I'm not sure. But the good ending shoes the little sister grown up. Mabye you play her he dreams. and her memories of rapture. It is called Sea of Dreams. So yeah in short. After good endings, little sister memories of rapture, dreams, prequel showing her memories.

shoulda been Sonic in here.

I cracked up at the end

My friend is a Devil child. He is fat, He lies about every thing he says, He is twelve, He sits home playing xbox and playing g-mod on the computer, he makes excuses about going outside to the park harrasing little kids in elementary school (ain't I the worst), Lastly, one time on a saturday mourning he told his mom this "Yes mom, I want a plate of bacon pancakes and waffles". Oh and did I mentin he is fat?

I'm gonna shot my self if my family becomes number 5. That's is the most annoying crap ever!

I remember F-Zero GX......horrible, regretful, terrible,....expensive times....

Ha that last one "GAME OVER YAAAAH!!"

GUNMETALAK, if it wasn't all caps it would be Violence

Oh and plus Weird James Face you're a true idiot. The graphics are way better in WaW then Modern Warfare. The gameplay is the same. And.....Well you got me on the AI, But what do you mean WaW doesn't have Live!!!

Killzone vs Gears of war


Visuals: Gears of war. Killzone looks to fuzzy.

Setting/Story/Characters: Setting, Gears. Story, Gears. Characters/Gears. Short and simple

Combat: Well both games are just shoot the enemie. But Gears of War you can hide from cover and have a lot more options like if you want to switch to the other side of the door in a seacond.

Friends/Enemies: The friends in killzone just seem a bit more true. Enemies...c,mon gears of war I mean seriously.

Vehicles: The vehicles in Gears of War get seriosuly way too annoying!

Weapons: The weapons in Gears of War get frustrating and confusing, like the mortar for example.

Multiplayer: Team deathmatch, control points blah blah blah like we never player something like that before. Gears of War horde and it doesnt have a concept of just shooting the crap out of the other team.

Killzone vs Call of Duty World at War.

Visuals: WaW it's just more real like

Setting/Story/Characters: Only WaW delivers what war really looks like. Story WaW since well It's World War II! Characters, well SGT. Reznov is the most coolest and badass character I ever see, so WaW.

Combat: Well they are basically the same but I'm going with WaW because you face dozens of soilders and tanks.

Friends/Enemies: Friends, again SGT.Reznov. Enemies, "Damn those japanese are brutal!!!"

Vehicles: Who doesn't want a tank with a flamethrower built in!

Weapons: The only thing special of WaW is a flamethrower and Ray gun. So killzone wins that one.

Multiplayer: With zombie mode a dozen of match choices, and dozens of perks and customize your own classes each with unique special abilities depeneding on what you put. Who doesn't think WaW wins that. (People who never played WaW probably would think Killzone is better)

NOTE* I did'nt include Resistance because I never player Resistance.

Like to tell me why Naruto has most episodes just talking?

actually half life has a decent story. G-man really does a good job and make you think. But portal and Bioshock what really good stories. Bioshock probably the best in my opinion

Wow now I know where I'm going for my vacation ^.^

I didn't really like Fallout3 :( I wish I could but the combat is unbelievably slow for me.

Sorry let me rephrase that. NOTE:who ever thinks bioshock suck probably never played bioshock

My opinion
Setting: Gotta go with modern warfare. to me World at Wars setting is pretty dull....woods, and trees not that interesting.

Weapons: World at War personally. First of all there is no difference in accuracy. Who doesn't want a flame thrower and Molotov's?

Missions: Hard choice but World at War is better in my opinion. Escaping a drowning cargo ship isn't as hard WHEN IT DOESN'T SINK UNTIL YOU GET ON THE CHOPPER! Besides who doesn't want to fight in one of the most bloodiest battles in history: D day

Story: Modern warfare because of its ending.....so sad when everyone dies at the end SPOILER ALERT! ops too late....

Characters: Modern Warfare......thats a no brainier to me.

Multiplayer: Wow toughest choice of the entire game.... Modern warfare...because of its more intense battles.

Co-op: You know!

Cheats: World at War....seriously who thinks super contrast is a cheat?

Originality: Really both games are not original at all. But I don't like ties so I'm going with World at War. Zombies, not to mention the lost forgotten flamethrower in WW2.

By 1 point World at War wins in my opinion 5-4
Before everyone else yells stuff at me like (U NUBZ CD4 IS WYZ BETRS)Think of this. ITS EVERYBODYS OPINION

Story: It really does come to a close call but.....I have to go with halo with its long history. Setting: Bioshock wins with no doubt. Art: Bioshock wins again for the OUTRAGEOUS graphics and art. Multiplayer: Halo wins.....you know that. Combat: Now it comes so close It's hard for me to choose....but....I think Bioshock wins in its originality of combat and game play of plasmids, strategy's, and combinations of those strategy's. NOTE: usually people who say halo sucks probably never played Bioshock. so further ado Bioshock wins in my opinion. Winning by 3/5. Really close call.