Google+

Everything we know about the PS4 after E3

Sony pulls back the curtain on its next-generation console

Words: 19 hours, 16 minutes ago
Back to Article

95 comments

  • maverick-hunter - April 23, 2013 1:43 p.m.

    I do think Sony have allowed Microsoft the upper hand here by showing their hand a little too quickly... Cant wait to find out what the new Xbox has in store for us!

  • BladedFalcon - May 24, 2013 4:06 p.m.

    Hindsight makes this comment hilarious.

  • Lemons - May 25, 2013 9:10 p.m.

    Hilarious is an understatement.

  • FinderKeeper - February 23, 2013 8:54 a.m.

    I'm not an early adopter. I prefer for the bugs (and there will be bugs) to be ironed out, and for the price to settle to something reasonable. That usually means at least 2-3 years after launch (and in the case of the PS3, 5 years). Since that is typically around the time that online support for the previous generation ends, I'll enjoy the games I've already bought for the PS3 and PSN. Even though I understand why it won't have backward compatibility, it still pisses me off. Makes me angry enough to shoot a friend in the face...

  • Impakt - February 22, 2013 12:42 p.m.

    Did anyone took the time to read the whole developers list? i just saw it and skipped it

  • zombi3grim - February 24, 2013 5:38 p.m.

    I read it.

  • PatHan-bHai - February 25, 2013 8:54 a.m.

    meh, skipped

  • Darkhawk - February 22, 2013 9:17 a.m.

    WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH LAST GUARDIAN oops sorry capslock :)

  • cassidy-calagos - February 22, 2013 2:58 a.m.

    I think the PS4's UI's more like of Steam's Big Picture.

  • clownferret - February 22, 2013 2:49 a.m.

    what does this do that the PS3 can't do? I can understand why Wii U was launched because the Wii was underpowered and the tablet controller creates a new dimension, but PS3 & 360 are already powerful enough so these launches don't seem required. It looks like we are expected to pay £400 for a new console that will play COD5 that looks a bit better than COD4.

  • BladedFalcon - February 23, 2013 8:15 a.m.

    what does this do that the PS3 can't do? Plenty. Instant load times, background downloads of both games AND updates, Potentially being able to stream every game that has touched a Sony console, instantly upload videos to the web, view or let others view or even help in your game. Not to mention that better specs means not jsut better visuals but better frame-rate and less bugs and potential shitfests like the Bayonetta or Skyrim ports. Is that not enough for you? (And seriously, if you think the PS3 and 360 are "powerful enough" you clearly have your head stuck in the ground when it comes to PC gaming, and even now, more and more new games are struggling to run smoothly on account to the shitty RAM memory both current systems have. So no, they are NOT powerful enough, at least, not for the future to come)

  • zombi3grim - February 24, 2013 6:19 p.m.

    I have a PC rig and all three current gen consoles. Honestly, the graphics are sharper but thats about it. Its pretty much the same experience. Maybe that wasnt true 20 years ago, but consoles have grown in leaps and bounds since then and they only continue to develope faster as more money is put into them.

  • BladedFalcon - February 24, 2013 7:55 p.m.

    Well, I wasn't referring to just graphical quality, although I am pretty sure that for a lot of games (example: Skyrim) the textures of objects are noticeably more detailed. And there's also the thing that in general, high end PCs run games with almost no loading times, and a much better more stable frame-rate. And keep in mind that is is from someone who is pretty much a Console gamer. I love my consoles, but I also know and acknowledge the power PCs have, which is why that even though I am perfectly content with the current gen consoles, and plan to keep with them for a couple more years, I also recognize and understand why more powerful machines are now wanted and asked for.

  • zombi3grim - February 24, 2013 9:23 p.m.

    I notice no difference in framerate and I know Im on the internet and you cant trust everything I say, but I do have a top of the line gaming rig. The graphics ARE better and yes, its noticable, but its not this huge drastic leap alot of PC elitists claim it to be. Coming from them, you would think its like comparing the PS1 to the PS3 and its more like comparing blue ray to dvd.

Showing 21-40 of 95 comments

Join the Discussion
Add a comment (HTML tags are not allowed.)
Characters remaining: 5000

Featured Content

Connect with GamesRadar

Connect with Facebook

Log in using Facebook to share comments, games, status update and other activity easily with your Facebook feed.