Pachter (groan) suggests $100 Xbox Live Platinum service is on the way

Better but more expensive than a Gold subscription?

Words: on September 3, 2010

Just to be clear, we don't go around believing everything that industry analyst Michael Pachter says. He was, after all, rather spectacularly wrong about how well Red Dead Redemption would do at retail. However, he's actually said something very interesting today that is cause for thought.

His thinking is that Microsoft's recently-announced hike in Xbox Live Gold subscription rates (which he called, admittedly) has come in to boost revenue with the aim of using the money to develop a third tier on the Xbox Live subscription options. We already have the basic Silver and premium Gold memberships - Pachter reckons we'll have a 'Platinum' level membership option in the not-too distant future. For $100. Ouch. Here's what he believes that would mean for you.


Above: *apparently

The current Gold membership appears at first glance to offer everything an online gamer could want. Online play, cross-game voice chat, movies to download and demos to play. Some content is even available early to Gold subscribers, compared to the free Silver membership that comes with every console. So what could a 'Platinum' service offer to top that?

 

Internet TV

Gold subscribers can already get Sky TV (at extra cost), so it would be very welcome if Network/'terrestrial' channels were available on the dashboard as part of a Platinum subscription package. If Sky TV itself were bundled in, it would be better still.


Above: Sky Player as it is on Xbox 360. Decent-ish picture quality, but we would pay more for HD TV stations

 

In-game credits

We already have MS Points, but Pachter suggests a credit system could allow Platinum subscribers to buy exclusive content for games like Halo, such as new weapons or custom armour. This wouldn't cost Microsoft very much to implement, but could get fans interested in the service right away.

 

Early access to demos/betas

Gold subscribers are already supposed to get some preferential treatment when it comes to demos, but offering beta access to Platinum subscribers would again be a massive pull for the more dedicated gamers among us. Would you pay $100 a year to be able to play Modern Warfare 3 before the rest of the world? I know a lot of people who would.

 

iTunes management

Pachter reckons iTunes 'management' could be part of the service. It may sound completely unlikely given Apple's usual stance on its properties, but remember that Xbox 360 already has a specific downloadable update to allow iPods to connect to the custom soundtrack option in games. I can't really imagine my Xbox 360 hard drive being full of my iTunes library and buying the Djerv album (when it finally comes out) via the Xbox dashboard. But stranger things have happened. Facebook's on it, after all.


Above: iTunes... on Xbox Live? We'll believe it when we see it

Someone once advised me that Pachter most likely has insider information when it comes to 'predicting' these things. That may or may not be true. But looking at the evidence with the price increase of Gold and the recent launch of PlayStation Plus, it doesn't seem like Microsoft is likely to offer anything for free.

Would you pay more for an even better Xbox Live service? Let us know in the comments.

3 Sep, 2010

Source: Softpedia 

Related

Platforms:

Xbox 360

Topics:

Microsoft

25 Comments
Order Comments: Newest First | Oldest First
  • pin316

    pin316  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    This Pachter fellow is a danger to the industry - if the crap that he comes up with isn't true, then that means he's actually putting ideas into the heads of people like Kotick/MS etc...

    Anybody got any 'contacts' in the contracting industry?

    oh, and the increase for Gold was coming a mile off - standard inflation would have put the price of a xbl gold subscription up, yet is was kept at the same price - most likely because MS realised that increasing the price would potentially cost them customers who already grumbled about the fact that xbl costs whilst PSN was free. When Sony announced PSN+, it gave MS the room they needed to adjust the price = simples
  • Doctalen

    Doctalen  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    I was okay paying $50 a year, I am okay paying $60 a year, but paying $100 is a hell no. I enjoy Netflix, I enjoy is a lot. Facebook sucks simply becuase of the bad typing. And I don't use Zune at all. Now if itunes came on to the 360, I might consider paying $70 a year. I love my Ipod and I love my Itunes but I hate it when it is difficult to play music on my 360. If I could I would love to use my Itunes account without my Ipod.
  • HitmanSB07

    HitmanSB07  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Everything except the in game credits is shit, so I doubt i'd pick it up.
  • reverandglass

    reverandglass  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Considering people are actually buying PSN+ I wouldn't be suprised if MS followed suit in some way. Personally I still think it's crazy that people pay for Gold so there's bound to be some daft fanboys willing to pay that much for Live. What I'd like to see is the opposite: a cheaper simpler version with now facebook, last.fm etc. just online gaming for about £15 a year...but then I think there's more chance of hell freezing over. (I would have put DNF coming out except for today's news! lol)
  • DMarten

    DMarten  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Jesus I suck. I didn't mean to call Pachter an it, and I meant I would stay a gold member...
  • DMarten

    DMarten  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Was Pachter spectacularly wrong with Red Dead? I thought it said if the reviews got an average of 85% or more that it would sell 2-3 million copies. Is that what happened?

    Also, wasn't he suggesting there might not be a market for the game? I think Chris Antista had basically the same ideas Pachter did...

    I'd bet anything that Microsoft is thinking about doing this. If it happens, that remains to be seen. If it does happen, I'm happy to stay a good member.
  • keefster

    keefster  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    serious BS. when the 10 buck price hike was announced, fine, I can deal with that.

    But if this is true, it would mean you would have to pay 70 bucks a year for a sub par obsolete service. Why would they raise the gold price and at the same time release 'platinum' for 100 bucks??? Besides, I already have a TV, I will watch tv with my tv, not on my noisy as shit xbox connected to the tv. Its stupid, and I barely use the features they have on gold now other than than arcade and map packs.
  • oufour

    oufour  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    no. just no.
  • RacoonHail

    RacoonHail  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Disbelief in Pachter aside, I do not know anyone would actually purchase this service. iTunes is pretty meh, same with TV. And Beta access is interesting, but if they limit their beta pool to people with this "platinum" service, well that could be a very small pool, and that would defeat the point of the beta, so companies serious about running a beta would still release it to gold members who bought a previous game or something of that sort. So, why should we get this hypothetical service?
  • batmanboy11

    batmanboy11  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    I doubt they were planning this. Pachter may have given them the idea though. Anyway, I really do not want to pay $100 a year, unless you all DLC is free, arcade games are cheaper and sometimes you get free arcade games.
  • DrRock

    DrRock  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    I think the only person that believes the sh*t that Pachter spews is Pachter himself.
  • Waldo

    Waldo  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    More reason to update your PC and play decent games for a reasonable price. Like the cost of the actual game and your internet connection. What a novel idea. MS, I spit on your "Bonus Offers" and "Extra Features".
  • iluvmyDS

    iluvmyDS  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Bag of hot air. I'll believe it when I see it.
  • NotBraze

    NotBraze  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Actually the iTunes thing isn't backwards from Apple's position, it's backwards from Microsoft. Apple already makes iTunes, and Safari available to PC users for free, Apple established Boot Camp to allow the installation of a Windows OS on a Mac, and iPod, iPads, and iPhones work with Windows machines just as well as they work on Macs.

    Apple's stance seems to be much more generous than Microsoft who, by comparison, pulled the plug on Internet Explorer for Mac, made the Zune incompatible with Macs, charge obscene amounts for Microsoft Office on Mac, their media streaming system on Xbox 360 only works with Windows Media Center, they stopped supporting iPod connectivity for the Xbox after the Zune was released, etc. That's the thing that I find most unlikely about this prediction because as much as Apple has tried to reach out to Windows users Microsoft tries to make life as hard as possible for Mac users; I can't see them implementing iTunes support any time soon.
  • icbacomingupwithapropername

    icbacomingupwithapropername  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    What they ought to do is call silver bronze and make a new one that's less then gold and all you can do Is play games online and use partys.
  • wormytables

    wormytables  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    i disagree with pachter here - they probably would not have upped the price of gold if they were going to offer something even more expensive... well, that seems logical to me anyway.

    there's only so much they can offer, there's only so much people will pay for.

    add more value please.
  • cj12297

    cj12297  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    thats a bit shit for 100 a year
  • tacoman38

    tacoman38  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    "Plus early access to demos and betas should all ready be given to Gold members."

    truth.

    We're already premium if we're gold. It would make more sense to keep Gold the same and make a lower version with just basic online play, party creation, voice chat, friend list.
  • CapNJunkie

    CapNJunkie  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Hmmmm, could be interesting but it completely depends on what is included for that price.
    Why not have another tier with another package? It's supposed to be all about choice after all.
    BTW, my Magic 8-Ball says (shake, shake, shake)... "Ask again later"
  • Birday

    Birday  - 1 year, 5 months ago  - Report

    Dear Xbox Live- Don't become an iPhone.

    I pay to play 'videogames' 'online' if I want to watch TV I go to the internet. Why would I pay?

    Plus early access to demos and betas should all ready be given to Gold members.

    If this happenes I will be v.cross with Micro$oft. More so than my 360 redringing for the 5th time.
Most Commented
Connect with GamesRadar