Ok, I'm gonna be straight. PS3 is a very good console. Very, very good. It has the processing power of a super computer, and has more functionality than a space shuttle. XBox 360 is also a good console, but it isn't on par with PS3. 360 has a TON of games, a lot more than PS3; but why is that? Simply, 360 has been out a much longer time than it's rival. It has, over time, amassed many times more games, and that brings me to another thought. 360 was released in 2005. That was quite a long time ago as far as technology is concerned. 360 is eldest brother of the Next-Gen family and has gone farther and longer than the others. But I big complaint that I have with XBox in a whole is this:
PS2 is still going. Even though it is old as sin and has the most outdated graphics by standards today, they still make games for it. This is because not everybody can afford a PS3. Some say PS3 has outrageous prices. I say it has extremely low prices. Why? Think of all the power that is contained inside a PS3. Far greater than any 360 ever. It should be MORE expensive (but thank Zeus it's not). XBox, on the other hand, did something rather foolish in my opinion: The second 360 came out, they discontinued all XBox titles. They completely switched to their Next-Gen behemoth. To make matters worse, they made it near impossible for you to get a 360 which could play old XBox games while still allowing you to stay in budget. XBox was a very short lived console. It never had time to show its true power. PS2 has though. It has shown us that even though it's old and by all standards should be a piece of junk it keeps pushing past its limits and making great games. SW: The Force Unleashed for PS2 is an amazing game! PS2 is good still, and it will be some time before it completely dies out. It'll probably outlive PSP (which was a sad story for a great idea).

I have an XBox 360. Good console. Has some glitches and bugs, but a good system still. It does have very good graphics but I don't believe they are the same as PS3 (though very close to it). The reason for this is that it has been out longer. They did rush its production which caused it to have some problems. Why they did this I'll never know. PS3 and 360 have pretty much the same games for it. We are in an age of Multi-Platformation. Most games for 360 can be or soon will be for PS3. So they are similar in that aspect.

They each have their good qualities and bad qualities. It has been my experience that online works very well on PS3, and its free. XBox Live is good too, but you shouldn't have to pay to play. It would just be a nice add-on that would make me love 360 more. Also, people on XBox Live are sometimes douchebags. And also, studies show that majority of students who shoot up their schools own 360s. 360 has a lot of shooters. That's actually the majority of their games. It's wasy to see how someone could get violent from playing mindless shooting games (which I enjoy much). But it's good to get some variety once in a while. Fable II should bring that. I can't wait.

I feel like I have gone too far. Let me conclude. PS3 is good. XBox 360 is good. Wii is good. They all have their good qualities. While it may be difficult to compare Wii to other consoles, PS3 and 360 seem to always be at war with each other. I'd like to say that we should all give it a break, but that would be impossible. People will always remain ignorant to 360's great qualities, or PS3's. I would like all who read this to take into consideration the words I have written on this wall. Do not blindly accuse anything of being worthless or a piece of trash without great study on it. This goes for all things, man and machine alike.

Ok, I'm gonna be straight. PS3 is a very good console. Very, very good. It has the processing power of a super computer, and has more functionality than a space shuttle. XBox 360 is also a good console, but it isn't on par with PS3. 360 has a TON of games, a lot more than PS3; but why is that? Simply, 360 has been out a much longer time than it's rival. It has, over time, amassed many times more games, and that brings me to another thought. 360 was released in 2005. That was quite a long time ago as far as technology is concerned. 360 is eldest brother of the Next-Gen family and has gone farther and longer than the others. But I big complaint that I have with XBox in a whole is this:
PS2 is still going. Even though it is old as sin and has the most outdated graphics by standards today, they still make games for it. This is because not everybody can afford a PS3. Some say PS3 has outrageous prices. I say it has extremely low prices. Why? Think of all the power that is contained inside a PS3. Far greater than any 360 ever. It should be MORE expensive (but thank Zeus it's not). XBox, on the other hand, did something rather foolish in my opinion: The second 360 came out, they discontinued all XBox titles. They completely switched to their Next-Gen behemoth. To make matters worse, they made it near impossible for you to get a 360 which could play old XBox games while still allowing you to stay in budget. XBox was a very short lived console. It never had time to show its true power. PS2 has though. It has shown us that even though it's old and by all standards should be a piece of junk it keeps pushing past its limits and making great games. SW: The Force Unleashed for PS2 is an amazing game! PS2 is good still, and it will be some time before it completely dies out. It'll probably outlive PSP (which was a sad story for a great idea).

I have an XBox 360. Good console. Has some glitches and bugs, but a good system still. It does have very good graphics but I don't believe they are the same as PS3 (though very close to it). The reason for this is that it has been out longer. They did rush its production which caused it to have some problems. Why they did this I'll never know. PS3 and 360 have pretty much the same games for it. We are in an age of Multi-Platformation. Most games for 360 can be or soon will be for PS3. So they are similar in that aspect.

They each have their good qualities and bad qualities. It has been my experience that online works very well on PS3, and its free. XBox Live is good too, but you shouldn't have to pay to play. It would just be a nice add-on that would make me love 360 more. Also, people on XBox Live are sometimes douchebags. And also, studies show that majority of students who shoot up their schools own 360s. 360 has a lot of shooters. That's actually the majority of their games. It's wasy to see how someone could get violent from playing mindless shooting games (which I enjoy much). But it's good to get some variety once in a while. Fable II should bring that. I can't wait.

I feel like I have gone too far. Let me conclude. PS3 is good. XBox 360 is good. Wii is good. They all have their good qualities. While it may be difficult to compare Wii to other consoles, PS3 and 360 seem to always be at war with each other. I'd like to say that we should all give it a break, but that would be impossible. People will always remain ignorant to 360's great qualities, or PS3's. I would like all who read this to take into consideration the words I have written on this wall. Do not blindly accuse anything of being worthless or a piece of trash without great study on it. This goes for all things, man and machine alike.