You owned a Mustang? I own a 1959 Edsel. Oh look! That was a completely irrelevant statement by both of us! Turns out, the GR fellow who posted said scenario-example was referring to a 5-10% rate of failure in a car model, yes? So you had to work on a Mustang... whoopie. Change the oil in it or something? What the scenario was stating was that if 5-10% of a specific model had a serious problem (wheel falling off?), it wouldn't matter if the remaining 90-95% were fine. Same with the game mentioned. You may be able to complete it, but the 5-10% that do not are going to get rather annoyed by it.
Let's go back to the car, shall we? If the wheel of your car were to fall off - would you buy another model from that company? I sure wouldn't. If the game you thought would be awesome turns out to glitch like crazy - would you buy another from same developer? I doubt that, as well. To disclaim that the PlayStation 3 is flawless running this game is a huge misconception. Why would anyone make a game, let it work on "God's console of choice", and then give the bird to anyone who doesn't own said console? I believe your 'points' are very loose and could do with some tightening up.
Like others' have said, a glitch is not a "Let's f*ck with our gamers and make the game freeze.... here!" No. It is a hit-or-miss thing that only occurs if something specific happens. As it turns out, our target is an elephant and we're twenty meters away - much higher hit than miss rate. It's all just a matter of luck, really. If/when this word spreads to these peoples' friends (as I know I'll tell mine), their friends are going to be looking at the game shelf in a store thinking "Will this copy screw me over, or will it be a rare, non-glitched one?" No one wants that kind of thought going through them when they buy something! "Will this vehicle fall apart while I'm driving like I've heard, or will it be a decent vehicle?" There. I did another example for you.
This is my last paragraph! Woo! The only point in this one is fairly simple - If you try to argue with me, I'll be ignoring you. Just go back and play the console that Christ supposedly has given to you.
My only explanation as to why they used "World At War" is....
Since it's not just Europe, they decided to say "world"? If that's the case, I'm wondering why they didn't put "Call of Duty 3: Europe At War". Is it not self explanatory?
I notice that everyone is forgetting that CoD:UO had a flamethrower, also... Personally, I think Call of Duty Four was alright... I didn't really like it because it was centered around some real-world stuff... the statue that fell when I shot it with a Mk.19 reminded me a lot of Huessien's statue falling. Oh gee... that level happened in the Middle East, also. I have a comment for the people who say "You know the outcome already... Allies win. Duh!". This is my comment; Did you honestly think someone would make a game where you did all that crap just to die? No... of course you were going to win. You were with Captain Price for Christ sakes! That's like an auto-win. I personally would choose Call of Duty:World At War, however, as I have been waiting for a good jungle-shooter to come from the CoD franchise... (although I would've preferred Vietnam much more as it had both old and semi-modern weapons) I plan on getting World At War as it seems like a break from the regular Tiger Tanks and Flak88s.
I like both games... Four for it's unique features and "WaW" for it's unique features.
Let's see... I've only been walked-in-on when it was profanity, really... I don't know if they caught it, but when my father was nearby whilst playing Saints Row... I drove by one of the "Pussy Liquors" semi-trailers... yes... I was hoping to God that they didn't catch it.