Quantcast

Call of Duty: World at War


Call of Duty: World at War - multiplayer hands-on

Will the shooter maintain online dominance for another year? Sure as hell looks that way...

Tossing in living squad mates changes the dynamic incredibly. For one, most people will now want to be the first in a room - guns a blazin’ - as the rewards now outweigh the risk. Cower behind cover and you’ll find a room swept and all the points awarded to the players with the bigger balls.

 

Second, players fall but they don’t die right away. Instead, they’re given the Last Stand option of picking off people with a handgun until revived. You must revive your buddies. They won’t die right away, so you can scoop up their kill points for yourself as long as you’re keeping careful eye on the on-screen “Revive” indicator. Because if you let a player die, the game’s over, Junior. Luckily, reviving a fallen comrade awards you with additional points, so your Samaritan deeds can also be strung together for multiplier combos if timed appropriately.

Of course, knowing what’s coming gives the player an advantage. In the Japanese jungle map “Relentless” (Holy crap, not just a clever name) knowing where and when enemies appear definitely offered clear advantage. If you’re well aware of the Banzai barrage waiting in the brush, hang back and pick enemies off from afar rather than risk a critical bayoneting from a manic and well camouflaged enemy.

 

In the Berlin based “Eviction,” points were even awarded for slaughtering wounded and surrendered soldiers, at the behest of those cold and merciless Ruskies. Sure it stings the conscience the first time, but hey, it’s free points! We chucked a Molotov Cocktail right in the middle of three unarmed soldiers, hands in air, and trust us when we say the “x3” prompt was just as satisfying as putting down a capable combatant.

As if you needed more reason to care, XP earned in online co-op is fully integrated with multiplayer. It’s actually in your best interest to give it a shot. We can’t wait to play more, especially since our hands-on session saw “Professional Game Journalists” refusing to surrender their co-op stations for hours on end. Generally a good sign, just sayin’.

Rest your worries, friends. It’s no hype, we’ve played it and it’s safe to say Call of Duty: World at War is in extremely capable hands over at Treyarch. With more of what we loved, and the addition of what you demanded, we’re going to go ahead call this another victory for CoD in the battle for online supremacy. Find out if we’re lying November 11 of this year.

Oct 08, 2008


 
32 Comments
Order Comments: Newest First | Oldest First
GoldenMe  - 1 year 1 month ago 
This is starting to look like a must buy on release. Yes, it might be.

Oh well, FIRST.
Bman10120  - 1 year 1 month ago 
I thought the multiplayer was going to suck but i guess Treyrch took a lot from infinity ward. It looks good but i might want to get gears of war 2 instead of this
marcusfenix22  - 1 year 1 month ago 
i am definitely buying this game i already bought it online
Cwf2008  - 1 year 1 month ago 
Hmm well it doesnt look too bad but theres still no hiding the fact its gone back to damn World War 2 with all the weapons we loved from CoD2...well still it might be worth renting
nebnamlessac  - 1 year 1 month ago 
gonna be flippin awesome I cant wait
treyarch definately did an amazing job this time
ive already got my copy reserved
lava_lamp  - 1 year 1 month ago 
hey all these guns i mean why cant we be friends?
MadCowDisease  - 1 year 1 month ago 
I'm not entirely sure that this will be my favorite game out there due to it being like COD4 (Which became boring because it was rather easy, so I just play private matches), but it should be good enough for me, since i'm not a big fan of any other game coming out this fall.

@Cwf2008

Who cares if it's World War 2? There are actually more modern games out there then WW2, it's just COD4 was the only "noticeable" modern game because it made even the worst FPS player feel like he's doing good. Don't go with the "I'm tired of the whole Nazi deal" now, many modern FPS's out there favor the "Stop the nukes, stop the terrorists" deal as well

Treyarch is only really being hammered because of COD3, and that's understandable to some extent. The main reason they did so terrible is because they only were given 8 months by Activision because they're a money-hungry company just like EA. The average shooter takes 2 years, which is how many IW and COD4 were given.

I plan on public starring the game online until I get bored of it like most of my buddies, then I'll just go to competitive private matches and Co-op once the public matches get boring and infiltrated by kids who are ridiculously easy to kill.

Nebnamlessac, i'm sure this game will be great to a majority of people, because it's pretty much sounding like a carbon-copy of COD4. Which is good, but to myself i'll just say "Ok." because COD4 got boring when it became easy to me.

I'm sure the flamethrower will be big for the first week or so it's out, until people figure out how hindering it was to have one. In real life, they had semi-small range, if the tank was shot you would go up in flames, and that the tank depleted (but does recharge).

Perks may have some type of problem though, not because i'm the idiot who says juggernaut is for "noobs" (I hate to use that term), but because this game will not just be automatics like COD4 was mostly, but because there will be a majority of Bolt-action and semi-automatic rifles as well. If the bolt-action rifles were all one hit kills WITH stopping power, then I would assume the M1 Garand would be 2 shots with anything, so smart M1 users would use juggernaut. That would be a balancing issue.

I'm happy with the return of silencers because I am one of those guys who like to hide under radar. Not exactly realistic, but who cares that much about realism? My favorite gun will be the MP40, PPSH, or Thompson silenced, with whatever they decide to call UAV jammer since it won't be a UAV, it'll be a recon plane.

All in all, this should be a game I rate 9 or a 9.5 out of 10. Not the greatest game, but I'll be happy with it, just like how I gave COD4 the same rating.
oreomonkey  - 1 year 1 month ago 
good job mad cow disease, 10 frekin paragraphs congratulations
Bri77777  - 1 year 1 month ago 
.............um.... Okay, the whole idea of WWII has been so overused, that COD4 was pretty much a breath of fresh air. ............and there were cooler guns.
GrumpyGrunt2  - 1 year 1 month ago 
Slaughtering surrendered soldiers?!? Awesome!
blocpartier  - 1 year 1 month ago 
Now I'm pumped to play this game! I Reserved a copy at Best Buy and got a fabric banner with it that hangs proudly in my locker at school.
Defguru7777  - 1 year 1 month ago 
Maybe converting back to World War II won't be the death of the series.
smileykyley  - 1 year 1 month ago 
The only thing that I really wanted to see in this game was the COD3 style multiplayer. Not the whole concept, but being able to drop in and out of split screen online was cool.
When me and my friends play we used to play four on four on two different systems because thats all we had. with COD4 we couldn't do that...
whew!
MilitaryRaiden  - 1 year 1 month ago 
Man, this Antista guy is hilarious!! I still remember the part with his mom playing Oblivion and the photo montages of him laughing at the twin towers 9/11 disaster. Keep it up!
peteypablo2624  - 1 year 1 month ago 
dude, im so pumped for this game, i preordered 2 months ago. I love these articles when u guys focus on one game and describe it.
joemonem  - 1 year 1 month ago 
i dont think its gonna be as good as cod 4 plus i dont have live so i cant play multiplayer
Tasty_Pasta  - 1 year 1 month ago 
I don't know Chris. CoD4 got real old after awhile, and I don't know if I could go back to the same style gameplay. I'll probably stick with Socom for the multiplayer.
bron1417  - 1 year 1 month ago 
MOAR!! is really a good thing i cant wait!!
georgeguy  - 1 year 1 month ago 
wow i i want this game alot more now

when they ment 4 play online did they include the ps3. i god hope so
ripcorder  - 1 year 1 month ago 
I just did a sex wee
This video player requires Flash 9 Player or later. Please download the latest Flash Player.
The Knowledge
Call of Duty: World at War
Call of Duty: World at War

Genre: Shooter
Release date: Nov 11, 2008
Published by: Activision
Developed by: Treyarch
Franchise: Call of Duty
Multiplayer Modes:
Offline
1 player SOLO
Online
32 player VS
4 player CO-OP
9 AWESOME
Read the review
Latest Articles About This Game
Campaign, co-op and multiplayer, all given a thorough going over
PC Preview  -  Oct 22, 2008
Will the shooter maintain online dominance for another year? Sure as hell looks that way...
PC Preview  -  Oct 8, 2008
Knee-jerk reviews after ten minutes' play-time. As is only right and proper
PC Preview  -  Aug 26, 2008
EXCLUSIVE: First gameplay videos, new screens, and hands-on impressions!
PC Preview  -  Aug 19, 2008
It’s not over yet! World War II calls us back to action
PC Preview  -  Aug 4, 2008