Actually, Tyler, cm1978 has a point. In this Tiger Woods review, one of the main hinderances is the "so-so visuals." The only mention of the graphics in the body of the review are the two words "ordinary visuals" in the last paragraph. This also seems to be the case with the "Invisible galleries" as well. I mean, Richard can't expect people to take him seriously if he's introducing (nondescriptly) the major drawbacks in the summary of the review. And how are these kinds of comments referring to differences from previous iterations of the game? Dude, maybe you should double-check the review you're discussing before you tell another poster to double-check their game experience.