"between now and 2014"
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

I really wanted to love LA Noire when it came out. I played it on the 360 straight through until I got to disc 3. The game just kind of fell flat at that point. Repetitive, uninteresting. The "newness" wore off and what I was left with was a sad, shell of a game that could've been so much more. And that was before Bondi went to shit. So I might pick up the sequel, but they'll have to come up with a better reason for me to buy it than "its made by Rockstar"

that pokemon link is f*cking crazy

Firstly, how is an 8 mediocre? Second, you must not have played an Uncharted game before. Yes, it's fun to watch the cinematics and essentially let the game-world play out without you in it, but Uncharted is so much more than that. It's the culmination of great graphics, fun, fluid gameplay and an engaging, immersive story that make Uncharted games feel like a movie. They aren't perfect, but they're damn close. I bet that the game would have been given a lesser score if it were missing a coherent story or fun gameplay than just the cinematics.

Instead of locking used games, why don't they just make legislature that allows devs to get some profit from used sales? Seems like it would be a lot simpler to just make retailers pay devs a certain percentage for a used game rather than f*ck their fans over by forcing people to buy new. And make it illegal for a small business (family owned, pawn shop etc.) to sell videogames without registering with a certain company (whether it's the company that made the game, or a new entity that would manage the sales of all used games for the videogames industry). Also, gamers aren't going to be the only ones "up in arms" about locking used games. Retailers are going to take a major hit, too. I bet places like Gamestop get most of their profit off of used games. Stores like that are sure as hell not going to give up without some sort of fight. I understand why devs are upset, and I think there is some middle ground here where devs and gamers can compromise, but I think it is greedy and selfish to force people to buy your game new for more money.

Ok what you're saying about supporting the devs makes sense, but use some common sense of your own. Higher prices on games means less sales. Less sales means less profit. Less profit means less money to use to make more games.

Also, you don't need to bitch and moan to the airlines to get lower prices. Just use whatever brainpower you have and plan your trips in advance. Save a ton of money.

I think that blocking demo access, or offering exclusive demo access, actually markets the product more than just releasing it simultaneously. Yes, it feels like a slap in the face to PS3 owners eagerly awaiting the game, but I think that there will be an even bigger buzz about the demo because of the fact that they decided to release it earlier to specific people.

I guess why I like the "real" zombies more than Las Plagas is because a vast majority of the people you fight with Las Plagas look and behave like angry people trying to stab you or beat you up instead of bloodthirsty monsters trying to eat you. I mean, traditional zombies are more mindless and could adapt their tactics, to an extent, to try to get at you but Las Plagas victims can speak and think and act almost normal which lessened the immersion factor for me.

I'm just pumped for some real zombies finally. Las Plagas was boring and stupid

yeah but why would you expect it to? you know it's on the ipad and not a console so quit complaining.