Quantcast

Killzone 2


It's the moment of truth – can the PS3's prettiest shooter live up to its own hype?

Words: Mikel Reparaz, GamesRadar US

In the four years that we’ve known about it, Killzone 2 has been all but defined by one incident, so let’s get this out of the way right off the bat: yes, Killzone 2 lives up to the infamous “target footage” clip that roused legions of skeptics at the 2005 Electronic Entertainment Expo. It even surpasses it, although if you’ve been following the game over the last few months, you probably know that already.


Above: You may even have seen this 2005/2008 comparison video

So, yes, Killzone 2 is a graphical powerhouse. No disputing that. Despite its dismally gray color palette, it renders the war-torn planet Helghan in meticulous detail, and the corridors, city streets and industrial hellholes you fight through feel like believable, lived-in environments. The gasmask-wearing, Nazi-like Helghast troops you’ll fight are just as beautifully rendered and animated, and it’s weirdly fun to watch them flail and jerk as you hammer their impossibly tough bodies with bullets.

More importantly, Killzone 2 is an excellent shooter that’s faster, prettier and much more chaotic than its predecessors. It’s also relentlessly gritty, and its weapons, vehicles and architecture are so low-tech and dingy that the action feels much closer to World War II than to your average space-marine shooter. In fact, it’s not a stretch to say that this is the closest thing there is right now to a sci-fi Call of Duty.

Even with that said, Killzone 2 still has a lot more to prove than the average shooter. It’s one of the most important, make-it-or-break-it titles for the PS3, but it’s been met with heavy skepticism every step of the way. That’s not really surprising, given the game’s sketchy past. Aside from the spec footage, there’s the first PS2 game, which was hyped before release as a “Halo-killer” and instead turned out to be a slick but fairly slow-paced trudge through “realistic” sci-fi battles inspired by actual 20th-century warzones.


Above: The first Killzone. Average score on Metacritic – 70

Then there was the PSP sequel, Killzone: Liberation, which - despite improving on the original - wasn’t actually a shooter, and therefore didn’t say anything about developer Guerilla Games’ ability to craft one.


Above: Killzone: Liberation. Average score on Metacritic – 77

It also doesn’t help that “Killzone” is exactly the kind of ultra-generic name that uncreative cop-show writers use whenever they want to insert a “message” about “video violence” into the weekly murder plot.

All that stuff just makes what Killzone 2 has achieved that much more significant. Putting you into the boots of Sgt. Tomas “Sev” Sevchenko, a new character under the command of series regular Rico Velasquez, Killzone 2 throws you into the invasion of the inhospitable planet Helghan, which is roughly as significant within the game as marching into Berlin was during WWII. You’ll see every second of the campaign unfold through Sev’s eyes, from the first moments aboard his army’s gleaming dropship to the final confrontation with the Helghast leaders. His story’s fairly predictable (assuming you’ve ever seen a war movie), but it’s well told, and the characters – simple as they are – are memorable and likable enough to keep it from ever feeling generic.


 
136 Comments
Order Comments: Newest First | Oldest First
Bassist94  - 9 months 6 days ago 
awesome....

and first?
Corsair89  - 9 months 6 days ago 
Killzone 1 was meh for me. Maybe I'll play it, maybe I won't. It looks stunning, though.
Wave360  - 9 months 6 days ago 
OMG!!!! Only a 9!!! HOW MUCH MONEY DID MICROSOFT GIVE YOU THIS TIME!!!
You guys a so biased.
I hate you all
Go die in a hole!!

Ok this has gone on long engouf,
Nice review, im looking forward to this game
Kruiser  - 9 months 6 days ago 
  ▲
 ▲ ▲
John-117  - 9 months 6 days ago 
Great review, I didn't really find gear 2 that amazing, but that's personal preference. February 27th can't come soon enough!
Synster  - 9 months 6 days ago 
Heh. Something tells me Mikel is going to get swarmed with Fanboys over that Gears statement. Anyhow, In my eyes this was a very well written Article, if that, a tad nit picky, but isn't that what Critics are for, people?

A few things I don't understand though is I was listening to a Podcast about this game, and they said if you attempted this Knife ordeal, You, more or less, would get "**** Slapped by the Helghast". Another odd observation is the "predictability" of this. Now I'm no Biased Sony "Playslave", even though I only own that one System. (Disregard my Wii. I haven't played that in like 3 Years. ) But how many unpredictable FPS's are out there? Disregard the Open-world ones because half the times they don't even work. And finally, I can't say for sure, but Gears artistic design may be 'unique' and the such, but nothing really in that made me say "Wow." It was more of the whole combat thing. (Admittedly. )but isn't a little of Greek, Nazi, and Modern day architechture albeit, a little bit more interesting than the Cliched "Imaginative" stuff out there? Though I'll agree Gears is more brutal, since Killzone has always gone for that "realistic" approach, over Gears Brutal, Violent one.

Unfortunately, They're still fanboys out there that'll skim over this entire Article and call GR Biased "Xbots". Ah well. Still well written.
chainchomp  - 9 months 6 days ago 
They should have played Butcher Pete song to the knife video.
Interesting that they did a game comparison, I dunno if i liked that part of the review, although it helped imagine how the game will play. And I do agree that it probably wont be as good as gears 2 because third person shooters are usually better on consoles. The PC is still best for fps, but thats not going to stop me buying this on release.
EdHas503  - 9 months 6 days ago 
OMG LOL BALLs (BLOLLS?) 9/10 THIS REVIEW IS SO BIASED IM GOING ON NEOGAF RIGHT NOW AND BLOGGING THIS SHIT
3 PAGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AS A PROFICIENT DIGG USER IM INSULTED ITS TOO LONG MAN
I HOPE WIKIPARAZ CHOKES ON HIS MICROSOFT POINTS LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
klempfner  - 9 months 6 days ago 
not a bad review but what do you mean the multiplayer can drag? i played the beta and it was awesome i didn't see anything wrong in the beta (apart from the RL which they fixed).
DasavageJ  - 9 months 6 days ago 
Uhm now I have mixed feelings (IN KNOW WAY GET ME WRONG THIS IS A MUST BUY FOR ME) because on the one hand the graphics are topped only buy Crysis (unfair comparison) and are only neared buy Gears2, also the multiplayer seems pretty solid following in the footsteps of CoD4 which is great four me, along with the never before seen FPS cover system, and the realistic weight of your character. On the other hand the team really missed out on some obviously cool features: Co-OP both splitscreen and online, Multiplayer Splitscreen(I'm not actually sure on this), blind fire from the awesome cover system(to easy to implement I mean really cmon now), better cursors (lol thats just me), an at least slightly wider variety of SciFi weapons and vehicles, and finally the implementation of the cover system in online mode("If you dont like it sont use but at least its there if you want it" would seem like a smarter response than ripping the system out).

All in all I near fully agree with this review and am now once again awaiting
THE NEXT BIGGEST PS3 GAME!!! out there likely released in 2010. Owell life goes on.

On a side note I would like to add that all though you guys may seem kind of biased toward the 360 at times I must admit that when I really look for the things you guys are talking about they do show up as small gripes aside from the graphics, the PS3s use of scale in brightness of different areas and objects has always attracted me more. And this is coming from a guy who has owned two PS3s after breaking one (I threw it down some stairs in rebellion of my dad... worst.. desicion/day.. EVER!!!) and is about to buy his third PSP, stupid screen cracks, so believe me when I say that Sony isn't doing ANYWHERE NEAR AS BAD AS THE 360 FANBOYS may think although our PS3 fanboys tend to talk a lot of shit too but hey there just being fans.


anyway nice article and GR keep up the good work!!!







wow this was long
garnsr  - 9 months 6 days ago 
I liked the cop show bit, and was wondering how it compares to the other big shooters, and hey, there's comparison at the end! Cool. I've never gotten into FPS, and this won't get me started, but good review Mikel.
mrmitts123  - 9 months 6 days ago 
I commend you guys for at least staying true to your word of not "hating" Killzone 2. But Gears 2's MP is broken so maybe you should scratch that.
RonnyLive19881  - 9 months 6 days ago 
Good review! I really didn't see this game topping Gears 2 anyway. As long as it is a good FPS I'll be happy. I do hate how PS3 bots seem to act like this game is Obama's second coming. I think they need to get over both of them...
K206  - 9 months 6 days ago 
I'm glad you guys gave a pretty fair review.

The one thing that bothers me is, gears 2 is probably one of the worst online experiences I've ever had. In fact the game itself is so boring and predictable, I think Halo 3 is way better than gears 2 is.
AmazingKG3  - 9 months 6 days ago 
ya Mikel, come podcast 37, I would bet money that youll tell us how people are gonna want to cut you for that score and comments. I think that is an extremely fair score, and a solid review (Halo comment agreed), cant wait to get my hands on that demo in 3 days.
jar-head  - 9 months 6 days ago 
agreed: ▲
▲ ▲
newgames128  - 9 months 6 days ago 
With all the complaints I've heard on various boards about Gears of War 2's multiplayer problems, it's pretty surprising to read Gamesradar saying it's better. Considering I haven't really heard anywhere near as many complaints about Killzone 2's mp, even from the beta. Also, Gears 2's level design isn't as varied as they'd like us to believe. Almost half of it takes place in a dark and dingy cave. But everyone has their own opinions right.
GamesRadarMikelReparaz  - 9 months 6 days ago 
@klempfner: If you're playing through all five game types (which by default last about five minutes each) in a single match, it adds up to a long time spent retreading the same ground in a single level. That's adjustable, of course (so long as you're hosting the game), and it's still fun, but after a while my short attention span desperately wanted a change of scenery. Especially in skirmish mode. Bots are poor company.
RandyChimp  - 9 months 6 days ago 
only gamesradar could knock off points because multiplayer matches drag on. Sigh! Other than that, and the fact that this site is obviously blowing Microsoft on a regular basis, good review.
GoldenMe  - 9 months 6 days ago 
I lawled at the CIS reference.

Although the game just still seems generic to me.

Great review anyways. Hope PS3 fanboys won't storm your building and try to burn you all at the stake.
This video player requires Flash 9 Player or later. Please download the latest Flash Player.
The Knowledge

Killzone 2

Genre: Shooter
Expected release date: 02/27/2009
Published by: SCEA
Developed by: Guerrilla Games
9 AWESOME
Read the review
Latest Articles About This Game
It's the moment of truth – can the PS3's prettiest shooter live up to its own hype?
PS3 Review  -  Feb 2, 2009