<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>















<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		
			
			<title>GamesRadar - The History Channel: Battle for the Pacific</title>
	    	<link>http://www.gamesradar.com/ps3/the-history-channel-battle-for-the-pacific/g-20080505164836338036</link>
	    	<description></description>
	    	<language>en</language>
	   	
		
			<item>
				
					
    				
    				
    					<title>Video Games: Behind the Fun - Netflix Instant Queue (Video)</title>
    				
    			
    			
					
				    
				    	<link>http://www.gamesradar.com/ps3/the-history-channel-battle-for-the-pacific/videos/g-20080505164836338036/v-2009010810304390058</link>
				    
				
				
				    
    				
				    
				    	<description>The History Channel name doesn&#039;t guarantee entertainment or education here. This bland shooter rips off Call of Duty and doesn&#039;t even manage to do it well. </description>
				    
				
				<category>video</category>
    			<pubDate>
    				
    					
    					
    					
    						
    						
    							
    							
    								Jan 8, 2009
    							
    						
    					
    				
    			</pubDate>    
    		</item>
		
			<item>
				
					
    				
    				
    					<title>The History Channel: Battle for the Pacific (Review)</title>
    				
    			
    			
					
				    
				    	<link>http://www.gamesradar.com/ps3/the-history-channel-battle-for-the-pacific/review/the-history-channel-battle-for-the-pacific/a-2008050517405921118165/g-20080505164836338036</link>
				    
				
				
				    
    				
						
					    
					    	<description>Developer Cauldron may have all the expertise of the History Channel backing them up, but is it any use when they clearly don&#039;t understand the evolution of their own medium? Historical accuracy notwithstanding, Battle for the Pacific stands as a laughable attempt to clone the formula of successful first-person shooters like Call of Duty. The core problem with this game is that it betrays its own claim to realism. The History Channel moniker doesn&#039;t mean much when you&#039;re mowing ...&lt;br/&gt;</description>
					    	
				    
				    
				
				<category>review</category>
    			<pubDate>
    				
    					
    					
    					
    						
    						
    							
    							
    								May 6, 2008
    							
    						
    					
    				
    			</pubDate>    
    		</item>
		
			<item>
				
					
   						<title>The History Channel: Battle for the Pacific (Screenshots)</title>
    				
    				
    				
    			
    			
					
				    
				    	<link>http://www.gamesradar.com/ps3/the-history-channel-battle-for-the-pacific/screenshots/g-20080505164836338036</link>
				    
				
				
				    
    				
				    
				    	<description></description>
				    
				
				<category>screenshot</category>
    			<pubDate>
    				
    					
    					
    					
    						
    						
    							
    							
    								May 5, 2008
    							
    						
    					
    				
    			</pubDate>    
    		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
