OH SHIT GR WITH THE FALSE INFO

I am eagerly counting the seconds until Forza 3. 2 was my first ever sim racer, and it was freaking great. Never before had I played a racer without trying to crash people (well, I did that a little too, but still)! The tuning and customizing was the best, though, because I never thought I could get so excited about shaving seconds off of my lap time. For me, GT for PSP has 800 cars, so I think it's a bit pathetic that NFSS has like 65. That's a bit lazy. And yes, I use almost all of the cars. You need certain cars for a certain track because of how they can be tuned. I highly doubt NFSS can make me enjoy the meager amount of content they're trying to fill their game with. Money-grabbing, really. It'll sell well too, which is really a shame. Hopefully NFS will be dead by next iteration, especially if they start charging real money for retarded useless crap like in Carbon. Goodbye NFS, say hello to the future: GT5 and FM3.

In the words of GamesRadar, taken from the inFamous wikipedia article, "Gripped by a powerful indecision, most reviewers end up glancing at the clock, shrugging and tapping the 7 key. Done! Moral crisis averted. Time for a nap."

You know GamesRadar, for the first time, I couldn't agree more.

Fanboys? Actually, all I've seen are inFamous bashers saying, "Good review". I think it's retarded that this game got a 7. Personally, I think IGN and Gamespot are more credible when it comes to reviews, and they averaged a 9.1. What could gamesradar possibly see that those two much more successful sites didn't? Well, maybe they weren't biased by playing Prototype. See, Gamespot doesn't let reviewers play similar games to ones that they're reviewing. Why? Because, it will obviously create bias. I'll agree, sometimes you stick to things you don't want to, but all you have to do is hit circle. That's it! And as for your "no life" in Empire City, I've played the demo four times, exploring around, and I've almost equaled my total play time of a game I actually own, Grand Theft Auto 4. Just being able to climb and get around the city in different, interesting ways makes this city awesome. And as for the graphics, I think the game looks GREAT. Prototype looks like shit; maybe a little better than a PS2 game, and up until a few days ago, I was completely psyched about Prototype. Then I saw inFamous, which seems to have a much better story, much better game design, and much better graphics. I personally am looking forward to this game more than any other game since Gears 2 (which fucking sucked). I'm about to go play the demo a fifth time, because I, unlike some biased reviewers and haters, can appreciate inFamous for what it is: A fast-paced, mind-blowing romp through the streets of a living, breathing city, with enough ridiculous powers to light the whole damn place up. I recommend you all do the same.

Final Fantasy VII is WAAAAAAAAY better than you guys make it out to be. The story was great, the gameplay was incredibly deep (when you finally found some incredible combination of materia that worked well against Sephiroth, it was pretty freaking rewarding), AND Aerith is better understood after playing Crisis Core, but I did walk away from the game knowing that she was way more than just some face. Please note: I played and beat this in 2007 for the first time ever. I had an N64, not a PS1 (unfortunately) so I played it on my PS2. It's my second favorite game of all-time, only to FFX. It's truly a matter of preference, but if you're really into RPGs, you'd be a fool not to appreciate the sheer depth (visually and gameplay-wise) of this game. Perhaps you don't like it, but I don't like Zelda at all. I think Zelda should be number 1 on your list. Ocarina of time, actually. Why? Because I don't like it. At all. Oh wait, I don't like adventure games that much and that's a completely unfair assessment of a game I've barely even played. Maybe I should apply for a job here.