Quantcast

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare

Also known as: CoD 4

The Top 7... games that should've had co-op

Because playing with yourself is only fun for so long

Words: Brett Elston, GamesRadar US

Needed co-op because: we would have had an excuse to run through the campaign yet again.

Make no mistake, CoD 4 suffered naught by excluding co-op. The tightly constructed missions and acutely focused level design made the solo experience one of our favorite campaigns of all time. However… you are surrounded by a crew for the vast majority of the game, and if those guys were controlled by friends instead of AI that faded into the background, replayability for the single-player game could have rivaled that of the epidemically popular multiplayer. Then again, we already gave the game a 10/10, so it’s not like there’s room to grow.

Aside from the obvious longevity boost, co-op in Modern Warfare seemed like the rational thing to do in 2007. Consider that Gears was a year old at that point, known for its deeply entrenched cooperative storyline, and that Modern Warfare went up against Halo 3, which sported four-player co-op. After all that buddy-watch-my-back time with the other games, playing a one-man-army story in CoD 4 felt, at least initially, a little empty.

The good news is that last year’s Call of Duty: World at War added a four-player co-op mode, so it stands to reason this year’s Modern Warfare 2 will follow suit. Consider our free time preemptively allotted.


Needed co-op because: it’s part of a beat-‘em-up franchise that’s practically synonymous with multiplayer co-op.


Not pictured: The other two guys who were part of this franchise

OK, so Sega wanted to jump start one of its long lost franchises, one that hadn’t seen real action since 1993. We’re fine with that. Problem is, Sega decided to take Golden Axe down a single-player road it had no business traversing alone.

Ax Battler and the fine-bearded Gilius Thunderhead were nixed from Beast Rider, leaving only a super-slutted-up version of Tyris Flare, the series’ sword-swinging Amazon. Again, we’re sort of fine with that – it’s a chance to re-invent the series for a new age, maybe even position it as competition against God of War or Heavenly Sword. Instead, all the attention went to Tyris and her barely covered man magnets.

Beast Rider is presently in intensive care, recovering from a savage beating at the hands of nefarious games journalists. Shit controls and bad-for-2005 gameplay torpedoed any hopes that the franchise could make a triumphant return. The last Golden Axe game was a Saturn-only fighter that sucked a generously large pile of balls – didn’t anyone want to make a better impression this time around?

Worst of all, the devs knew this was a bad move and have already said the (probably dead) sequel will “have all the characters in co-op.” Um, maybe if you had done that the first time, you’d have a chance to make a sequel.


 
64 Comments
Order Comments: Newest First | Oldest First
skyguy343  - 9 months 27 days ago 
SotC would be the awesomest thing EVARZ in co-op
zabu_san  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I just think every FPS should have the option of being CO-OP in this day and age...
Why wouldn't it...I hate to say it but, Halo 2 did it last gen, so...
dougle  - 9 months 27 days ago 
i dont mean to be "that guy" but kingdom hearts & final fantasy xii as well as maybe dark chronicle(dark cloud 2)would also be great fun co-op
monojono  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Dead rising should be on this list. U were constantly surronded with crappy AI partners, and messing around with a mate on this would of rocked.
curtw_819  - 9 months 27 days ago 
the game that comes to my mind is Fallout 3... how bad a$$ would it if u and 3 others roam around the wastelands... raidin the talon mercs hideout... just look at fable 2
GamesRadarCharlieBarratt  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I particularly enjoyed the entry on GTA IV.
Masterfully worded.
Hypermonkey262  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Im surprised Mass Effect didnt make an appearence. Im sure my team wouldnt have died as often if I had someone else controling tham.
Christopia  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I also had been thinking fallout 3 would have ruled with an actual human buddy, the AI side kicks were limited to say the least.

Going back a few years, any one remember power rangers on the SNES? Awsome game but why leave out co-op?
twishart  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I vaguely remember reading something about SOTC being a 4 player game originally? Or maybe it was some mod someone was dreaming up - either way, it sounds pretty cool, and would add a whole new dynamic to taking some of the colossi down (all four players need to stab seperate areas at once, form 'human chains' to reach inaccesible areas, etc). Overall, it would detract a little from the isolated feel of the game - but it would certainly be a blast to play...
hohee45  - 9 months 27 days ago 
i have to agree with dougal, kingdom hearts with a buddy would be pure genious.
GamesRadarJoeMcNeilly  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Dead Rising co-op would have been magnificent. Look for the sequel to deliver on that.

I'm torn about whether BioShock would have been any good as a co-op game - the sense of isolation is crucial to the atmosphere of the story.
GoldenMe  - 9 months 27 days ago 
@Joe- I recently heard that Bioshock MIGHT have multiplayer (Maybe even co-op). Still, it might either enhance the perfection of Bioshock, or utterly ruin it.
RooringRA  - 9 months 27 days ago 
I dont think Bioshock should be co-op I mean whats the fun and weirdness of killing splicers and big dadys when somone else is there doing it with you.
TheSuburbiaRuins  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Jericho..
If it had co-op, the person would have to be good with whatever character they were going to use. Because some peoples techniques and skills are needed to kill certain enemies, and get through certain parts of the game.

I would know, I played the SHIT out of that game.
GamesRadarBrettElston  - 9 months 27 days ago 
^ I agree. I think that's what would make the battles against the larger enemies so much fun. Still a decent game solo, but if it were co-op I'd probably run through it multiple times.
Sebastian16  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Battlefield: Bad Company badly needed co-op I think.
T0M95  - 9 months 27 days ago 
fallout needs coop
DaFunk  - 9 months 27 days ago 
Top game that should've had co-op? Fable 2. lulz

Seriously though, couldn't agree more with #1; Turtles in Time is like the greatest co-op experience ever.
vic88  - 9 months 27 days ago 
devil may cry or ninja gaiden would be more hectic and fun with two or three other characters ( Dante, Nero, Trish and Lady all fighting at the same time
saveTehcheese  - 9 months 27 days ago 
^da funk? fable 2 had co-op. sorry to kill your smartness high.....
Related Games
TMNT
PSP
Xbox
Xbox
DiRT 2 PC demo leaked N4G
PC News from N4G
30 Nov 2009
Machinarium Update Released N4G
PC News from N4G
30 Nov 2009
ArmA 2 Update Released N4G
PC News from N4G
30 Nov 2009
Steam Top 10 Weekly Sales Chart, Nov 22-28 N4G
PC News from N4G
30 Nov 2009