’t spotless. The controls are so smooth, the progression so addicting, and getting good enough to spit back some trash talk over the mic is oh-so satisfying. 

Even now, games in the genre are still trying to reach the impossibly high bar that Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare set--even those in the same series. Modern Warfare changed the face of the shooter genre with its innovative features, tight controls, engaging campaign, and revolutionary multiplayer. Let the haters hate--it definitely deserves its spot on our top 100 games of all time. 

"Why _____ is one of the best games ever made" is a weekly feature that goes through GamesRadar's list of the 100 best games of all time and highlights different titles, explaining why they're on the list, what makes them so amazing, and why we love them so much. 


Infinity Ward


  • YesConsiderably - September 30, 2012 8:06 a.m.

    I suppose you have to credit Infinity Ward for laying the groundwork for CoD4... but Treyarch's World at War was a more inventive game from all perspectives. The multiplayer maps were larger and more conducive to epic team objective battles, and it of course introduced the cooperative Zombies mode. Where it really blew CoD4 out of the water though, was in its single-player campaign. While CoD4's best moments were just rehashed ideas from prior Call of Duty games - Safehouse was a much less hectic Silo (CoD2) and Heat took a lot from The Mace (CoD3) - WaW introduced a lot of wholly unique scenarios and the way they incorporated vehicles into the levels was very impressive (the flame tanks on Relentless). Presentation-wise, it also walked all over CoD4. Sean Murray's score was exquisite, and the loading screens and game menus were similarly impressive. It also introduced the enemy spawn system that is currently in place. It's a good thing for the industry that IW folded. Treyarch will continue to take this franchise in exciting new directions and set ever-new heights for video game presentation in the process.
  • Clowns - September 14, 2012 9:15 p.m.

    Personally i Prefer Call of Duty 2 with the Original Call of Duty Coming in 2nd, and Cod 4 coming in with a Close Third. call me Crazy but i liked the Simplicity of the Pre-MW CoDs.
  • ChristopherDalley - September 14, 2012 1:08 a.m.

    For better or worse, it's the most influential of the past decade. Emphasis on the worse.
  • Russian Mob - September 13, 2012 10:49 p.m.

    Completely agree. And while MW2 was as good and in some aspects even better, I am shocked how the gaming community is praising MW3, which in my opinion had set the series back. I honestly think you can't even compare the last one to the fist two... Guys at Infinity Ward were definitely masters, entrepreneur and true hardcore gamers. Can't wait to see what the Respawn Entertaintment will bring to the table in next couple of ears! P.S. VVV *Newb below VVV ;)
  • Funkzillabot - September 13, 2012 5:09 p.m.

    Ugh....god. NO. No it is not. What it is, is tired, tired, tired, tired, tired....and has been holding back the Game Industry for years.
  • SpiritTemple - October 6, 2012 6:30 p.m.

    Lol, you mad bro?
  • xxdismalfirexx - September 13, 2012 5:06 p.m.

    When I read the title I thought this was a parody article... but it's not.
  • tyler_14_420 - September 13, 2012 11:11 a.m.

    I think this one had the most thoughtful design put in, rather than just shock effect with EXPLOSIONS AND VEHICLES BAM ZOOM. The multiplayer was excellent. Martyrdom was annoying but it prevented the rampant knife lunges from MW2/3. Weapons seemed fair, and levels didn't really provide a significant benefit, as the most popular guns were usually obtainable extremely early. It was all around excellent, and original. Call of Duty is now like Megaman 1-7, sure, they can be pretty fun, but it's just a re-hash. Then, Megaman X. OMG SO GOOD WITH GRAPHICKS AND DASHING AND WALL-JUMPING WOW ITS LIKE A NEW GAME Where Call of Duty will probaly be like "WE ADDED UH... MORE TYPES OF GUNS!"
  • Pruman - September 13, 2012 11:07 a.m.

    I loved this game and World at War. Then MW2 came along and mucked it up with its ludicrous, nonsensical, worse-than-Michael Bay story. After playing through that one I had zero interest left in the series. This one at least could plausibly happen in real life.
  • monk_on_the_run - September 13, 2012 2:07 p.m.

    Almost completely agree, i didn't mind mw2 but it was the quickscoping and the obsession of people trying to 720 wallbang that killed it for me. COD4 will be one of my favourite games forever
  • interasteral7 - September 19, 2012 5:27 p.m.

    In my opinion, I agree with you for World at War, even though it was not better than Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and the previous entries before it. I usually say Call of Duty entries after Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare are least improved, but World at War was a less worse entry than the Call of Duty entries after it. It was better than the Call of Duty entries after, because it took a break from the Modern War Era and back to the World War 2 Era.
  • gazzc - September 13, 2012 10:15 a.m.

    I think you will find BF2 was first with a progression system a good 2 or so years earlier. That aside, the first Modern Warfare game was amazing at the time. The graphics blew me away and the action was non stop, the multiplayer was always a good bit of fun and something I spent many hours in. However its popularity is its curse, it became all too easy to repeat the exact same formula with the same engine, add a few minor tweaks here and there and still have everybody rush out and buy it based on nothing but the name. Of course the newer games are no worse than the first but for me the formula grew stale some time ago.
  • AuthorityFigure - September 13, 2012 5:05 a.m.

    Heaps of people maintain that this game is one of the best ever made already. I know intellectually that is a great game, but it doesn't get my imagination fired up much at all.
  • jewcats - September 13, 2012 1:06 a.m.

    "Don't be a fanboy" says the guy who thinks MW3 is the best game ever and whose avatar is a picture of Steve Jobs holding an iPad. That is beautiful.
  • LewisR - September 13, 2012 1:05 a.m.

    MW story, fantastic, speaks for itself but I don't think the balance achieved on multiplayer has been met since (by the series). There was no single gun that was always favoured. Some would be easily accessible, others had finer points that needed skil to take advantage of. As a newbie I hated the first sniper, prefering the rapid but weak semi-auto but several prestiges later it turned out to be one of the best. Also the spawing created a fantastic eb and flow in matches that played out in fantastically created maps which really did allow for a range of tactics. Nowadays the choice of games is greater, there is less chance of pulling together a group of friends onto COD to play a game of Search & Destroy and instead you get stuck with Johnny the one man team or "That trash talking 12 year old" from Texas. Lots of people have their own memoirs, these are just some of reasons I still get COD4 nostalgia trips.
  • tehtimeisnow - September 12, 2012 8:43 p.m.

    u guys got that rite it defenatly is one of the best game of all time cuz its near perfect ganeplay and grafics but i think it just got more beter with each sequel thats y i belief that modern warefare 3 is the best game of all time its just amazeing its super realistic and the grafics r some of the best of any game ever and the online play is perfact
  • mikeylawson - September 13, 2012 1:50 a.m.

    Obvious troll is obvious.
  • lazer59882 - September 12, 2012 8:10 p.m.

    i feel like tehtimeisnow is somehow behind this article...
  • lazer59882 - September 12, 2012 8:09 p.m.

  • TheTrooper424 - September 12, 2012 8:03 p.m.

    Of all the articles I've read I couldn't agree with this one more. Such an amazing game and I have so many memories with it. They could have never made a sequel after that and I'd still be the happiest guy alive. You can't recreate perfection haha

Showing 1-20 of 57 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000