Someone should do a similar article, only about Cundy.

Also, the first time I tried to speedrun it, I included the cutscenes, but I concluded that it is pretty much impossible to get the time you guys got while excluding the cutscenes (I got, like, 4.20, especially considering I straight up ran through it, and you guys had problems with the first monster and the exploding monster, that time seems silly).

So I tried it again, excluded the cutscenes, and got 3.17.

So I guess I'll count that as the actual time.

Wrong, Justin. I don't know how you came to that conclusion, but after having played the demo many, many times, and already finding this out on the FIRST TRY, I know that the last monster, the spiky one, does NOT have to be killed.

Me too! It's definitely my most-anticipated 3DS title, and possibly overall. Though I do have a lot of others who fiercely compete with it, so I don't know what to put at number one, but KH is definitely in my, like...top 5.

Wait, so. On the Xbox 360, Saints Row: The Third is better than Modern Warfare 3, but on the PS3...it isn't?

Only that it IS satire.

I didn't follow videogame news that intently back then, but were the Legend of Zeldas on the DS really THAT big a system sellers? I don't really...remember them being.

There's loads of other great stuff coming for the 3DS. It just needs to get here.

The city...aye. The scenery looks very boobiful...err, I mean beautiful. And I'm sure so's Elizabeth's story. I'm sure it'll be very...heart-touching and...mammar--memorable.

Well, there are more gamers that have girlfriends and wives than those that have offspring. Y'know, since male gamers can't impregnate themselves and birth their offspring theirselves...

I don't get why you people whine so fucking much about everything, since the bloody description reads "Link is helping you to save Hyrule and rescue princess Zelda".

Seems more like just an innocent slip.

It'd be amazing if they somehow figured how to create a kind of invisible wall for a controller in the real world, so that when you hit a lightsaber, your controller couldn't move past some point in space.

I can't imagine how, but hey, caveman would have their minds literally blown to pieces seeing what we have. It might happen in the future.

And when it does, it'll be marvellous.

Not to mention that when we get to virtual reality and games'll start to be shown to you only in your brain, then they can manipulate your brain to create the effect of hitting something physically.

Yeah, I thought it looked good. The explanation for why it's bad utterly confused me.

Even though it hasn't been some kind of earth-shattering, world-changing sale, yes, I agree, I've still gotten plenty of games out of it. Brink, LIMBO, Mass Effect 2, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky.

Also, I couldn't buy anything during the first two days because of credit card-related problems, but it had some games during that time that I would've gladly bought. Though I only remember Metro 2033 and...what else was there...

Well, there were, like, 3 or 4 other games.

But yeah, I guess it could be better. Since it doesn't really cost them anything, they'd make a whole lot more money if they took some new game, slap a -90% discount on it, and watch their sales skyrocket. I mean, they'd get more money out of the myriad of potential buyers who'd buy it at that price, than the more humble quantity of buyers who buy it at those -50% discounts some of these games see (like Arkham City and Saints Row: The Third. Had those had, like, -80% or, even better, -90% discounts, I would've bought them instantly, and Steam would've still had that potential money I would've given them that they don't have right now).

I know it's such a revered game, and thus no one wants to criticize any aspect of it, and I agree, it's an absolutely balls-out, boner-up, unbelievably great game, but am I the only one who didn't like Arkham City's cover that much? I mean, that positioning and all that white and the position of the logo etc?

I just didn't like it that much, and for a game of such pedigree as Arkham City, I thought it could've been worth mentioning.

WOW YOU MUST SURE BE A HUGE GEEK TO KNOW SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

Doesn't the mass of the wheels in some way hinder it having the same RPM?

If your spelling really is immaculate, and if we even dare consider for a moment you actually know what immaculate means, then let's count the ways how your SPELLING veers off from the path of being immaculate.

The "no" at the beginning of that sentence should be capitalize. "thats" is supposed to have an apostrophe, seeing as it's a contraction. It'd just be easier to re-write your whole post.

"No, that's where you're mistaken. I spell UK that way because I don't give a sh!t about it, or its people, or whether or not they think I should capitalize my letters. That's f*****g stupid. And you're right, I don't really know much about UK's culture, and I don't care to either, because, again, I just don't give a f**k. And right, everyone's familiar with American culture, that's why GTA sells zillions of opies. If they switch to UK sh!t, no one will buy it, 'cause no one gives a sh!t.

And really, if you're gonna get on me about my spelling (which, in fact, is immaculate, it's grammar I don't care about), make sure you don't have any mistakes yourself. 'cause I have no idea what the f**k an "accronymn" is, but I do know what an acronym is."

I've no idea why I did that above, but capitalizing and using contractions is also a part of spelling, you stupid, belligerent, pathetic pile of putrid fail. Also, there's no point to knowing how to spell words if you don't know how to use good syntax and think that spelling only entails using the right letters, but using contractions everywhere without marking them as such is no spelling mistake.

Also, didn't you realize that he was making FUN of you by INTENTIONALLY misspelling acronym? I can deduce from that that you're just searching for things to rag on and whine about and argue against. You're not even paying much attention to what people say, and just take everything at face value.

But yeah, I could agree with the American point (though it's not like Rockstar has really tried to make a full-fledged GTA that tackles some culture other than American). Even though Rockstar did London 1969, or whatever, let's be honest. GTA wasn't eighth of the franchise that it is now. They could well pull it off now. Especially because a lot of people do actually want to see it take place in another culture.

Especially because, maybe unlike you, people know of other very well-known cultures around the world too, almost as well as American.

In conclusion, you may have a point at times, but Jesus. Maybe try getting your ideas across by being less of a dick? You may find that you can actually insert your idealisms into other people's heads without being a complete dick and they may actually consider listening to you.

That trailer did NOT really make the game look impressive. The voicework seemed mediocre, and the graphics are, like, identical! Could've at least given it some kind of a facelift, rather than just raise resolution.

With that said, god damnit did I love this game on the DS, and god damnit if I didn't finish it on the DS. I still have my DS and still have the game, but it may just happen that I put it off 'til the day I find myself having a 3DS and the chance to buy this game and I'll decide, "Hell, I'll just get the "superior" version!"

I agree with my brother, to whom I read this out loud - something like this pushes me over to the side of Modern Warfare 3, rather than Battlefield 3. This is something that'd make me bad for preferring BF3 over MW3. It's just embarrassing.

I haven't even played Arkham Asylum, but yet I'm still weirdly pumped for this game. Seems awesome even without Arkham Asylum's "legacy".

I've really got to get and play Arkham Asylum.

I've no idea if it's too late or not, but here I am.