Quantcast

Killzone 2


It's the moment of truth – can the PS3's prettiest shooter live up to its own hype?

Words: Mikel Reparaz, GamesRadar US

Speaking of those characters, you’ll be accompanied at nearly all times by at least one of your three squadmates: there’s Rico (the barking thug), Natko (the grizzled asshole) and Garza (the smart one), who you’ll be spending the most time with. All three are generally competent, tough and useful in a fight, although Sev seems to be the only one with skills other than shooting a gun; you’re the only one who revives downed allies, sets explosives, switches weapons, drives vehicles or turns valve-like switches to open massive doors. Skilled or no, your squadmates are also really chatty, and their f-bomb-laced banter is a big part of what strings the story along.

They’re so integral to the story and game, in fact, that it’s surprising that co-op play wasn’t included as an option. To ignore it when it’s become such a common feature in shooters is one thing, but a game in which you rely on teammates to watch your back, lift you over obstacles and open doors seems tailor-made for charging through with a friend.

But whatever. The action holds up fine without a real buddy along. Killzone 2’s a pretty straightforward shooter, and most of your time will be spent just perforating squads of Helghast as you jog between primary objectives, which usually involve blowing something up or clearing the way for everyone else (both done with near-flawless use of Sixaxis motion controls). Sometimes you’ll even get to commandeer a tank, warship turret or robot exoskeleton, all of which are a lot of fun despite only showing up briefly for short-range runs.

When you’re on foot, sticking to cover plays a big role, and when the action gets thick, you can duck behind any waist-high object and lean out to shoot. In general it works well, but not always; the first-person perspective sometimes makes it difficult to judge how well you’re actually hidden, and it also feels strangely incomplete, because everyone except you is able to blind-fire around cover, while you have to poke your head out to aim.
 
At their best, the game’s firefights are crowded, pitched set pieces, with Helghast pouring in from every angle and doing their impressive best to duck out of your line of fire and get the drop on you. (At their worst, they’re typical corridor shootouts. But what pretty corridors!) You can only carry one “main” weapon (assault rifle, shotgun, flamethrower, etc.) into battle at a time, along with a pistol, knife and a handful of grenades. It’s a pain in the ass, but it makes planning ahead and conserving ammo especially important. It’s also easier than you’d think, because as enjoyable as it is, the action can get pretty predictable.

Probably the key flaw in Killzone 2 is how meticulously scripted it is. For example, if a Helghast is programmed to run to a certain location and then start shooting, he usually won’t shoot until he gets there, even if you’ve ambushed him and are filling him with holes. When enemies show up for a big set-piece battle, they’ll tend to show up the same way in the same places every time, enabling you to anticipate and pick them off if you’ve died and started the battle over. Some battles, meanwhile, will only begin or end if you’ve walked to a certain point on the map, triggering a key event. Noticing this stuff can help savvy players get ahead, sure, but it can also ruin any sense of immersion the game might have built up.


 
136 Comments
Order Comments: Newest First | Oldest First
Bassist94  - 9 months 27 days ago 
awesome....

and first?
Corsair89  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Killzone 1 was meh for me. Maybe I'll play it, maybe I won't. It looks stunning, though.
Wave360  - 9 months 27 days ago 
OMG!!!! Only a 9!!! HOW MUCH MONEY DID MICROSOFT GIVE YOU THIS TIME!!!
You guys a so biased.
I hate you all
Go die in a hole!!

Ok this has gone on long engouf,
Nice review, im looking forward to this game
Kruiser  - 9 months 27 days ago 
  ▲
 ▲ ▲
John-117  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Great review, I didn't really find gear 2 that amazing, but that's personal preference. February 27th can't come soon enough!
Synster  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Heh. Something tells me Mikel is going to get swarmed with Fanboys over that Gears statement. Anyhow, In my eyes this was a very well written Article, if that, a tad nit picky, but isn't that what Critics are for, people?

A few things I don't understand though is I was listening to a Podcast about this game, and they said if you attempted this Knife ordeal, You, more or less, would get "**** Slapped by the Helghast". Another odd observation is the "predictability" of this. Now I'm no Biased Sony "Playslave", even though I only own that one System. (Disregard my Wii. I haven't played that in like 3 Years. ) But how many unpredictable FPS's are out there? Disregard the Open-world ones because half the times they don't even work. And finally, I can't say for sure, but Gears artistic design may be 'unique' and the such, but nothing really in that made me say "Wow." It was more of the whole combat thing. (Admittedly. )but isn't a little of Greek, Nazi, and Modern day architechture albeit, a little bit more interesting than the Cliched "Imaginative" stuff out there? Though I'll agree Gears is more brutal, since Killzone has always gone for that "realistic" approach, over Gears Brutal, Violent one.

Unfortunately, They're still fanboys out there that'll skim over this entire Article and call GR Biased "Xbots". Ah well. Still well written.
chainchomp  - 9 months 27 days ago 
They should have played Butcher Pete song to the knife video.
Interesting that they did a game comparison, I dunno if i liked that part of the review, although it helped imagine how the game will play. And I do agree that it probably wont be as good as gears 2 because third person shooters are usually better on consoles. The PC is still best for fps, but thats not going to stop me buying this on release.
EdHas503  - 9 months 27 days ago 
OMG LOL BALLs (BLOLLS?) 9/10 THIS REVIEW IS SO BIASED IM GOING ON NEOGAF RIGHT NOW AND BLOGGING THIS SHIT
3 PAGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AS A PROFICIENT DIGG USER IM INSULTED ITS TOO LONG MAN
I HOPE WIKIPARAZ CHOKES ON HIS MICROSOFT POINTS LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
klempfner  - 9 months 27 days ago 
not a bad review but what do you mean the multiplayer can drag? i played the beta and it was awesome i didn't see anything wrong in the beta (apart from the RL which they fixed).
DasavageJ  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Uhm now I have mixed feelings (IN KNOW WAY GET ME WRONG THIS IS A MUST BUY FOR ME) because on the one hand the graphics are topped only buy Crysis (unfair comparison) and are only neared buy Gears2, also the multiplayer seems pretty solid following in the footsteps of CoD4 which is great four me, along with the never before seen FPS cover system, and the realistic weight of your character. On the other hand the team really missed out on some obviously cool features: Co-OP both splitscreen and online, Multiplayer Splitscreen(I'm not actually sure on this), blind fire from the awesome cover system(to easy to implement I mean really cmon now), better cursors (lol thats just me), an at least slightly wider variety of SciFi weapons and vehicles, and finally the implementation of the cover system in online mode("If you dont like it sont use but at least its there if you want it" would seem like a smarter response than ripping the system out).

All in all I near fully agree with this review and am now once again awaiting
THE NEXT BIGGEST PS3 GAME!!! out there likely released in 2010. Owell life goes on.

On a side note I would like to add that all though you guys may seem kind of biased toward the 360 at times I must admit that when I really look for the things you guys are talking about they do show up as small gripes aside from the graphics, the PS3s use of scale in brightness of different areas and objects has always attracted me more. And this is coming from a guy who has owned two PS3s after breaking one (I threw it down some stairs in rebellion of my dad... worst.. desicion/day.. EVER!!!) and is about to buy his third PSP, stupid screen cracks, so believe me when I say that Sony isn't doing ANYWHERE NEAR AS BAD AS THE 360 FANBOYS may think although our PS3 fanboys tend to talk a lot of shit too but hey there just being fans.


anyway nice article and GR keep up the good work!!!







wow this was long
garnsr  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I liked the cop show bit, and was wondering how it compares to the other big shooters, and hey, there's comparison at the end! Cool. I've never gotten into FPS, and this won't get me started, but good review Mikel.
mrmitts123  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I commend you guys for at least staying true to your word of not "hating" Killzone 2. But Gears 2's MP is broken so maybe you should scratch that.
RonnyLive19881  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Good review! I really didn't see this game topping Gears 2 anyway. As long as it is a good FPS I'll be happy. I do hate how PS3 bots seem to act like this game is Obama's second coming. I think they need to get over both of them...
K206  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I'm glad you guys gave a pretty fair review.

The one thing that bothers me is, gears 2 is probably one of the worst online experiences I've ever had. In fact the game itself is so boring and predictable, I think Halo 3 is way better than gears 2 is.
AmazingKG3  - 9 months 27 days ago 
ya Mikel, come podcast 37, I would bet money that youll tell us how people are gonna want to cut you for that score and comments. I think that is an extremely fair score, and a solid review (Halo comment agreed), cant wait to get my hands on that demo in 3 days.
jar-head  - 9 months 27 days ago 
agreed: ▲
▲ ▲
newgames128  - 9 months 27 days ago 
With all the complaints I've heard on various boards about Gears of War 2's multiplayer problems, it's pretty surprising to read Gamesradar saying it's better. Considering I haven't really heard anywhere near as many complaints about Killzone 2's mp, even from the beta. Also, Gears 2's level design isn't as varied as they'd like us to believe. Almost half of it takes place in a dark and dingy cave. But everyone has their own opinions right.
GamesRadarMikelReparaz  - 9 months 27 days ago 
@klempfner: If you're playing through all five game types (which by default last about five minutes each) in a single match, it adds up to a long time spent retreading the same ground in a single level. That's adjustable, of course (so long as you're hosting the game), and it's still fun, but after a while my short attention span desperately wanted a change of scenery. Especially in skirmish mode. Bots are poor company.
RandyChimp  - 9 months 27 days ago 
only gamesradar could knock off points because multiplayer matches drag on. Sigh! Other than that, and the fact that this site is obviously blowing Microsoft on a regular basis, good review.
GoldenMe  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I lawled at the CIS reference.

Although the game just still seems generic to me.

Great review anyways. Hope PS3 fanboys won't storm your building and try to burn you all at the stake.
This video player requires Flash 9 Player or later. Please download the latest Flash Player.
The Knowledge

Killzone 2

Genre: Shooter
Expected release date: 02/27/2009
Published by: SCEA
Developed by: Guerrilla Games
9 AWESOME
Read the review
Latest Articles About This Game
It's the moment of truth – can the PS3's prettiest shooter live up to its own hype?
PS3 Review  -  2 Feb 2009